It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sos37
Here we go, this is what I feared would happen. You Democrats on ATS said we had to worry about McCain/Palin taking away rights???
Originally posted by Marcus Calpurnius
They know Obama is going to do unpopular things and the only chance they have of pulling one over on the American people, is by silencing dissent.
Originally posted by centurion1211
It is nothing less than an assault on our 1st amendment rights by democrats that want to do away with all "dissenting voices",
Originally posted by jam321
They want to tell oil companies how much of a profit is too much.
They want to tell media what the audience should listen to.
They want to further subsidize the poor at the expense of the rich.
They should look in the mirror and questioned themselves about how fair and balance they are being.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
With Obama in the drivers seat and a Democratic control of both houses, I garruntee this will be a one sided affair. Pexx. There is nothing fair about the fairness doctrine. Its a large step backwards.
Originally posted by sos37
I want to pose a question to all the liberals who might be reading this thread and who can't stand Sarah Palin because of her inquiring on getting rid of certain books from the library. .....How is the Fairness Doctrine any different?
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by maybereal11
OK, to be fair. Please show us obama quotes where he opposes the fairness doctrine.
And quite honestly, many of us are very concerned that due to obama's gross inexperience at anything on the federal or international level, it will be Pelosi, Schumer, etc., running obama rather than the other way around.
[edit on 11/6/2008 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by maybereal11
I lean toward believing that Barack Obama OPPOSES the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE because that is WHAT HE HAS STATED.
The rest is just speculation.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by maybereal11
I lean toward believing that Barack Obama OPPOSES the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE because that is WHAT HE HAS STATED.
The rest is just speculation.
Exactly. You "lean toward believing ..." I asked you for real examples of what his position is.
So, admittedly, you have no evidence or even a clue what obama's position is on the fairness doctrine. You just think it will be all right because you like him.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by maybereal11
I lean toward believing that Barack Obama OPPOSES the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE because that is WHAT HE HAS STATED.
The rest is just speculation.
Exactly. You "lean toward believing ..." I asked you for real examples of what his position is.
So, admittedly, you have no evidence or even a clue what obama's position is on the fairness doctrine. You just think it will be all right because you like him.
Thats strange...You chopped off the whole bottom two thirds of my post where I posted PRECISELY what Obama's position is with SOURCES.
How is this for evidence and a "clue" as to where he stands...
his press secretary sent an email to the industry journal Broadcasting & Cable and stated flatly that "Sen. Obama does not support reimposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters."
I was being generous in saying "I lean toward believing"
Re-read my post please.
*See last post for several sources
[edit on 6-11-2008 by maybereal11]