Michele Bachmann is a disgrace to the human race.

reply to post by jokei



I don't know how you could have missed what she meant, considering you've devoted so much emotion in attempts to discredit her in this thread alone

She is for AMERICA ... and for AMERICANS !

America is NOT Africa, is not the Middle East, is NOT Israel

America is for AMERICANS .. is NOT for ungrateful immigrants .. is NOT for Zionists .. is NOT the tool of Israel or of the Jews who control Congress and who have their arms lodged firmly up the backsides of all the OTHER, gutless swine who SELL OUT America and Americans every minute of every hour.

Michele Bachmann appears very much to CARE about AMERICANS .. about what AMERICA USED TO BE and what America COULD BE AGAIN .. if it rid itself of the PARASITES which are busily DESTROYING the US out of sheer JEALOUSY, INSANITY, IGNORANCE and GREED.

That's what I derived from just the two brief videos posted above


America is LUCKY .. FORTUNATE .. BLESSED to have this woman fighting in their corner against the rapid, slavering dogs of war and madness.

Long live Michele Bachmann --- a TRUE herione working for the betterment of the American people

My main criticism of this lady is that she seems somewhat incapable of strining coherent sentences together - this makes her look and sound Stupid, lacking in education etc, that was the first thing that struck me when I viewed the first video in this thread. I would think it to be a major criteria for a politician to be capable of stringing a sentence together using the laws/rules of their native language, would you agree with that?

Quite clearly America is not Africa or any other nation, I'm unsure of the relevance of raising that point. I'd like clarification on what you think an American is Dock6? Would it be a Native American, or any one of the floods of immigrants that has made the populace up over the past 200 years or so, or just the w.a.s.p's?

What exactly is wrong with the Zionist and what is your definition of a Zionist?

Which Jews are controlling congress, could you name some please?





[edit on 26-10-2008 by jokei]

[edit on 26-10-2008 by jokei]

reply to post by Dock6


Hey Dock6, hope all is well. I disagree, but we're adults and that's ok. She is American, but her agenda is not how it "should be" - Having 28 children and living in a different state than them makes it difficult to "raise" them, although one may ask that question if she were a stay at home mom. again - check out my michele bachman calls for anti american with hunt thread - here's another as there are plenty.



ColoradoJens

You know it's funny (funny sad) that for years the Liberal Democrats have been yelling that women could do anything a man could and when a women is in a legislative position as Bachmann and Palin they are now bad mothers, must not speak their minds, must not seek high office just because they are Republicans.

BTW she said there were two kid at home in high school. I'll bet that after school or weekends they are working for daddy and not hanging out at the mall.

Roper

she is definitely not on target. WE Americans started all this hate by jumping into a People's life that we did not understand nor did we know the language or have a true understanding of the religion, nothing. i used to feel lucky to be an american but ole GW
has ruined that. i don't know if we will ever regain our place in this world as we as a nation guided by ego greed and downright stupidity have come to an impasse. i look to Obama
as a leader but such a mess he would have to deal with, and americans addicted to fast food, fast everything may not have the patience to deal with it. yes, michelle is with Them and i wouldn't vote for her even if i was offered tons of money. thanks for bringing her to
my attention.

Originally posted by jokei
My main criticism of this lady is that she seems somewhat incapable of strining coherent sentences together - this makes her look and sound

If you are talking about the second youtube video the interviewer was intentionally not letting her speak. Obviously there was a 4 second satellite delay and the interviewer looked a bit retarded when he kept repeating his questions during the delay, he was causing her to stop and start constantly.

But I guess she is a "bad" person, and as is usually the case when "bad people" are interviewed it is important to ask questions but not give them time to answer.

Well reading MANY of these responces I now know why America is going in the pooper! This woman speaks her mind, is HONEST about her feelings and speaks for MILLIONS of the American populace...but ATS proves time and time again that we are in SERIOUS trouble. When I read posters writing "she a discrace" / "she's stupid" / "I would never vote for her" / "she doesn't have a clue"...etc...it makes me shake my head. WHY? Because the same people slamming an HONEST - UPFRONT politician (who is correct most of the time) are the same fools who believe the udder lies and crap a majority of the "other" politicians spew and WILL vote for.

