Occult NWO masterplan: fascist globalization & depopulation

So few occultists are dominating a retarded population. Occultist know that as long as the general population is amazed & retarded by magic-shows, porn, and other worthless amusements commonly seen on the corporate TV channels, they (those few occultists) may continue to dominate the great amount of people, who blindly support them:

Occult NWO masterplan: fascist globalization & depopulation



About video:

From: teabowbraine. READ THIS! Lyndon LaRouche 'Tragedy & Hope' address in Washington D.C. on May 7, 2008. LaRouche talked about Obama getting the nomination and the evil mindset behind the "Lisbon Treaty" to create a British-European totalitarian superstate.

The brilliant, but wicked and evil spirited occult New World Order masterplan is unfolding. The ultimate goal of globalization (or globalisation) through propaganda and rhetoric (War on Terror) and initiating chaos that will lead to depopulation (genocide).

Under the energy of Venus and the Sun, the occult NWO masterplan must be realized by 2013. (that is, by Gregorian calendar date December 22, 2013 following another ritual circle around the Sun (starting in Solar Maximum year =2012) counting from December 22, 2012. (= end date of Mayan Long Count Calendar 13.00.00 Baktun).

It takes 243 years for Venus to return to the exact point where it started. It's called a Venus Round. And they (Illuminati), determined the creation of the NWO in 1770, with Rothschild and Adam Weishaupt as the real "founding fathers."

1770 was the year in which a new cycle of 242 years started, sectioned in 99,11,121,11 = 242 years! (=11x9, 99:9, 11x11, 121:11) (sequence= x9,:9,x11,:11 = ratio 9/11)

Right now we are living in the ':11 stage', meaning the LAST 11 years from SolarMax to SolarMax, starting from 2001 (WTC attack) to 2012.

11:11 as deceptive symbolism, means nothing more than the completion of their NWO in the last solar maximum cycle to 2012 with the start of their NWO in the new year 2013.

In 2013 there will have been a complete Venus Round of 243 years counting from 1770, and in THEIR (Illuminati/Elite) minds, the celebration of a new "spiritual era" but not in the sense as you think it will be, but with a "New Rome" represented by the United Nations (UN)/NATO in the spirit of ancient Babylon. The true meaning of the City and Tower of Babel.

We are still living under the Anglo-American World Empire. The key London oligarchs, bankers, the House of Windsor and those in alliance with them (who brought the Nazi system into power, starting in the 1920s) are still dominating the political-occult ruling Elite, of which the Bilderberg group.

Is it any coincidence the NEXT official summer Olympic Games will be held in 2012 and in the City of London? No.

In their arrogance, convinced that by 2012 Europe will have become that socialist/fascist superstate and the global NWO (European Union/North American Union (SPP)(EU/NAU) will be a fact, they will celebrate the historical Venus rising and transit on Solar Maximum 2012 with a Nazi-Germany style Olympic Games (Berlin -1936) in order to demonstrate the power and reality of this New World Order and their supporters to the entire world.

It's ALL symbolism!

The political-occult NWO endgame masterplan was executed in the year 2000, or the year zero (00) when George W. Bush became president-elect on December 13, 2000 which is the Julian calendar date for our Gregorian winter solstice calendar date December 22.

The capture of Saddam Hussein on that exact date, December 13, 2003, was well planned ahead and NO coincidence either.

The political-occult ruling European Elite arranged the deceptive "Lisbon Treaty" -which should make Europe a totalitarian superstate- to be signed on that exact date, December 13, 2007, which is NO coincidence either.

As was foreseen, after Ireland rejected this tre

Originally posted by NewsAndHistory
So few occultists are dominating a retarded population. Occultist know that as long as the general population is amazed & retarded by magic-shows, porn, and other worthless amusements commonly seen on the corporate TV channels, they (those few occultists) may continue to dominate the great amount of people, who blindly support them:

I didn't see YouTube, the source of your information, listed among "other worthless amusements". Was that on purpose or just an oversight to be ignored by the "retarded population"?

[edit on 26-9-2008 by thrashee]

Well, I've Flagged and Starred this

it's not that far wrong. And this information has been around for at least a hundred years. Only thing it fails to include are those of the 'race' or 'religion' (they never seem to be able to make up their mind just what they comprise) responsible. The OP has chosen the path of discretion (or it would never have seen light of day) to nominate a 'european' ruling-elite as responsible. I'd call them something far less complimentary. And they're not 'european' either, although they've infiltrated europe, its fortunes, its finances and been behind virtually every war. They also dominate US politics and finances. And control the media and publishing worlds.

You, naturally, have something to back up all this fascinating truth of which you are privy?

