It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by mental modulator
Ok I will bite. I wouldnt be offended by that because its true, he did say that. Hopefully it would be seen as being a restatement of what he said and not meant to say the person wearing that agreed with the statement.
I do want to remind you that McCain did apolgize for the remarks. I have two Vietnamese children and I was not offended by them because I realized he probably has moments where he feels that way. If I was beaten and tortured by a group of people it would be hard to totally forgive that.
[edit on 23-9-2008 by justsomeboreddude]
Originally posted by SectionEight
If anyone bothered to read my link way back on page one, you would see in fact kids constitutional rights are NOT forfeited at the school door. The courts already decided.
With that out of the way, and all the idiots who think the kid doesn't have free speech here silenced forever, this kid could be a poster child for an anti-liberal school movement. Every conservative in the nation would donate to a cause that beats down the blatant and rampant liberal infiltration of our school system.
lib·er·al (lbr-l, lbrl)
adj.
1.
a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
Originally posted by ninthaxis
reply to post by Solarskye
I do not see your logic here. How is something hate speech if it is true? And I do not see how this phrase is hate speech. Can you please explain yourself.
But you can't go around as an eleven year old boy with hate speech on your T-shirt whether it's true or not. And this is just my opinion.
Originally posted by SectionEight
reply to post by jimmyx
Ayers is a convicted terrorist, he is friends with Obama. Then you have all the terrorist regimes across the globe who have openly stated they want Obama as the next US President. This t-shirt exudes the truth, to say otherwise is to remain in ignorance and not to deny ignorance.
[edit on 23-9-2008 by SectionEight]
Originally posted by SectionEight
reply to post by mental modulator
Are you trying to argue that Bush is a "terrorist's best friend" like on the t-shirt? Bush killed more terrorists than anyone else so how are you going to twist that one around? Osama wanted Kerry for president last time around not Bush, your argument is ridiculous.
Ayers is a convicted terrorist, he is friends with Obama.
YOUR argument is about as solid as a pile of refried beans.
YOU made the argument that association or "friendship" equates to being PRO TERRORIST. I did not.
YOU did not bolster that line of "logic", and derailed your own argument.
INSTEAD you sailed into a completely different direction and purposefully twisted my
words.
BY your "logic" I could say both Dick and Bush both gave us high gases prices because they are both OIL MEN, friends with oil men and ultra friendly with the OPEC cartel.
Originally posted by walkinghomer
So, If my child went to school with a shirt that says, "Republicans, Home of Child Molesters" would you approve that?