It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“The line they pulled out is in the context of cap and trade program,” says an Obama spokesperson. “The point Obama is making is that we need to transition from coal burning power plants built with old technology to plants built with advanced technologies -- and that is exactly the action that will be incentivized under a cap and trade program.”
John McCain Proposes A Cap-And-Trade System That Would Set Limits On Greenhouse Gas Emissions While Encouraging The Development Of Low-Cost Compliance Options. A climate cap-and-trade mechanism would set a limit on greenhouse gas emissions and allow entities to buy and sell rights to emit, similar to the successful acid rain trading program of the early 1990s. The key feature of this mechanism is that it allows the market to decide and encourage the lowest-cost compliance options.
John McCain's Strategy For Confronting Global Climate Change
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
I think you're confused as to encouragement and punishment. If you want to encourage cleaner energy you'd be best to offer incentives and tax breaks.
These incentives are an important first step in promoting carbon capture and storage as a tool to fight global warming.
The incentives are designed to drive early commercial CCS projects forward. Possible projects that could benefit include coal gasification and power production CCS projects in the Midwest as well as a pipeline from the Midwest to the Gulf Coast for enhanced oil recovery.
The renewable-energy tax incentives tucked into the financial bailout package passed by the House on Friday include billions of dollars in breaks for old-fashioned fossil-fuel processes such as liquefying coal and squeezing petroleum out of sand and rock.
so maybe your brother needs to be asking `why is this company wanting max $$$ and not trying to save taxes?` - the tax breaks are allready there for CO2 reduction but as an industry coal companies use them the least as they cant be assed.
Originally posted by Harlequin
so maybe your brother needs to be asking `why is this company wanting max $$$ and not trying to save taxes?` - the tax breaks are allready there for CO2 reduction but as an industry coal companies use them the least as they cant be assed.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
You nay sayers do realise that coal is THE main source of energy and that any and all expenses forced on thesecompanies are going to be passed on to YOU. Thats including taxes and incentives. Without coal, theres no steel, roads, concrete, Or electricity. Also just what CLEAN sources of energy are you folks going to use??? Solar?? not for another 10 years minimum. natural gas??? Greenies are not allowing any way to get from where it is to where it needs to be. GOD FORBID anyone mentions Nuclear!!!!. Pricing anything that causes americans to foot an already large portion of their everyday expenses will only drive us into mediocrity and the streets!
Zindo