Originally posted by thrashee

Originally posted by NewsAndHistory
So few occultists are dominating a retarded population. Occultist know that as long as the general population is amazed & retarded by magic-shows, porn, and other worthless amusements commonly seen on the corporate TV channels, they (those few occultists) may continue to dominate the great amount of people, who blindly support them:

I didn't see YouTube, the source of your information, listed among "other worthless amusements". Was that on purpose or just an oversight to be ignored by the "retarded population"?

[edit on 26-9-2008 by thrashee]

Youtube works both ways friend.I have said it once,and I will say it again.THank god for youtube.It really does even the playing field for equality in information.The mainstream media has failed our Republic.But they still get their shot on youtube,with and without bias.Anybody reaserching a specific topic can get totally disparate views,which is important.edited to say:''good post buddystarred and flagged.

[edit on 103030p://3417 by daeoeste]

Reply to Thrashee


Sure do. It's difficult to avoid for anyone whose read anything stronger than comic-books and girlie magazines. It's been out there for over a hundred years and is no secret at all.

But I don't do lazy peoples homework for them.

I expect them to step away from instant gratification technology and do some research. Only then will they value what they learn. If they're spoon fed (which many appear to believe is their entitlement) they don't bother getting their brain out of low gear and try to place smart-guy in fora by 'debunking' (mindlessly opposing) pearls cast to them by those who actually have done the research.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by Dock6]

Originally posted by daeoeste
Youtube works both ways friend.I have said it once,and I will say it again.THank god for youtube.It really does even the playing field for equality in information.The mainstream media has failed our Republic.But they still get their shot on youtube,with and without bias.Anybody reaserching a specific topic can get totally disparate views,which is important.

You don't need YouTube to get disparate views. Regardless, the big gotcha here is verifiability. It's the exact same problem with using Wikipedia for your research, and no self-respecting researcher (nor instructor) allows this as a sole source.

So! Let's see some other, more credible sources rolling in, please!

reply to post by thrashee



Again, why not kill the laziness, smart-aleck bug and do some research yourself ?

Originally posted by Dock6
Sure do. It's difficult to avoid for anyone whose read anything stronger than comic-books and girlie magazines. It's been out there for over a hundred years and is no secret at all.

But I don't do lazy peoples homework for them.

I expect them to step away from instant gratification technology and do some research. Only then will they value what they learn. If they're spoon fed (which many appear to believe is their entitlement) they don't bother getting their brain out of low gear and try to place smart-guy in fora by 'debunking' (mindlessly opposing) pearls cast to them by those who actually have done the research.

Darn skippy.Couldn't have said it better myself.During the debates I was given a ''shut up''by an Obama supporter that would have made Bill O'Rielly proud.People do not want to believe that they fell for a lie.They do not want to do their own research.

People do not want to believe that they fell for a lie.They do not want to do their own research.

Yes, there are those aplenty


And there are those who're employed and/or otherwise rewarded for doing their best to kill anything which might be construed as 'dangerous' by certain parties. Their mandate is to keep the Sheepies ignorant. And I loathe them ... deeply.

You don't need YouTube to get disparate views. Regardless, the big gotcha here is verifiability. It's the exact same problem with using Wikipedia for your research, and no self-respecting researcher (nor instructor) allows this as a sole source.

So! Let's see some other, more credible sources rolling in, please!

You are right.It is only one way to get information.But it does point out other avenues of research that you can investigate further.The point is to do your own research.Don't come here expecting other people to do it for you.On that note,people are going to believe what they want regardless of the pounds of research you can show them.The truth is by no means an end all for debate,and this goes for all sides of am issue.






[edit on 103030p://4817 by daeoeste]

Originally posted by Dock6
Reply to Thrashee
Sure do. It's difficult to avoid for anyone whose read anything stronger than comic-books and girlie magazines. It's been out there for over a hundred years and is no secret at all.

Oh, the ad hominems! You big meanie, you. Besides, I read them for the articles.

But I don't do lazy peoples homework for them.

It's not my homework, it's yours. After all, it was your claim. That's called the burden of proof, but you already knew that because you're so learned, right?

I expect them to step away from instant gratification technology and do some research. Only then will they value what they learn.

You mean step away from things like, um, YouTube? Good point.

If they're spoon fed (which many appear to believe is their entitlement) they don't bother getting their brain out of low gear and try to place smart-guy in fora by 'debunking' (mindlessly opposing) pearls cast to them by those who actually have done the research.

You're absolutely right. We should just accept your statements at face value, because after all, you said you've done the homework already.


[edit on 26-9-2008 by thrashee]

Originally posted by Dock6

People do not want to believe that they fell for a lie.They do not want to do their own research.

