It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fang
Well I think it's best to call it a day; You say there are no Western Satellites over Northern Russia, I say there are.
I say no russian Aircraft has arrived at UK airspace over the last 30 years without being detected and tracked first, you say different.
As for NORAD and the 9/11 inquiry, you are just plain wrong. Perhaps you need to widen your sources, Fox News and What Happened Next?. Hmmm.
Originally posted by Skelkie3
No one got shot down ? Cat and mouse ?
Can't tell you why I know... but- lot's of people got shot down.
I think you are right about the purpose of this mission... if it happened at all.
Originally posted by aaa2500
As for the silly idea that the Blackjack is a poor copy of the Lancer, it falls in the same territory as the Buran being a poor copy of the US shuttles and propably hundreds of other stories like it, it shows that some people have no idea how aircraft are designed.
I never said it was a poor copy, just that they are similar, you can't really dispute that.
And as for the Buran.....well it never even flew as a manned spacecraft. And it did borrow heavily from ideas of the U.S. Space Shuttle.
Just for the Record the West borrows from Russian Tech too.
I don't see anything wrong with copying an existing weapon and modifying / improving on it.
The Blackjack and Buran were not revolutionary departures from the the B1 and Space Shuttle.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
They have retired the nighthawks. So sitting in a boneyard would make them quite useless.
As for the B-2 we know they have flown to within 5miles of moscow before with out detection.
And the blackjack is an enlarged copy of the original B-1 that Carter scrapped. So how can it be the most advanced bomber in the world when it was copied on 30 year old tech.
Originally posted by pavil
Just for the Record the West borrows from Russian Tech too. If memory serves me correct the U.K. developed Chobham explosive reactive armor in response to a similar Soviet development.
Originally posted by homo_borg
Well, it IS still currently the most advanced bomber in the world. We all know how useless F-117s are. We could only surmise how the B2 would fail miserably against Russian defences.
And the blackjack is an enlarged copy of the original B-1 that Carter scrapped. So how can it be the most advanced bomber in the world when it was copied on 30 year old tech.
The F-117 is a fighter, not a bomber.
Originally posted by PhilltFred
The F-117 is a fighter, not a bomber. And if true to form, there are other even more advanced aircraft will in deep black that has yet to see the light of Jane's Defence Weekly.
Originally posted by StellarX
reply to post by primamateria
Somewhere between RAF inefficiency, budget cuts for the RAF, a LO design for the Blackjack it's very high speed and the basic limitations of radar will you find a answer to that question. If you care to do so, and thus reject the notion that the Russians are entirely backwards, you can even throw in 'Plasma Stealth' to help explain why these sort of things are now so often happening to NATO partners....
Stellar