It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dr Love
reply to post by Crakeur
For the record, it's not that I want to believe Meier. When I first heard about the case I watched the original interviews and I'm telling you, body language tells the story here, what movements people make when they lie and their overall demeanor, this guy was not lying.
Body language tells the ultimate truth, that is unless someone has the ability to control it, and I'm pretty sure this one-armed farmer from podunk wasn't one of those people.
What happened later with Meier I can't say, only speculate. Something stinks with this case and it's not all about Meier.
Peace
[edit on 21-9-2008 by Dr Love]
it's one thing to try and profit from something but when you set up a non-profit you are saying that you aren't in this for the money but then you ask for a percentage of earnings. doesn't that seem odd?
I'm skeptical of anyone who would put themselves over the good of mankind when it comes to something as amazing as alien contact.
I would. Why? Because there are so many people out there who want the truth. Give them the truth, give it for free.
I wouldn't keep it from them and I certainly wouldn't charge a fee to hear their message.
I might write about it later but I wouldn't withhold the message until I could capitalize on it
Billy has a message that he claims come from his alien contact. This message is taught to those who give ten percent (I think that's the going rate) of their earnings to his "charity."
If I had that message I would pass it along, free of charge.
If, at some later date, the story of how I got the message was important, I might sell myself out but not until the message was out there. I'd rather see the world change for the better than sit on a pile of cash in a land such as the one we're in now.
Within ten minutes of your wonderfully altruistic gesture, someone will steal the rights, shut you up, and make sure that you never get to share anything that they cannot make a dime off of. Maybe the MIB, the millitary, or Disney. Anyway you went about it, someone would find a way to profit off of it, and you. The only way to protect the truth of what it is would be to secure your own rights to profit immediately. Then you can decide if you want to or not. Or maybe I am just cynical in thinking that the world is one big greedy banker nowadays.
Originally posted by derekcbart
reply to post by Dr Love
Hello Dr. Love,
It is important to take into consideration that Meier was either lying in 1982/3 when the documentary "Contact" was made, or he is lying now.
In the 1983 film he is asked when the contacts began and he says (on camera and in English) that the first contact began on January 28, 1975.
www.youtube.com...
In the 2008 documentary "Silent Revolution Of Truth" Meier says that the first contact began when he was 5 years old (1942).
One of these statements is false. The first alleged contact either began in 1942 or it began in 1975.
Most police investigators will say that a person's earliest statement is usually the most truthful. If we accept this then that means his first alleged contact began on January 28, 1975.
Why would he change his story? Only Meier can answer that question, but his story has definitely changed over time and it is important to keep that in mind.
-Derek
A farmer born in the town of Bulach in the Swiss Lowlands, Eduard "Billy" Meier claims that his first alleged extraterrestrial contacts occurred in 1942 at the age of five with an elderly extraterrestrial human man named Sfath.[1] Contacts with Sfath allegedly lasted until 1953. From 1953 to 1964 Meier's alleged contacts continued with an extraterrestrial human woman named Asket.[2] Meier claims that after an eleven year break, contacts resumed again (beginning on January 28, 1975) with an extraterrestrial human woman named Semjase[3] the granddaughter of Sfath.
Originally posted by easynow
see there you go making a case that billy is lying on both counts when in fact it is not true. please stop spreading dis-info
he said he started having contact and/or messages in 1942 and was not sure what was really going on. in the documentary he say's that the contact with these beings started in 75 meaning that he was receiving more clear messages and actually met with Semjase.
So, I'm sorry, but your interpretation of Meier's timeline discrepancies between the two films is simply incorrect.
Edit - Your wikipedia posting came in while I was writing this post. The wikipedia timeline is NOT what Meier says in "The Silent Revolution Of Truth".
Originally posted by rocksarerocks
Yes.
2nd line not necessary.
Originally posted by Dr Love
The fact that some of the Meier photos are so obviously faked should set off alarm bells. Those photos were made to look that ridiculous, that is a sign of intention. If Meiers actually made those photos, and I personally don't believe he had anything to do with them, then he made them under extreme duress. Duress could include threats to he and his family, not wanting to endure ridicule anymore, or a combination thereof.
Peace
[edit on 21-9-2008 by Dr Love]
What happened later with Meier I can't say, only speculate. Something stinks with this case and it's not all about Meier.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by easynow
what i want to know is...what is he saying ?
"Yes its good" at the beginning.... then 'okay' when he zooms back out and 'Ganz' = 'completely' which in this case means all the way out (zoom)