It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JustMike
If, then, the US President were to suspend the Constitution, indefinitely or otherwise, doesn't that mean that at that moment he no longer has the benefit of its legal authority and hence could not do anything as President?
Originally posted by JustMike
I'd also be very grateful if you could cite/link the actual documents that give the US President the right and power to suspend the Constitution
Originally posted by JustMike
For if any US President (and I'm thinking of the future and not only now) can indeed suspend the Constitution, then its "Bill of Rights" amendments would no longer apply and the power of the elected Congress would also be nil -- and I find that worrying.
Originally posted by JustMike
You have said that there are a "bunch of EOs" related to this. Does that mean these Executive Orders have greater power than the Constitution?
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
The American public has better information than Russia would ever supply
Originally posted by nyk537
There will be an election in November. Bush will be leaving office shortly after. There is nothing going on here except wild conspiracy theory. This talk of canceling the election is some of the more "out there" talk I've ever heard.
Some people amaze me with their paranoia.
Originally posted by nyk537
There will be an election in November. Bush will be leaving office shortly after. There is nothing going on here except wild conspiracy theory. This talk of canceling the election is some of the more "out there" talk I've ever heard.
Some people amaze me with their paranoia.
WASHINGTON — It was a room full of people who rarely hold their tongues. But as the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, laid out the potentially devastating ramifications of the financial crisis before congressional leaders on Thursday night, there was a stunned silence at first.
Mr. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. had made an urgent and unusual evening visit to Capitol Hill, and they were gathered around a conference table in the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
“When you listened to him describe it you gulped," said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York.
As Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and chairman of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, put it Friday morning on the ABC program “Good Morning America,” the congressional leaders were told “that we’re literally maybe days away from a complete meltdown of our financial system, with all the implications here at home and globally.”
the congressional leaders were told “that we’re literally maybe days away from a complete meltdown of our financial system, with all the implications here at home and globally.”
The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
[lists]
There goes your country.
Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this "sadly necessary." Sad, yes. Necessary? Don't make me laugh.
Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we're supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they're not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.
Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we'll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.
The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?
When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?
Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.
In liberty,
Ron Paul
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. President George W. Bush, saying "our entire economy is in danger," urged Congress to approve his administration's $700 billion bailout proposal.
)), the end is coming, could this not be the event that he will use?"
Provides that the President can declare a state of emergency that is not defined, and Congress cannot review the action for six months.SOURCE
Originally posted by nyk537
There will be an election in November. Bush will be leaving office shortly after. There is nothing going on here except wild conspiracy theory. This talk of canceling the election is some of the more "out there" talk I've ever heard.
Some people amaze me with their paranoia.
Originally posted by Ash101
So. This is the coup the Republicans were planning all along.
When Paulson saw people weren't rolling over quickly to get f@cked in the a$$, they've moved to Plan B.
Plan B-f@ck the pretense of democracy. Let's just take power. End of story.