Yes, there are those aplenty


And there are those who're employed and/or otherwise rewarded for doing their best to kill anything which might be construed as 'dangerous' by certain parties. Their mandate is to keep the Sheepies ignorant. And I loathe them ... deeply.

You and me both friend.It is pointless to fall into a circular argument with these people,they know what they are doing,it is not constructive,it only serves to obfuscate an issue ad infinitum.

Originally posted by daeoeste
The point is to do your own research.Don't come here expecting other people to do it for you.

I see. So people can open up threads and make all sorts of wonderful and whacky claims, but if you challenge them to support those same claims, it's up to you, not them, to prove it.

I have in my mind a logical fallacy. Care to take a stab in the dark which one it is?

Originally posted by thrashee

Originally posted by daeoeste
The point is to do your own research.Don't come here expecting other people to do it for you.

I see. So people can open up threads and make all sorts of wonderful and whacky claims, but if you challenge them to support those same claims, it's up to you, not them, to prove it.

I have in my mind a logical fallacy. Care to take a stab in the dark which one it is?

Yes.It is up to you to do the research to decide whether or not you agree.It is called intellectual self-defense.People do say some wacky things here,but I believe that the burden of proof ultimately relies on the individual to do their own homework to see where they stand.Edited to say:the burden of proof should be on the accepted standard of belief.

[edit on 103030p://0617 by daeoeste]

Originally posted by daeoeste
Yes.It is up to you to do the research to decide whether or not you agree.It is called intellectual self-defense.People do say some wacky things here,but I believe that the burden of proof ultimately relies on the individual to do their own homework to see where they stand.Edited to say:the burden of proof should be on the accepted standard of belief.

Well, I can agree with you that ultimately, if you decide to believe something, you need to run your own background checks, so to speak, but that's not really related to burden of proof.

My main point here is that it's completely disingenuous to make claims here and then fall back on a "look it up yourself, you lazy dude" defense when support is asked for. Along similar lines, it's also disingenuous (and another logical fallacy) to assume your assertions are so obviously true that you don't have to back them up. Note that in simply asking for such evidence, I was immediately called lazy, and wonderful conspiracy jargon such as "sheeple" was tossed about.

I hate to say this,yet once again, so few know what the "occult" really is, much less who is actually controlling our governments. I'll give you one hint: IT ISN'T OCCULTISTS!!!!! :shk:

[edit on 27-9-2008 by SpeakerofTruth]

Originally posted by thrashee


My main point here is that it's completely disingenuous to make claims here and then fall back on a "look it up yourself, you lazy dude" defense when support is asked for. Along similar lines, it's also disingenuous (and another logical fallacy) to assume your assertions are so obviously true that you don't have to back them up. Note that in simply asking for such evidence, I was immediately called lazy, and wonderful conspiracy jargon such as "sheeple" was tossed about.

you have a point.There are better ways than relying on this point of calling someone lazy.But I do have to say recommending research is good for both sides.Whether they do it or not is up to them.Jst so you know,I do not accept everything this OP has to say,but I think there is some truth to it.

Originally posted by Dock6

Well, I've Flagged and Starred this

it's not that far wrong. And this information has been around for at least a hundred years. Only thing it fails to include are those of the 'race' or 'religion' (they never seem to be able to make up their mind just what they comprise) responsible. The OP has chosen the path of discretion (or it would never have seen light of day) to nominate a 'european' ruling-elite as responsible. I'd call them something far less complimentary. And they're not 'european' either, although they've infiltrated europe, its fortunes, its finances and been behind virtually every war. They also dominate US politics and finances. And control the media and publishing worlds.

I agree with Dock6 here. The 'race' or 'religion' omitted is important fundamentally however as you mentioned, the truth is here regardless of the earlier implications, which may serve (as the OP author could have been well aware) as an unnecessary barrier for more important, or should I say more current, NWO discussions.

Anyone who's been interested in this should be able to identify truths as they're read by now. If you disagree with what's been written in the OP because of you're own research then that's a different story and anyone interested in this would want to hear your findings. Yet, the amount of selfless time that goes into learning the truth, makes you also come to the realization that as much as you may like, you cannot speed anyone along faster than their willing to invest, interest wise.

We're all willing to help and teabowbraine, (the youtube account holder and author responsible for the OP worded explanation) is a good example of that. For the record, most people intrested in this have made youtube a valued resource since it is one of the best tools for sharing opinions and research. That, at the same time, is why people like teabowbraine are eventually banned from the site. Teabowbraine was literally one of the youtube leaders on this subject matter and had over 10,000 subscribers. His videos and writings we're well researched, and us who are well researched, are able to recognize this.