Its about time we had people in office who ARE concerned for THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES...not for PC, not for BIG BUSINESS, not for THEMSELEVES and other bigwigs! IMO of course...

reply to post by rcwj75


As you put it, America is going into the pooper exactly due to people like this. She is getting hammered by her own party for it.

ColoradoJens

reply to post by pluckynoonez


ummm ok you're joking right? I don't agree with anything she stands for and if I saw her in person I would probably get arrested. How dare she say "only in France could something like that happen"? No dumba** not only in France that crap happens in our wonderful country all the time.

And you can tell that just because she probably grew up with daddy's money she thinks she's better than someone who grew up poor, when really she's just ignorant to the real problems that real Americans go through. If hating people like her isn't as American as you can be I don't know what is, I don't care what you say.

reply to post by jokei



I'm sure you could have found the following information yourself.

However, I've had a scout around the Net and here are some articles you may find of interest.

Firstly, from Brother Nathanael Kapner, a jew, we are provided the following:

www.realjewnews.com...

Brother Nathanael's home page can be found here:
www.realjewnews.com...

Then we go to Wikipedia, with which most are familiar:
en.wikipedia.org...

We next hear from The International Jerusalem Post,
which headlines: ' Most Jews ever set to enter Congress'
and leads with:

A record number of Jewish members will enter Congress Thursday, but more remarkable are the unparalleled positions of power they will hold on committees related to Israel, many local Jewish activists say.

www.jpost.com.../JPArticle/ShowFull

Next is an article found at random on the Net after a search for 'AIPAC' (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). This was the first article the search produced:

' ...In fact, Israel is a liability in the war on terror and the broader effort to deal with rogue states.

cont. ' ... ‘Terrorism’ is not a single adversary, but a tactic employed by a wide array of political groups.

The terrorist organisations that threaten Israel do not threaten the United States, except when it intervenes against them (as in Lebanon in 1982).

Moreover, Palestinian terrorism is not random violence directed against Israel or ‘the West’; it is largely a response to Israel’s prolonged campaign to colonise the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

cont. ' More important, saying that Israel and the US are united by a shared terrorist threat has the causal relationship backwards --- the US has a terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel, not the other way around.'

cont. '...As for so-called rogue states in the Middle East, they are not a dire threat to vital US interests, except inasmuch as they are a threat to Israel '

cont. ' ...A final reason to question Israel’s strategic value is that it does not behave like a loyal ally.

Israeli officials frequently ignore US requests and renege on promises (including pledges to stop building settlements and to refrain from ‘targeted assassinations’ of Palestinian leaders).

Israel has provided sensitive military technology to potential rivals like China, in what the State Department inspector-general called ‘a systematic and growing pattern of unauthorised transfers’.

According to the General Accounting Office, Israel also ‘conducts the most aggressive espionage operations against the US of any ally’.

In addition to the case of Jonathan Pollard, who gave Israel large quantities of classified material in the early 1980s (which it reportedly passed on to the Soviet Union in return for more exit visas for Soviet Jews), a new controversy erupted in 2004 when it was revealed that a key Pentagon official called Larry Franklin had passed classified information to an Israeli diplomat.

Israel is hardly the only country that spies on the US, but its willingness to spy on its principal patron casts further doubt on its strategic value.'

The above are from an online article: The Israel Lobby
John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
www.lrb.co.uk...

The following is interesting, in relation to the above:

I've paraphrased below, in order to not exceed the desired amount of 'quotes' in this post:

John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) is reputedly amongst America's most admired political scientists ' whilst Stephen Walt is the academic dean and a chaired professor at Harvard's Kennedy School. They authored the article from which the above quoted excerpts derive.

Neither man has ever made any remotely racist or anti-Semitic utterance in the public sphere.

