Pearl Harbour No 'BOMBS'

I read in a number of different books along with a Eric Phelps lecture that during the Pearl Harbour attacks there were no Japanese bombs actually shot at the US ships. Most of the ships had planted explosives in them ? What do you people tinker ?

[edit on 8-9-2008 by SparkOfLife]

Originally posted by SparkOfLife
I read in a number of different books along with a Eric Phelps lecture that during the Pearl Harbour attacks there were no Japanese missiles actually shot at the US ships. Most of the ships had planted explosives in them ? What do you people tinker ?

You need to learn your history. THERE WERE NO MISSILES AT PEARL HARBOR. Missiles were not invented until late in WW2. The Japanese BOMBED Pearl Harbor. There is NEWS FOOTAGE of it. NO WE DID NOT BLOW UP OUR OWN SHIPS.

Deny Ignorance! Don't spread it around and wallow in it.

[edit on 9-8-2008 by groingrinder]

C'mon, just like we didn't blow up our own buildings ?





..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link



[edit on 8-9-2008 by 12m8keall2c]

You can watch newsreel footage of the planes dropping the bombs. You can watch the bombs fall and explode on the ships and planes. Are you blind? Is that it? You cannot see?

Well I know and have spoken to people who were there on that day.
And Japanese planes surely bombed everything.
However who's to say they were actually Japanese in them?
Except for the fact that they had Japanese signs on them and the ones that crashed had Japanese pilots in them.

Originally posted by SparkOfLife
during the Pearl Harbour attacks there were no Japanese MISSILES actually shot at the US ships.
[edit on 8-9-2008 by SparkOfLife]

My god. What nonsense are they teaching in the schools now. The Japanese used Missiles in WWII? Thats a new one. I supposes they guided the missiles to their respective targets on Battleship Row with a laser / satellite targeting system too. And let me guess, somehow, some way, Bush 41 was involved in the plot?

This thread moves to the top of my "not-so-official" top ten list of "you've gotta' be kidding me" topics.

A big "HOORAY!!!!" for public education.

Just because it was a "False Flag Operation" does not mean no bombs were dropped. It was legitimate attack that we were aware of well before it happened. J

Here are some words of wisdom: Don't believe all conspiracy theorists, but have confidence in investigative reporters such as Jim Marrs and George Knapp.

Originally posted by TheHunted
Just because it was a "False Flag Operation" does not mean no bombs were dropped. It was legitimate attack that we were aware of well before it happened. J

Here are some words of wisdom: Don't believe all conspiracy theorists, but have confidence in investigative reporters such as Jim Marrs and George Knapp.

ahem

there is a MASSIVE difference between thinking an attack might occur SOMEWHERE and allowing the japs to bomb pearl harbour to drag you into a war. Or are you seriously suggesting the US Govt allowed a big chunk of its navy to be destroyed as a false flag?

Pllllleeeeeezzzze

If they wanted to false flag they could have torpedoed one of their old boats with no one on board and that would have been that. Allowing the hardware that they lost to be destroyed on purpose is just plain stupid.

And i would twist your words if i may, just because there are some conspiracys, it doesnt mean tht everything is a conspiracy.

I dont even know why i bother with these threads

Originally posted by groingrinder
You can watch newsreel footage of the planes dropping the bombs. You can watch the bombs fall and explode on the ships and planes. Are you blind? Is that it? You cannot see?

Could be fake news footage.

Originally posted by expatwhite

Originally posted by TheHunted
Just because it was a "False Flag Operation" does not mean no bombs were dropped. It was legitimate attack that we were aware of well before it happened. J

Here are some words of wisdom: Don't believe all conspiracy theorists, but have confidence in investigative reporters such as Jim Marrs and George Knapp.

ahem

there is a MASSIVE difference between thinking an attack might occur SOMEWHERE and allowing the japs to bomb pearl harbour to drag you into a war. Or are you seriously suggesting the US Govt allowed a big chunk of its navy to be destroyed as a false flag?

Pllllleeeeeezzzze

If they wanted to false flag they could have torpedoed one of their old boats with no one on board and that would have been that. Allowing the hardware that they lost to be destroyed on purpose is just plain stupid.

And i would twist your words if i may, just because there are some conspiracys, it doesnt mean tht everything is a conspiracy.

I dont even know why i bother with these threads

The British cracked a Japanese code weeks before the attack. They relayed the message to the U.S and nothing was done. What does that tell you? I don't know why you bother with these threads either.

The British cracked a Japanese code weeks before the attack. They relayed the message to the U.S and nothing was done. What does that tell you? I don't know why you bother with these threads either.

ermm, it tells me they cracked the code that made NO, i will say it again NO specific mention of an attack on pearl harbour They had only minimal staff (2 i believe) working on thousands of transmissions that mainly concerned the land attack on china. American MI was piss poor at the time and thats a fact

I dont bother with these threads because of half arsed assumptions and the twisting of facts to try and fit in with the given conspiracy theory. Im off, so dont bother attempting another witty response, you just let yourself down. If you really honestly believe that the US would stand to lose all that naval firepower BEFORE getting into a war then i dont know what else to say to you other than loosen the foil hat, its too tight



..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link


[edit on 8-9-2008 by 12m8keall2c]

According to Obama, there was only ONE BOMB.

Your "ahem" and "erm" are clear attempts to gain some attention. American MI? The Americans did not crack nothing, the British did. You say I twist my facts? You don't even know yours!

Just as no nukes were used in Hiroshima.

Originally posted by SparkOfLife
Could be fake news footage.

Damn....maybe ol' gramps was in on it too...!!! Maybe he even sacrificed his own frikkin' arm just for the lie.....

This website used to have some serious intellect contributing to it......

Does anyone know where that went????

Anyone???

Originally posted by TheHunted





Your "ahem" and "erm" are clear attempts to gain some attention. American MI? The Americans did not crack nothing, the British did. You say I twist my facts? You don't even know yours!

Why would i want your atention? Silly childish boy

Where in my post does it say the US cracked the code? I KNOW the british cracked the code. The Brits passed on the details to the US as did the Dutch. You were so desperate to try and get a sly dig in at me that you hadn't even read my post properly. I would concentrate more on the subject matter at hand my friend rather than trying to wind me up.

now shoo

Ladies calm down theirs enough of me to go around jeez.....Even if the Japanese didn't use bombs what difference is it going to make? Why would we destroy most of our navy save for the silent service (subs) and a few other ships? And please don't link this to 9-11 beaucuse that is just retarded

reply to post by SparkOfLife


Oh really? So the Japanese and the Americans just made the entire thing up, and the Japanese just recreated all of the after affects of a nuclear bombing... why exactly?

[edit on 8-9-2008 by RuneSpider]

Rune,
They used the same special effects group that filmed the Lunar landing on a sound stage!! Didn't you know that???? Geees how ignorant of us!!!!

Zindo