It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The US openly supports and forms terrorist organisations around the World yet you still point the finger at Iran when your own back yard is full of dirty laundry. Wake up and start smelling the coffee. It does not matter who likes or dislikes Iran but it does matter if Israel initiates a nuke war that engulfs the Globe and that is the bigger picture that you should be looking at.
US intelligence’s amended estimate, that Iran will be ready to build its first bomb just one month after the next US president is sworn in, is disclosed by DEBKAfile’s Washington sources as having been relayed as a guideline to the Middle East teams of both presidential candidates, Senators John McCain and Barack Obama.
The information prompted the assertion by Democratic vice presidential nominee Joseph Biden in Seattle Sunday, Oct. 19: “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy.”
DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb.
US intelligence believes Tehran has the personnel, plans and diagrams for a bomb and has been running experiments to this end for the past two years. The UN International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna last week asked Tehran to clarify recent complex experiments they conducted in detonating nuclear materials for a weapon, but received no answer.
The same US evaluation adds that the Iranian leadership is holding off its go-ahead to start building the bomb until the last minute so as to ward off international pressure to stop at the red line.
This development together with the galloping global economic crisis will force the incoming US president to go straight into decision-making without pause on Day One in the Oval Office. He will have to determine which urgent measures can serve best for keeping a nuclear bomb out of the Islamic republic’s hands - diplomatic or military – and how to proceed if those measures fail.
His knowledge of the challenge colored Sen. Biden’s additional words in Seattle: “Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”
Israel’s political and military leaders also face a tough dilemma that can no longer be put off of whether to strike Iran’s nuclear installations militarily in the next three months between US presidencies before the last window closes, or take a chance on coordination with the next president.
Waiting for the “international community” to do the job of stopping Iran, as urged by governments headed by Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert - and strongly advocated Tzipi Livni, foreign minister and would-be prime minister - has been a washout. Iran stands defiantly on the threshold of a nuclear weapon.
In an October 18, 2008 article on the Iranian website Aftab, Wahid Karimi, director of the Europe and U.S. department in Iran's Foreign Ministry, recommends that Iran mark London as a target, since it is the capital of the country that is the U.S.'s closest ally in Europe. This, says Karimi, would be with the aim of ensuring that the Bush administration does not attack Iran in its final weeks, after the U.S. presidential election next month and before Bush officially leaves office on January 20, 2009.
Following are the main points of Karimi's article:
Karimi: "The Most Appropriate Means of Deterrence that Iran Has, in Addition to a Retaliatory Operation in the [Gulf] Region, Is to Take Action against London"
"... It is clear to everyone that George Bush will remain the official president of the United States until January 20, 2009. U.S. presidents are usually adventuresome in their second terms... [among them Richard] Nixon, disgraced by the Watergate scandal; [Ronald] Reagan, with the Irangate adventure; [and Bill] Clinton, with Monica Lewinsky - and perhaps George Bush, the sitting president, will create a scandal connected to Iran's legitimate nuclear activity so as not to be left behind.
"In the past, Iran has marked as a target the U.S. military bases in the Arab countries in the Persian Gulf, so as to deter American adventurism. Shortly after that, it gave the requisite warnings regarding [a possible Iranian move to] paralyze 'the Jerusalem-occupying regime [i.e. Israel],' so as to deter American adventurism...
"Although a U.S. military attack on Iran's nuclear installations is not likely... the last two months of Bush's presidency, from late November 2008 to January 20, 2009, will be the worst possible days of his presidency [for Iran, and during them he can] exploit his power to carry out political adventurism and a ill-conceived operation. If so, how can we restrain him?
"It is possible that after the next president of the United States is determined in November - that is, [either John] McCain or [Barack] Obama - Bush and the president-elect will reach an agreement about an ill-conceived operation against Iran.
"In the worst-case scenario, George Bush may perhaps persuade the president-elect to carry out an ill-conceived operation against Iran, prior to January 20, 2009 - that is, before the regime is handed over and he ends his presence in the White House. The next president of the U.S. will have to deal with the consequences...
