It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
knol.google.com
"Edgar Cayce’s View
When asked what the New Age means to humanity, Edgar Cayce replied: “the full consciousness of the ability to communicate with the Creative Forces and be aware of the relationships to the Creative Forces and the uses of same in material environs. This awareness during the era or age in the Age of Atlantis and Lemuria or Mu brought what? Destruction to man, and his beginning of the needs of the journey up through that of selfishness.” (1602-3)
"TEXT OF READING 3976-15
This psychic reading given by Edgar Cayce at the home of
Mr. and Mrs. T. Mitchell Hastings, 410 Park Avenue, New York
City, this 19th day of January, 1934, in accordance with
request made by those present.
P R E S E N T
Edgar Cayce; Hugh Lynn Cayce, Conductor; Gladys Davis, Steno.
Carolyn B. Hastings, Josephine L. B. Macsherry, T. Mitchell
Hastings. (Mrs. Hastings led in meditation, before Mr. Cayce
went to sleep.)
R E A D I N G
Time of Reading
11:40 to 12:40 A. M.
1. HLC: We seek at this time such information as will be of
value and interest to those present, including T. Mitchell
Hastings, Jr. in the next room, regarding the spiritual,
mental and physical changes which are coming to the earth.
You will tell us what part we may play in meeting and helping
others to understand these changes. At the end of each
fifteen minute period you will pause, until I tell you to
continue, while the recording instrument is being arranged.
You will speak distinctly at a normal rate of speech, and you
will answer the questions which we will ask.
2. EC: Yes; as each of you gathered here have your own
individual development, yet as each seeks to be a channel of
blessings to the fellow man, each attunes self to the Throne
of universal information. And there may be accorded you that
which may be beneficial, not only in thine own experience,
but that which will prove helpful, hopeful, in the
experience of others.
3. Many an one may question you as to the sources, as to the
channel through such information that may be given you at
this time has come. Know it has reached that which is as
high for each of you in your respective development as you
have merited, and do merit; and has accorded and does accord
to the realm of light that which may be aidful and helpful in
thine own experience, and in the experience of those that ye
in your service to thy fellow man may give unto others.
4. Hence, in giving the interpretation, MANY are present;
many of those whose names alone would bring to others awe -
discredit, yet - even a wonderment. For, not only then must
the information be instructive but enlightening; yet it must
also be so given that it may be a PRACTICAL thing in the
experience of thine own self and in the experience of life of
thine fellow man. Not only must it be informative in nature,
but it must also be that which is constructive; though
[pause] that which is informative and that which may be
enlightening and constructive must at times overlap one
another.
Cayce was also speaking of the year 1999, and then beyond too
11. I have declared this, that has been delivered unto me to
give unto you, ye that sit here and that hear and that see a
light breaking in the east, and have heard, have seen thine
weaknesses and thine faultfindings, and know that He will
make thy paths straight if ye will but live that YE KNOW this
day - then may the next step, the next word, be declared unto
thee. For ye in your weakness [pause] have known the way,
through that as ye have made manifest of the SPIRIT of truth
and light that has been proclaimed into this earth, that has
been committed unto the keeping of Him that made of Himself
no estate but who brought into being all that ye see manifest
in the earth, and has declared this message unto thee: "Love
the Lord thy God with all thine heart," and the second is
like unto it, "Love thy neighbor as thyself." Who is thine
neighbor? Him that ye may aid in whatsoever way that he, thy
neighbor, thy brother, has been troubled. Help him to stand
on his own feet. For such may only know the acceptable way.
The weakling, the unsteady, must enter into the crucible and
become as naught, even as He, that they may know the way. I,
Halaliel, have spoken."
^^^ And this ties in exactly with Nostradamus' 1999 prediction
" Cayce predicted that the so-called "Battle of Armageddon" described symbolically in the Bible would begin in 1999. Cayce foresaw that this "battle" will not be a war fought on earth. Rather, it will be a spiritual struggle between the "higher forces of light" and "lower forces of darkness" for 1000 years of earth time. The reason for this struggle is to prevent souls from lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth. By preventing souls from the lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth, only enlightened souls will be permitted to reincarnate. The result will be 1000 years of building a world of peace and enlightenment. After 1000 years, souls from lower afterlife realms will be permitted once again to reincarnate to earth. By this time, the so-called "kingdom of heaven" will have been established on earth."
Originally posted by maxweljames
Synthesist, you seem to have a decent amount of knowledge on Cayce. What is your opinion of David Wilcock and his claim to be the incarnate of Cayce?
I would have no problem with that, but please don't throw off the table other possibilities. You may be aware that the human mind is like a radio receiver in ways.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
He was in a trance, the subconcious mind answers the questions it is asked without discrimination. He couldn't just reject a question he would be asked, because he wasn't concious.
The subconcious mind is much more advanced than the concious human mind, but sometimes it can work alot like a computer, it can process many things the concious mind cannot, but it does not always have the same type of reasoning or discrimination that the concious mind does.
[edit on 23-10-2008 by Hollywood11]
The bible has nothing to do with it. Yes, the bible is a great place to read about a warped and disjointed history of mankind, but it has no license over me.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
However Edgar Cayce knew what he knew, and however he was able to go into trance, I don't see anything bad or wrong in his readings. Why does there have to be some sinister side to it? Because the bible said something you took a certain way?
Edgar Cayce's readings seem very righteous and good to me, so it makes little sense that the info would have come from somewhere bad.
How in Gods green earth can you come to this conclusion, honestly? How? Because it sounds good? In all honesty, "sounds good" doesn't cut it in a court of law. Yes, but people were helped. Sure they were, but how many have been lead down a rosy path, with no end in sight, putting money out to read a passage with a unknown and uncheckable genesis? Lets all read a book by an author with no name, and no way to check him, lets believe everything in this book, and question nothing. The author must be good because there are things in the book that are good and true, so everything else must be true too.
Edgar Cayce's readings seem very righteous and good to me, so it makes little sense that the info would have come from somewhere bad.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Can you attest to this in a court of law? Or do you base your opinion on hearsay? Ford Motor Company is a good Company, they have never shipped a "Lemon". Is that true?
However, the results of his readings were always good and helped alot of people...... So if the results were good, the information must also come from a good place. Good things cannot come from a bad source.
What is good and what isn't? Who is to say that maybe some of those people he cured were suppose to go home. By the way, not all the people were saved. A doctor prescribes a medication, you take it on faith, later that month it is discovered that the medication causes deadly side effects. Bad came from good! It doesn't mean the doctor should be blamed but rather the creators of the medication. We can go after the creators of this, but in Edgar's case, we can't.
If we want to know if the source of the information is good, all we have to do is analyze if the results and effects of knowing the information are also good.
We really don't know who may have been hurt. Obviously, it appears people were helped, but in the long run, after it comes out, there were side effects, who do we blame? A voice?
If it came from a bad source, then the results would have been bad and hurt people.
Have you ever heard of sugar coated candy? Trojan Horse? Apple with a razor blade in it? Sometimes bad things take a long time to be seen, other times the truth is just one bite away. One thing for certain, the truth no matter where it is or what type, will last forever. The truth of Edgar Cayce will be known, in time.
The same principle applies to determining what is true and not true. If an idea will have good effects in the world, we can know the idea itself is good and comes form a good place, and is therefore true. If the effects of an idea will be bad, we can then know that the source of the idea is also bad and the idea itself is therefore wrong.