Yet, because they recently published the above essay in The London Review of Books and (with full scholarly apparatus) on the Kennedy School website (an article which .. and this is critically important ... unsentimentally examines the role of the "Israel lobby" in the making of US foreign policy) --- these two academics were subjected to what has been described as a 'relentless barrage of vituperative insults in which the accusation "anti-Semite" is merely the beginning '.

In relation to the above, Molly Ivins had this to say:

' For having the sheer effrontery to point out the painfully obvious -- that there is an Israel lobby in the United States -- Mearsheimer and Walt have been accused of being anti-Semitic, nutty and guilty of "kooky academic work."

Alan Dershowitz, who seems to be easily upset, went totally ballistic over the mild, academic, not to suggest pretty boring article by Mearsheimer and Walt, calling them "liars" and "bigots."

Of course there is an Israeli lobby in America -- its leading working group is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). It calls itself "America's Pro-Israel Lobby," and it attempts to influence U.S. legislation and policy '.

And Tony Judt, writing for the New York Times, said this:

In its March 23rd issue the London Review of Books, a respected British journal, published an essay titled "The Israel Lobby."

The authors are two distinguished American academics (Stephen Walt of Harvard and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago) who posted a longer (83-page) version of their text on the Web site of Harvard's Kennedy School.

As they must have anticipated, the essay has run into a firestorm of vituperation and refutation. Critics have charged that their scholarship is shoddy and that their claims are, in the words of the columnist Christopher Hitchens, "slightly but unmistakably smelly." The smell in question, of course, is that of anti-Semitism.

This somewhat hysterical response is regrettable. In spite of its provocative title, the essay draws on a wide variety of standard sources and is mostly uncontentious.

But it makes two distinct and important claims.

The first is that uncritical support for Israel across the decades has not served America's best interests. This is an assertion that can be debated on its merits.

The authors' second claim is more controversial: American foreign policy choices, they write, have for years been distorted by one domestic pressure group, the "Israel Lobby."

Those wishing to gain further understand of AIPAC / The Israel Lobby, need only access the numerous sources online and elsewhere.

The following link might provide a start:
www.realjewnews.com...

The link is once again to Brother Nathanael Kapner's (a jew) site

It's overflowing with little known information about what is really going on in US politics .. what has taken place in US politics .. who appears to call the shots in US politics.

Jewish Brother Nathanael Kapner states quite boldly:
' US State Department is run by Jews '

and he names them

Of interest are posts in the Comment Box:

' I was in the state department under Colin Powell - nearly every undersecretary was either jewish or under jewish control - it was tragic to see such ill conceived ideas be promulgated to force the USA to create the Iraq war based solely on lies - the lies of which brought one of the authors of these lies, condi rice, to remove powell in bush’s 2nd term. Too much to bear - I, as well as hundreds more, left in disgust.'

Someone else states their name and invites the public to watch a 2 min. You Tube video: www.youtube.com...

And a third, posted just a month ago left this post, again inviting the public to view You Tube videos:

Carter: “US Candidates MUST do as Israel says”

technorati.com...

youtube.com...

You say you reside in UK. Then you cannot claim to be unaware of the total and utter domination of the British media by jews.

We're talking print, televised and other media. In virtually every case, a jew is at the helm.

Even the BBC's religious programming head is a jew !

For a list of jew controlled media in Britain, citing positions and names:
newsfromthewest.blogspot.com...

As in America, Jews have an almost total grip on the both the electronic and printed media in Britain, and consequently shape ‘public opinion’ and government policy by simply choosing which news they wish to disseminate, and in what manner.

In this way, they have promoted the ‘multicultural and multiracial’ policy of Third World immigration and ‘anti-racism’ for so long, that they have nearly succeeded in demonizing even the slightest opposition to such policies.

Jews comprise between 2% and 3% of the total population of the United States and approx. the same proportion of the UKs population.

HOW do you explain the staggeringly disproportionate number of jews in American politics ? How do you explain the fact that jews control the British media (and basically all media, worldwide, in addition to the publishing industry, movies, tv, etc.) ?

