It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stinkhorn
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
Sorry, but the wealthy in this country give more to charity than any taxing system could, their money also goes towards research and development.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
Personaly, no. The old addage that" You don't get a job from a poor person" tend to sway my opinion. Also, where would the drive to succeed come from if you only can go so far in your endeavour? Limiting the reward, limits the reason. You'd also have to controll pricing and wages. Another limiting factor and unworkable! Just my dos centavos!!
Zindo
Originally posted by BlackOps719
Since when does any government have the RIGHT to take money away from a person who has legally earned it and give it to someone else who has done nothing to deserve it?
The true good of the capitalist ideology is that there is no glass ceiling, that you are allowed to be as successful as you choose to be and thus enjoy the spoils of your hard work.
What you are describing is communism and it has no place in American society.
Originally posted by tsloan
The government steals money away from people everyday...Its called TAXES! And they re-distribute it to government programs which are then sub-contracted out to private companies????? Do you see a pattern here. The government has a right they exercise every April. And everyone has been conditioned to allow this to happen.
Originally posted by NettleTea
My question to those who wish to "cap the rich" is what do you hope to accomplish by this measure?
Originally posted by NettleTea
What do you find more frightening; a group of private individuals / companies with wealth of their own, or a government, having a tyrannical track record, with a war chest vast enough to conquer most of the world?
Originally posted by Buck Division
Don't you realize Nettle? The two groups you describe above are the SAME GROUP.
Originally posted by Solarskye
There's no way the government should ever cap the wealthy. No Way! This is what the American dream is about isn't it.
Originally posted by Buck Division
reply to post by mystiq
That is correct. That would be one way to go. But it wouldn't likely make you rich.
Consider the case of Linus Torvalds -- creator of the famous Linux operating system. It is an amazing piece of work -- really revolutionized things. What is he doing now? Successful, I am sure -- but no Bill Gates or Steven Jobs.
Really -- it boils down to Karl Marx and the tools of production residing in the hands of a limited few. Nobody can afford to popularize / advertise their invention without going after investors -- the people with money
Check it out. Venture Capitalists drive a hard bargain.
And BTW, I doubt that Linux is even on the radar screen for 90% of the world, even though it is vastly superior to the Windows operating system. That's how it goes.
Originally posted by Artista
I'm so tired of reading about how we as a people should somehow feel guilty for wanting to earn a good living and having a good life.
Originally posted by Artista
What's wrong with wanting to be rich? What's wrong with wanting more? What's wrong with earning 2 billion and then earning even more?
Originally posted by Artista
I'm sorry, but I dont want to settle for mediocre or just getting by and if I made 10 billion dollars, it's MY business and I'll do with it what I want.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
If i were i'd be recommending giving everyone an equal share in a Lenin type ideal. That's not what i'm doing, i'm suggesting a system that would still have rich and poor but the standard of living for everyone would be increased.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Well you didn't reply to my last post. Which hurt my well-being. But the tears have ceased to flow, so I figure I will prod a little more.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Slippery slope of course.
It's either equal or it's not.
So it it's not, then what's the magic number? What's the sweet spot?
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Where is the critical threshold that says 'hey, we have now optimized the standard of living for the rich AND the poor'?
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
I do not believe it can genuinely be argued that this is achieved from anything other then being equal. For anything else is not equality.
Granted, when I say this I am nothing thinking about money per se, rather the necessities such as food, shelter, water, air, warmth(clothing), etc.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I already said 2 billion would be more than enough for any individual to live an extremely good life, after that any more personal wealth would be given to charities, preferably of the choosing of the person who earnt the money. However this might need experimentation with the amount.
Again experimentation would be needed. However i'm not encouraging direct benefits for people overall. I'm more in for giving the money to charities, boosting the healthcare system, youth programs etc.