It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tulpas
Tulpa (Wylie: sprul-pa) is a Vajrayana, Bonpo and Tibetan Buddhist upaya concept, discipline and teaching tool. The term was first rendered into English as 'Thoughtform' by Evans-Wentz (1954: p.29):
Inasmuch as the mind creates the world of appearances, it can create any particular object desired. The process consists of giving palpable being to a visualization, in very much the same manner as an architect gives concrete expression in three dimensions to his abstract concepts after first having given them expression in the two-dimensions of his blue-print. The Tibetans call the One Mind's concretized visualization the Khorva (Hkhorva), equivalent to the Sanskrit Sangsara; that of an incarnate deity, like the Dalai or Tashi Lama, they call a Tul-ku (Sprul-sku), and that of a magician a Tul-pa (Sprul-pa), meaning a magically produced illusion or creation. A master of yoga can dissolve a Tul-pa as readily as he can create it; and his own illusory human body, or Tul-ku, he can likewise dissolve, and thus outwit Death. Sometimes, by means of this magic, one human form can be amalgamated with another, as in the instance of the wife of Marpa, guru of Milarepa, who ended her life by incorporating herself in the body of Marpa."[
Originally posted by Malzypants
I think you may want to consider this from another point of view.
If people are coming to this attraction, they obviously enjoy being scared. They become happy because of the adrenaline rush. Considering this medium, I wouldn't be too concerned about attracting anything negative.
Originally posted by Enigma Publius
Originally posted by Malzypants
I think you may want to consider this from another point of view.
If people are coming to this attraction, they obviously enjoy being scared. They become happy because of the adrenaline rush. Considering this medium, I wouldn't be too concerned about attracting anything negative.
who are u and where have u been all my life? maybe it's the sleep depravation, but in the last few minutes, i have read two posts by you that completely sum everything up in only a coupla sentences. YOU MAKE WAY TOO MUCH SENSE FOR THIS SITE!
be my friend! i need someone like you to help ground me on some of these threads, and i am not kissing butt or exagerating, you have impressed me very much. the more time you spend here you will see just how rare it is that someone sees the question at hand so clearly and poses soulutions with such ease. in this case it wasn't a solution, but a fatal flaw in theory you pointed out that i gurantee had escaped EVERYONE until now. Cool on you!
Originally posted by Malzypants
I think you may want to consider this from another point of view.
If people are coming to this attraction, they obviously enjoy being scared. They become happy because of the adrenaline rush. Considering this medium, I wouldn't be too concerned about attracting anything negative.
Originally posted by Mav3rick
Originally posted by Malzypants
I think you may want to consider this from another point of view.
If people are coming to this attraction, they obviously enjoy being scared. They become happy because of the adrenaline rush. Considering this medium, I wouldn't be too concerned about attracting anything negative.
I do see your point, however I think this is true to a certain extent. I don't think everyone "enjoys" it. I was running chainsaws and was the last barrier to the exit. I couldn't tell you how many people I saw who were utterly terrified and in tears.
There is a wide spectrum of emotion that I saw. There were some who were laughing, some who were pretty indifferent, and then those that were about to have a psychotic meltdown.
Just because someone chooses to experience fear, does that transform it from a negative to a positive emotion? I would think that fear would still provide an environment for negative things to become attracted to.
[edit on 5-10-2008 by Mav3rick]