It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
One of the most fascinating things in this election is the recent sequence of events with McCain's VP nomination. It has been such a comedy of errors and strange unconnected events, including the person nominated, that we are now seriously considering such conspiracies. That in itself is extraordinary.
There has been no comedy of errors, unless you are calling the fact that Governor Palin is a human being with human limitations just like every other man and woman on earth a comedy of errors.
No, no, no. The comedy of errors is the Obama campaign trying to smear Palin because her daughter is pregnant. That after they launched an unsuccessful smear campaign based upon maliciously manufactured lies that her son was in fact her grandson.
The comedy of errors is the fact that members have said that Sarah Palin's children are a disadvantage to her when it comes to holding office.
The only people "seriously considering conspiracies" over these family attacks are salacious, conniving types. People who would use a 17 year old girl's pregnancy as political fodder. Well, not everyone considers pregnancy a "mistake", as BO does.
Originally posted by Multiple Junkie
If you can prove that the Obama campaign is trying to smear Palin we would all love to see it. If anything the comedy of errors is the McCain campaign scrambling to cover the tracks of Sarah Palin after announcing her as the VP nominee.
There has been no comedy of errors ...
What??? Seems to me Obama has repeatedly said t o leave family and children out of this. I beleive he's repeated this over and over!!!!!
Originally posted by jsobecky
No, no, no. The comedy of errors is the Obama campaign trying to smear Palin because her daughter is pregnant.
Originally posted by jamie83
McCain/Palin = real change you can count on!
Obama/Biden = same old Washington politics.
Yes, America is hungry for change. Ironically, it's McCain and Palin, two leaders who are the first willing to go against their own party, who will give America the change it wants.
GOOD lord JAMIE83...
DO you even no how moronic it sounds
liberal
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
conservative
1. disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
However I have no doubt riding the lefty bus will help GODDESSARAH AND MCSAME.
Originally posted by mister.old.school
The assumption is that Palin is now "in" on the strategy at some level, but was not when first selected.
The only name that continually surfaces in regard to the possible first choice is Condoleezza Rice.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread387427/pg3#pid4912059]
Originally posted by Multiple Junkie
If you can prove that the Obama campaign is trying to smear Palin we would all love to see it. If anything the comedy of errors is the McCain campaign scrambling to cover the tracks of Sarah Palin after announcing her as the VP nominee.
Sure, just a minute. Let me get that url of Our-Strategy-To-Smear-Palin.Com.
Show me where the McCain campaign is scrambling to cover Palin's tracks. Hasn't happened, not necessary. The Obama campaign is busy shooting themselves in the head by attacking a pregnant 17 year old.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If he has to dump her because he made a rash decision, then it's clear he makes bad judgments. Not a good trait for a president...
Ms Palin is now being spoken of as a disastrous choice that reflects badly on Mr McCain’s judgment
...
Mr McCain is rumoured strongly to have wanted Mr Lieberman as his running-mate before being forced to look elsewhere in the face of entrenched opposition from conservatives. His choice of Mrs Palin was unexpected and, despite insisting yesterday that “the vetting process was completely thorough”, it has become increasingly apparent that his campaign had time for only a cursory examination of her credentials.
...
At cocktail parties around the twin cities of Minneapolis-St Paul this week, Republicans made whispered references to Harriet Miers, who was nominated for the Supreme Court before being dropped unceremoniously by Mr Bush amid widespread ridicule of her expertise.