It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
London (CNN) -- Mass strikes began across the United Kingdom Wednesday, with up to 2 million public sector workers walking off jobs in schools, hospitals and police stations to protest proposed pension reforms.
Mass strikes began across the United Kingdom Wednesday, with up to 2 million public sector workers walking off jobs in schools, hospitals and police stations to protest proposed pension reforms.
Just in time for the Chinese 50 bps RRR cut, we get a note from Albert Edwards reminding us just why this desperate and sudden move from China comes: "We have identified a China hard landing as one of the biggest investment shocks next year."
It appears that China has already forgotten its close encounter with inflation as recent as a few months ago leading to assorted riots, and is instead far more concerned with the collapsing housing market. As a result it just announced a 50 bps reserve ratio cut, well in advance of when most commentators thought it would happen, on what is now the start of a monetary policy loosening cycle.
Yup. The rumors were all true: record sales... on negative margins. Because it is not difficult to dump product when you are, well, dumping.
Prost! or Cheers! from Germany as it becomes the European liquidity sponge. After the Chinese have lowered the reserve ratio requirements and the FED lowered the swap interest rates, thereby setting loose more easy money, German 1 year yields have reached the all-time, mind puzzling value of -0.068%. Yes that is a negative yield and it means that investors are preferring to store their money in the relative safety (and probably tax advantaged) German Treasuries even if it means that they have to pay for such a right. Although a temporary situation, it still comes to show that large institutional investors are bidding the German bund into negative territory.
Originally posted by Shenon
Watching this Lunacy from the Sidelines for now...
Here Comes The Global, US-Funded Liquidity Bail Out
This means that the global situation is far, far more dire than the talking heads have said. Luckily, when this step fails, which it will, Mars can always come and bail us out.
Indeed...
Need a reason to explain the massive central bank intervention from China, to Japan, Switzerland, the ECB, England and all the way to the US? Forbes may have one explanation: "It appears that a big European bank got close to failure last night. European banks, especially French banks, rely heavily on funding in the wholesale money markets. It appears that a major bank was having difficulty funding its immediate liquidity needs. The cavalry was called in and has come to the successful rescue." Granted the post is rather weak on factual backing and is mostly speculative, but it would certainly make sense. That said, it harkens back to our original question: just how bad was the situation if the global central banking cabal had to intervene all over again, and just what was not being told to the general public? Lastly, and most important, slapping liquidity bandaids on solvency gangrenes does nothing but buy a few days at most. Furthermore, we now expect the stigmata associated with borrowing from the Fed to haunt each and every European bank as vigilantes will now use the weekly ECB update on borrowings from the Fed as a signal to hone in on this and that weak Italian and French, pardon, European bank.
Originally posted by nonnez
So, If I am to understand the news this morning what they basically did, in so many words, was to implement another QE/TARP for the financial sector worldwide without having to rely on a vote from legislatures, congress, and the like . . . Is that right? And if so won't this just mean more trouble around the corner?edit on 30-11-2011 by nonnez because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by nonnez
So, If I am to understand the news this morning what they basically did, in so many words, was to implement another QE/TARP for the financial sector worldwide without having to rely on a vote from legislatures, congress, and the like . . . Is that right? And if so won't this just mean more trouble around the corner?edit on 30-11-2011 by nonnez because: (no reason given)
Yep. This will just delay things for a while... a week, a month, who knows.
As long as the printing presses work and new ones are installed, we're all good!
Print to infinity!
Originally posted by GoalPoster
reply to post by Shenon
Probably a lot more than just speculation if the same such information appeared in Forbes as well . . .
Big Euro Bank Failure averted?
The Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Swiss National Bank, and the Bank of Canada in a coordinated action moved to provide liquidity to the global financial system.
Ok, what the hell is going on? This is the first POMO ever cancelled in QE/Lite/Twist history. As a reminder, today the Fed was supposed to sell $8 billion in 2013 bonds: a liquidity withdrawing operation. Just how little liquidity is there in the "system"?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The end is near...
Fed Cancels POMO Due To "System Difficulties"
Ok, what the hell is going on? This is the first POMO ever cancelled in QE/Lite/Twist history. As a reminder, today the Fed was supposed to sell $8 billion in 2013 bonds: a liquidity withdrawing operation. Just how little liquidity is there in the "system"?
They did and I am stunned, outraged. Last night I read about the banks being downgraded and woke up to this. My first thought was who in the **** gave the Fed permission to do this? I sure didn't vote on this nor did my representatives. It is out of control, I am floored that this could happen. It is like patching your boat with bubble gum. The illusion they have created is so much worse in reality.
Originally posted by nonnez
So, If I am to understand the news this morning what they basically did, in so many words, was to implement another QE/TARP for the financial sector worldwide without having to rely on a vote from legislatures, congress, and the like . . . Is that right? And if so won't this just mean more trouble around the corner?edit on 30-11-2011 by nonnez because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AuntB
They did and I am stunned, outraged. Last night I read about the banks being downgraded and woke up to this. My first thought was who in the **** gave the Fed permission to do this? I sure didn't vote on this nor did my representatives. It is out of control, I am floored that this could happen. It is like patching your boat with bubble gum. The illusion they have created is so much worse in reality.
Originally posted by nonnez
So, If I am to understand the news this morning what they basically did, in so many words, was to implement another QE/TARP for the financial sector worldwide without having to rely on a vote from legislatures, congress, and the like . . . Is that right? And if so won't this just mean more trouble around the corner?edit on 30-11-2011 by nonnez because: (no reason given)
but i thought the FED could pull whatever amount of liquidity out of the print presses that they want? I dont understand this one?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by camaro68ss
but i thought the FED could pull whatever amount of liquidity out of the print presses that they want? I dont understand this one?
Well it seems they are spending faster that they can print... they'll need to install new printers tonight!
NYC to get electric truck manufacturing plant
By Channtal Fleischfresser | November 28, 2011, 4:12 AM PST
0Comments
more +
New York will soon be getting a little greener. Smith Electric, a company that makes zero-emissions commercial trucks, will be manufacturing them in the Big Apple starting in 2012.
The company already has plants in Kansas City, MO, and near Newcastle, England. NYC officials gave the company roughly $11 million in incentives to build in the city. The plant will reportedly be in the South Bronx, and the move is expected to create 100 jobs.
Smith’s all-electric trucks can travel up to 150 miles on a single charge, at less than half the annual operating cost of comparably-sized standard diesel trucks. Frito Lay has used Smith trucks, and Coca-Cola has also agreed to use them.
While a range of 150 miles is unlikely to make the truck a widespread alternative to its diesel counterpart, for companies looking to reduce their carbon footprint and to save money on short-haul routes, Smith trucks could be a viable solution.
Photo: Smith Electric
A senior German official said Wednesday that the government has approved the subsidized sale of another Dolphin-type military submarine to Israel.
The official said Germany has set aside €135 million ($180 million) in next year's budget to pay for about a third of its cost.