Huge Antenna-Like Structure On The Moon!

reply to post by Phage


In this Lunar Orbiter image of the Reiner Gamma area, it doesn't look quite as flat as in the b/w image you posted:



Link to full image at Lunar and Planetary Institute:
www.lpi.usra.edu...

reply to post by ziggystar60


The image I posted is derived from LIDAR elevation data which provides 40m vertical resolution so yes, it is a pretty flat area.
Very high resolution imaging from Clementine is available HERE

[edit on 6-10-2008 by Phage]

reply to post by mikesingh


i looked very closely at it. it's interesting. i think i see the right side of it, going away from the viewer, and it's been obscured by shadow. err no, i just looked again and it's not what i thought it was. nevermind

[edit on 6-10-2008 by undo]

Originally posted by Phage
I'm "public".

I really doubt that... but as you recently pointed out in another thread, they don't listen. We showed all the links to those color images in 2006 when they were released in the Clementine thread...

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by mikesingh
The remainder 80% of the images were never disclosed to the public! Hmmm...Fishy, what?

But then some of us are not 'public'

The above image is 10% of the actual size... for you the public

So then how about showing the remainder 90% of the 'non public' image? There could be some hidden treasure there!!

Cheers!

Just a quick question Mike, have you ever tried questioning NASA about these anomalies.
I would be interested to see their point of view or some kind of researcher logic on these many artifact like structures faces etc.

Originally posted by seridium
Just a quick question Mike, have you ever tried questioning NASA about these anomalies.
I would be interested to see their point of view or some kind of researcher logic on these many artifact like structures faces etc.

Yep!

1. Rocks.
2. Light and shade effects.
3. Glitches in the image.
4. And so on!

NASA? Never A Straight Answer!!

Cheers!

Figures lol, it is too bad N.A.S.A doesn't come clean on most of their cover up etc.

It would be a great day if it was so.

reply to post by mikesingh


Could you please tell us who were the persons you contacted?

The only time I contacted a NASA person I got a straight answer.

And those answers you got are straight answers, they are just not the ones you would like to get, right?

reply to post by ArMaP


Check it out with zorgon! He's got a list as long as his arm. One says that it's just rocks, but the image is INTERESTING! What the...?

Cheers!

reply to post by mikesingh


I know Zorgon has a long list, what I would like to know was the ones you contacted and, if possible, about what, so I could try my luck.

As I said before, the only time I contacted someone from NASA (Jim Garvin, about that Powerpoint presentation) he gave me a straight answer.

The antannea is part of a base called Luna, John Lear's been sreamin about it for years!
Check out the link:
Secret bases on the dark side of the Moon

Or check out the ATS Thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 9-10-2008 by starsyren]

Originally posted by starsyren
The antannea is part of a base called Luna, John Lear's been sreamin about it for years!

"Screaming about it" does not make it real.

If he (or anyone else) can provide real photos or other evidence of that, fine, until then it's just another unproved theory.

I try to keep a very open mind with regards to all things. There are most certainly facts that are kept ummm...shall we say "contained".
Sometimes though gentlemen a cigar is just a cigar.
Honestly this structure appears to be nothing more than a blemish in the image.

reply to post by ziggystar60


Maybe this higher resolution version (taken from the Lunar Orbiter Digitization Project) can show you that this is really a flat feature.

< br />
Click the image to see the original 1404x966 pixels image.

reply to post by ArMaP


Thanks, ArMaP.
You are right, the area definetely looks quite flat in the image you posted.

Originally posted by mikesingh
The remainder 80% of the images were never disclosed to the public! Hmmm...Fishy, what?

Are you sure?

I have never counted the images (I may be crazy, but not that much ), but the images we see are made with several smaller images, and the fact that they took photos in six different wavelengths also creates a larger number of images, remember that the colour images are really three images in one.

If we had a list we could know which images were used and which images were missing, do you know of such a list?

Edited to change "five different wavelengths" to the correct "six different wavelengths".

[edit on 11/10/2008 by ArMaP]

To me the photos appear to be of the car keys I have misplaced. I have no idea how they got up there.

Originally posted by zorgon
My favorite is this one

Is this one from the "non public", 100% version?

It looks too small to be a 100% (when compared with the 'clips') and too big when compared with the first image.

From the public files, "my" version of Reiner Gamma.

It may not be the 100% version (or maybe it is), but it's much better than the previously posted "public" version.

You have to click the image to see it in it's full size.