And to learn who controls the US media (and publishing, music industry, etc.):
www.rense.com...

It's all out there. I found all these sources in less than half an hour. If you're as interested as you claim, 'Jokei' then I'm sure you could do likewise.

reply to post by Shocka

This video along with her comments on Hardball really paint a good picture of what her political views and views of this country are.

On the same show Chris Mathews claimed Bill Ayers terrorism was a legitimate form of protest. So, I don't think you can base your outrage on what Hardball told you.

Personally, I agree with everything she said. If Obama gets in with a democrat congress and democrat controlled media, they will undoubtedly move this country in to full on socialism. If that isn't anti-American, I don't know what is,

This is interesting, pertaining to Obama and indirectly to the second video here in this thread, during which the incomprehensible 'interviewer' somehow managed to sabotage attempts by Michele Bachmann to respond to his questions:

www.realjewnews.com...

from jewish Brother Nathanael Kapner's site again



This article is entitled: ' The Hand Pulling Obama's Biggest Strings'

and then it goes on to name those who're the power behind Obama

with additional articles, such as: “Brzezinski, Obama, & Their Zionist Bankers”

and much more


In the second video provided here in this thread, the interviewer mentioned a number of influential Chicago 'businessmen' in relation to Obama and then pressed Michele Bachmann to express her opinion of them. She responded by suggesting the interviewer ask the 'Chicago businessmen' himself. Which is the only intelligent response to deliberate and public baiting.

Jewish Brother Nathanael Kapner on the other hand pulls no punches .. tells it as it is.

Brother Nathanael's site again is: www.realjewnews.com...

reply to post by Dock6


That's really sad. This woman is the best example of what the garbage being strewed about by the right has done to some people.

This woman is not a real american, she is a beacon for everything that has gone wrong in America. She is a traitor to this wonderful country and all it has ever stood for, like so many of the people I see wrapped in flags calling themselves patriots. Talk about sheepole, these folks have to be the poster child.

reply to post by damwel



Number One: not for one split second do I believe you're 'an old patriotic American'

Two: your post is utterly unconvincing, in my opinion. You don't sound genuine, to me. To me, your post sounds almost as if you're reading it from a palm-card.

Are you ?

reply to post by Dock6


Dock6 please be a little conscientious on some of the links that you post. Some of us may want a little warning when some of the more unsavory sites are linked.

Perhaps a NSFW tag?

This Bachman video is hilarious! George W. makes her wet her Grand Old Panties!--


I'm not a fan but at least she voted against the bailout.


She probably had Bush sign her faked diploma from clown college.

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Moonsouljah]

reply to post by Dock6


Thanks for refuting her obviously McCarthy-like statements by attacking Jews. People like you only need to speak to reveal you prejudices. The fact that this woman is a fundamentalist should scare anyone concerend with protecting the constitution. You are her base and yes, most Americans are SCARED of YOU.

ColoradoJens

Originally posted by Dock6
This is interesting, pertaining to Obama and indirectly to the second video here in this thread, during which the incomprehensible 'interviewer' somehow managed to sabotage attempts by Michele Bachmann to respond to his questions:

www.realjewnews.com...

from jewish Brother Nathanael Kapner's site again

'Realjew'? Is that like Palin's 'real America'?

Is there news about fake Jews? Fake news about fake Jews for fake Jews?

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Merriman Weir]

reply to post by Merriman Weir



You'd need to address that question directly to the Jewish Brother Nathanael Kapner, wouldn't you ? It's his site and presumably he chose the title for his site. And as a jew, it makes sense he might choose 'realjew' ... no ?

Sorry chap, not reading anything. I call em as I em and this one is easy to call. Typical of you righties to question my patriotism, and frankly it's getting really old and isn't effective anymore as McCain's poll numbers show. You can't "Dixie Chick" me.

P.S. That's not me in my avatar either but I am a descendent of one of the mayflower pilgrims. A fellow named George Soule. You?