It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by amigo
The big news is not the object. The big news is that something this small was detected at such a distance. Objects this size are not that uncommon but they have never before been detected before entering the atmosphere.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by amigo
The big news is not the object. The big news is that something this small was detected at such a distance. Objects this size are not that uncommon but they have never before been detected before entering the atmosphere.
[edit on 6-10-2008 by Phage]
Originally posted by edgecrusher2199
Here is what I am wondering on how this plays into October 7th. Suppose the trajectory of this thing is off and goes farther north. If the explosion of this thing is suppose to release 1 kilatons of energy combined with the iron that it contains, could it not cause an EMP like event shutting down most power in the region that it hits? That would potentially shut the Euro markets...
Originally posted by argentus
reply to post by gimme_some_truth
I hear you, and I'm sorry I didn't post to acknowledge hearing you from the beginning of this thread. Your position is scientifically sound.
I think the real story is that any object of potential damaging size was detected at a point where nothing could be done to mitigate it. I watch the NEO site pretty frequently. The variables which are employed to analyze the composition and mass of NEOs are not infalliable, nor would we expect them to be. Objects with low reflectivity and small mass [and low risk] are difficult to detect.
I don't believe it is known for certain what the outcome of this object will be -- I believe the studies indicate a high probability of no surface disturbance. That's not the same as NO probabilty, though, is it?
Makes me wonder how large of a NEO could "sneak" up on us. Suppose an iron/nickel core, low ice, perhaps rocky, low reflectivity, and...... 2 mile circumference.
Just food for thought, but I wanted to give you props for keeping us continually through this thread on the side of sensibility.
Cheers
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Imagine that. Facts and truth being a more reliable source than fear, speculation and assumption. Who would have thought that?
Originally posted by Scarcer
ah, everyone stopped talking, i suppose there watching it, i'm in WA state and i see nothing in my skys....... sad.
Originally posted by Vanitas
Originally posted by Scarcer
ah, everyone stopped talking, i suppose there watching it, i'm in WA state and i see nothing in my skys....... sad.
Everyone stopped talking LONG AGO - because there was nothing to see...
Happy now?
[edit on 6-10-2008 by Vanitas]
Originally posted by sechmet
The Minor Planet Electronic Circulars
www.cfa.harvard.edu
(visit the link for the full news article)
"Steve Chesley (JPL) reports that atmospheric entry will occur on 2008
Oct 07 0246 UTC over northern Sudan."
www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K08/K08T50.html
[edit on 6-10-2008 by sechmet]
====
Mod Edit: Headline trimmed. Full site description is here:
*(The Minor Planet Electronic Circulars contain information on unusual
minor planets and routine data on comets. They are published on behalf of Commission 20 of the International Astronomical Union by the Minor Planet Center, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory,
Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.)
[edit on 6/10/2008 by Badge01]