Anyone talking about this Robert Clarke freak?

...finally telling the truth ( and not having a neo-fascist hyper Cover Our Azzes episode at the slightest pulling back of the curtain- as in your threads subject line), which you have in Clarke.

Originally posted by Bout Time
...finally telling the truth.

This could be the most dangerous thing to my crusade against the repugnants...they finally tell the truth!

Originally posted by Bout Time
...finally telling the truth ( and not having a neo-fascist hyper Cover Our Azzes episode at the slightest pulling back of the curtain- as in your threads subject line), which you have in Clarke.

Then why is all of his testimony being discredited?

Why are all the lies he has told being exposed?

There are good Republicans out there, Clarke is not one of them.

I've seen the testimony ( www.cspan.org ), have read today's papers, read expert testimonials....nothing is being refutated by any source of substance.

LOL Yes, Clarke is telling the truth.

At the hearing, Republican commissioner James R. Thompson, a former Illinois governor, held up Clarke's book and a text of the briefing and challenged the witness, "We have your book and we have your press briefing of August 2002. Which is true?"

Originally posted by kramtronix
LOL Yes, Clarke is telling the truth.

At the hearing, Republican commissioner James R. Thompson, a former Illinois governor, held up Clarke's book and a text of the briefing and challenged the witness, "We have your book and we have your press briefing of August 2002. Which is true?"

The guy said he spun the press briefing to put the president in a good light...LIKE HE'S DONE FOR ALL THE PRESIDENTS HE'S WORKED FOR. It was part of his job to spin.

He admitted that he's a liar. That's what he did.

wah wah wahhhhh

this guy has close personal ties with the kerry campaign. or should i start calling kerry the dick tracy villian, "the chin".

Rally now, get off him he's ugly....but Bush is uglier...so what?


Chimps everywhere have volunteered for extra Lab duty just so they're not mistaken for Bush anymore.

Fury, where are the ties? I have looked for them twice and cannot locate them. A little help please.

saw it on a speech last night.
forgot where i saw it tho.
too busy envoying the sight of bbq's hamas leader

Originally posted by Fury
saw it on a speech last night.
forgot where i saw it tho.
too busy envoying the sight of bbq's hamas leader

Yeah, I saw Bush sacrificing a baby last night at the altar of Satan. Forgot what program I watching...too busy training my dog...

Originally posted by Fury
saw it on a speech last night.
forgot where i saw it tho.
too busy envoying the sight of bbq's hamas leader

Oh, you mean the part where CLarke said under oath in the chambers that he would not accept an official position wioth the Kerry administration if he won? That part?

Repugnants just LYING all the time.

Originally posted by Bout Time
Rally now, get off him he's ugly....but Bush is uglier...so what?


Chimps everywhere have volunteered for extra Lab duty just so they're not mistaken for Bush anymore.

come on man...





you know i'm not new..

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Fury
saw it on a speech last night.
forgot where i saw it tho.
too busy envoying the sight of bbq's hamas leader

Oh, you mean the part where CLarke said under oath in the chambers that he would not accept an official position wioth the Kerry administration if he won? That part?

Repugnants just LYING all the time.

clarke is done with public service anyway.
lmao.
he has ties because his friend holds position in the kerry wanna be cabinent

Originally posted by kramtronix
LOL Yes, Clarke is telling the truth.

At the hearing, Republican commissioner James R. Thompson, a former Illinois governor, held up Clarke's book and a text of the briefing and challenged the witness, "We have your book and we have your press briefing of August 2002. Which is true?"

"DeceptiveConservative" - aren't you all? Though, neo-fascist is much more accurate.

Forward the stream to 59:15 for when GOP flack Thompson enters the realm of drama-based-attempt-to-save-Dubya; This is after no other Republican chose to go partisan or dirty the proceedings with Bush sycophantcy. Watch, and you'll see where your Republican talking point was partially taken from.
The sad thing is that your "idols" who partially list these half truths as whole facts leave you no ammo to retort once you've been called on the deception.

rtsp://cspanrm.fplive.net/cspan/archive/ter/ter032404_cmsnpm.rm

If not that link, go to www.cspan.org

Originally posted by Fury

Originally posted by Bout Time
Rally now, get off him he's ugly....but Bush is uglier...so .

come on man...





you know i'm not new..

Ok, this was funny.

**"come on Curious George, give me monkey lips....c'mon......

GOOD BoY!!**

Originally posted by kramtronix

Originally posted by goose
If all these people who continue to believ Bush's lies would wake up and see that everytime that anyone says anything negative about Bush then the Bush administration uses the same tactic over and over, Well they were angry because they did not get promoted and thats why they said that, he was fired from his job so thats why he said that. So everyone is lying on poor President Bush, why?

The only people coming out with these claims are the people who feel "wronged" by the administration.

I think you answered your own question.

If I want to believe the load of BS coming from the Bush Adminsitration then yes I have answered my own question, but I thought I had made it clear I do not believe it. I don't believe that everyone is telling lies on the Bush administration, I believe they are telling the truth on the Bush administration. You know this happened on Dubya's watch, he was so busy trying to find an excuse to invade Iraq that he ignored the warnings. I keep hearing people say they are glad that he was the President when this happened instead of Al Gore, the truth is, had Al Gore been President he might have taken the warnings seriously and 911 might not have happened.

Are you going to deny that Clarke has a political agenda???

Just answer that question.