"If we agree that such a scenario - with America, England and Israel at its center - is conceivable, then it would seem that the most appropriate means of deterrence that Iran has, in addition to a retaliatory operation in the [Gulf] region, is to take action against London. Experience proves that the [part played] by politicians in Tel Aviv and in London, in the [fanning of the] flames against Iran and in the urging of America to strike Iran, is no less than [the part played] by Bush."
US intelligence
from your source.
In an October 18, 2008 article on the Iranian website Aftab, Wahid Karimi, director of the Europe and U.S. department in Iran's Foreign Ministry, recommends that Iran mark London as a target, since it is the capital of the country that is the U.S.'s closest ally in Europe. This, says Karimi, would be with the aim of ensuring that the Bush administration does not attack Iran in its final weeks, after the U.S. presidential election next month and before Bush officially leaves office on January 20, 2009.
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
Secondly Isreal did not ask for the palestinian crisis, nor given 1.5 Billion members of Islam is there any lack of territoty for the palestinians to occupy, they share a religion and in many ways an Identity with thier neighbors (not saying that's fair entirely) just that, Irans call for the Jews to be given land in Europe is no where near as applicable as Muslims entering other muslim states would be, particulalrly considering the sheer wealth and life style of some of those states like Dubai and Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Even Iran is, a wonderful little nation in terms of geography and lifestyle..compared to palestine
The Palestinian people are not just Muslims. If they were we would be calling the them Israeli Muslims. Palestinians are made up of Christians, Muslims and Jews. They are a people that have had their homes, schools, businesses, and family forcibly taken from them. How can you people even begin to defend a group of people that are hellbent on completely overrunning a country and its people?
The Israeli authorities normally detain the bodies of martyred Palestinians for a few days without any explanation.
The Israeli Army on December 30 killed three Palestinian boys, aged 14-15 near Khan Younis in unclear circumstances.
The army issued conflicting reports on the killing, while Palestinian sources charged that Israeli troops murdered the three unarmed boys in cold blood.
The bodies of the three boys were handed over to the Palestinians for burial on 6 January.
However, shortly before burial, Palestinian medical authorities examined the bodies and found out that the main vital organs were missing from the bodies....
"Returned from foreign labor ... without his heart." Underneath such a headline, this newspaper relates that, reduced to despair by extreme material straits, a 39-year-old Khmelnytsky resident took a job in Israel. However, the terrible news shortly arrived that he had died there of poisoning by a tainted alcoholic beverage (even though all domestic sources insist that he never drank!). The body of the unfortunate worker was returned to Ukraine for burial. However, medical experts discovered that he was missing ... his heart! At the moment, this dreadfully-inhuman affair is being investigated with the help of Interpol....
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
Further, Isreal has held the bomb for close to 40 years, it's the only reason the wars have stoped against Isreal, the Iranian Bombs only Intention... is to start the fight up again, it has no other use, Iran has no natural enemy in the region, Isreal will never invade it, has no history or precedent of attacking beyond it's borders, unlike it has been attacked.
Zionists do not represent every jew...........
And in the end your talking about, a conspiracy people believe about zionists, where Jews in total can't possible number 60 Million worldwide, let alone zionists, vs a culture of, 1.5 Billion
To claim the palestinians have no options but the "zionists" do, a people who have been displaced, dozens of times not one, is really also absurd.
Ah I see, because there are so "few" Jewish that gives them the right to bomb Iran
I think what the REAL Issue is, there are so few Jews and they have so little power, people are willing to sacrifice them, purely because they fear a war with Islam, it becomes easy to, simply, allow them to burn and end the problem.
Originally posted by dooper
The only way the Iranian threat is different, is that Iran is pursuing nuclear material, and the Iranian rhetoric indicates clearly their intent to get the bomb to carry out their threat.
Alot of idiots think that Israel isn't a threat when it has threatned Iran to war. Hmmmm very foolish.
It takes a complete idiot to believe that Iran is not a major, impending threat to the entire region, and as specifically pointed out, Israel. Some folks don't like reality, but it doesn't change reality. And tomorrow, the situation will be the same.
Originally posted by jakyll
reply to post by Rook1545
When the name calling starts and the accusations of racism fly,then you know you're on the right path.
Its easy for the truth to be ignored when its branded anti-semitic.
I just don't understand how people can condemn certain countries,yet when shown the evidence of Israel's actions they suddenly become blind and mute.