2 bigfoot creatures killed and buried?

I was listening to an old Art Bell episode and a caller comes on stating that he and his buddies were hunting one morining back in 1976 and came across what they thought was a bear, they opened fire wounding the "so called bear" mortally, the small hunting party followed the creature to a plum patch and when they did; they realized it was not a bear but a male and female bigfoot type creature, The caller states to Art Bell that the male creature stood about 7 foot tall and weighing about 500 lbs and was anatomically correct and was the female who was a bit smaller and weiged less was also anatomically correct. The caller then states that he buried them down by a stream, These hunters were from the panhandle of Texas and only 5 people know about this. The only thing that draws me to this story is the caller was calm, was not nervous or stammered whatsoever and told a complete and what seems to be accurate..Has anybody ever heard this story? and what do you guys think?

I have become to realise that most Bigfoot stories that involve a Dead bigfoot, or Buried Bigfoots, are usually a hoax.

I dont think its true.

The burried thing is too convenient (but 1976 not so old is the guy remember where he burried the corpses ? bones can teach alot)

not enought details i mean he burried the corspes, so he touch the body, how about the fur and the skin ? ...see what i mean

7 foot tall 500 lbs of dead meat is a HELL of a job to move to a burial location...especially those pissing blood from the gun shots...i hope they have some TIDE magicStick stain remover with them that day...

proof, proof, proof is the modo




[edit on 18-9-2008 by LouCypher]

[edit on 18-9-2008 by LouCypher]

[edit on 18-9-2008 by LouCypher]

Opulisum, your avatar made me laugh

Onto the subject at hand.
this interview sounds convincing to say the least, but you would think that the hunter's would go back and gather dna evidence to validate.
ask yourself though, would you go back there if what you truely saw was a bigfoot?



[edit on /9/18/08 by scar]

Video is not working.

Im glad somebody saw the video as well, Im also glad you agree with the story but to answer your question about going back would be yes but only armed and with some help to exhume the remains and tell my story and confirm it to be accurate.

reply to post by RagenCajun


Cajun, Im having problems with my youtube, It doesnt play video so you can go to youtube and sesrcg for bigfoot or art bell and you should be able to locate it, Its a great story and I think you will like it...

No, no, no.

It's too soon for this.
Really it is.

- Lee

wow Lee you seemed a bit startled..what wrong?..Why is it too soon for this?

reply to post by cmd18B


Sorry but I am a bit jaded after the last Bigfoot fiasco.
I just don't want to hear about him for a few months.



- Lee

I can understand that..I was really diappointed by that whole episode as well but this sounds pretty darn believeable....

Yes, well I am always open to the possibility.
I just really need this to be confirmed before I take it seriously.

- Lee

reply to post by lee anoma


I totally agree with that. Those hoaxers really.......put a damper on the Bigfoot community.

WHY ?

this ` episode ` be they true OR false only reinforces my cynicism

assuming it was all true - a few points :

item one - ` see " bear " shoot "bear " ` really ? it does not state where the incident occurred - but according to a friend stateside - he needs a permit to shoot ONE bear

even assuming they had bear permits or were in an area where bears are unrestricted

such cavalier shooting at unidentified targets is pure idiocy - and the type of behaviour that gets other wilderness users shot ` by mistake `

item two - how did the ` presumably ` single bear ` magically split into male / female bigfoots ?

was one already dead ? being carried ???

and BTW how many shots were fired ???????????????

such inexactitude

item three - " lets bury it " ? and then what totaly ignore the incident for > 30 years

hauling out 1200lb of cryptid whould test the abilities of a 5 man hunting party

but they could have summoned assistance - taken samles or even ` trophies ` - like head / paw / foot etc

item four - when did they realise it was a ` bigfoot ` ?????????

again it does not say - but if they were aware of the bibfoot meme @ the time why didnt they act on the importance of the discovery ?

if they were ignorant of ` bigfoot ` surely they would think grorrilla or other higher primate - how many people could claim to have shot a gorrilla in the USA ?

item five - why now and why art bell ????????? what does it acheive apart from ?? well what does it acheive ??

are they going to recover the remains - if not - why not ??

sorry folks - it could be true - there is noting in the acount to verify or dismiss it - but i doubt it

as the 5 items i raise make me seriously question the tail

[edit on 19-9-2008 by ignorant_ape]

I heard the same program not long ago.
It was mighty convincing I have to admit.
I’d like to hear more about it.
For me?
If I had to put my money on the line I’d say that interview was anything but a hoax.
You can the interview on Coat to Coast - but sorry to say I can’t get it and post it without paying.
Too bad cause it's a great listen.

Hey guys..I found the video from the Art Bell Interview...One of the members did make a good and vaild point..a permit to shoot bear..good point but this was late 1976 early 1977, did permits apply then?

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by ignorant_ape

item two - how did the ` presumably ` single bear ` magically split into male / female bigfoots ?

Well, after watching the video, it appears the Bigfeet were mating.

I for one do believe this story, Thats what great about ATS, you decipher through what you think is fact and fiction.. Sure he buried any concrete evidence to show of mythical beasts but he does remember where he buried the bodies. The way he spoke to Art Bell was why I believe him, He was a cool cool customer, no stammering at all..I BELIEVE

I heard this interview a few years ago and the thing that always struck me was the hunter was most freaked out by the fact that the creature was so human-like . He feared( supposedly) that he had inadvertantly committed murder and could be charged because of the animal's humanoid aspect. A cool story regardless of it's authenticity or not.

to everyone who believes this story based on presentation and percieved credibility of the claimant , bought many bridges lately ?