It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GodshipForAll
ahhh so the calm before the Solar Storm....
I think Earths planetary boat is gonna be rocked soon...
[edit on 1-9-2008 by GodshipForAll]
Problem is, ozone depletion from CFC's has nothing to do with the man-made global warming hoax, other than being a piece of unrelated evidence that is held up to the uneducated to make them think there is real science behind it. CFC interaction with ozone is a repeatable, scientific interaction.
You're wrong. The SUN is the energy that causes "warming", not Earthly gasses. That is precisely why ALL planets in our solar system are experiencing warming = increased Sun activity.
Originally posted by -Klaus-
If there were no green house gases in the atmosphere the Earth would be a big lump of ice, with too many green house gases the Earth would resemble Venus (with a surface temperature of 450°C).
It is the green house gases that cause excessive warming to occur and it is excessive warming of Earth that represents the concept of global warming, therefore I put to you that it is green house gases that cause global warming rather than the sun.
But you could see it as a chicken or the egg argument, without one you don't have the other. Without the gas sunlight is not trapped and so the Earth loses thermal enegy at a faster rate than it is gained, without sunlight energy cannot be gained at all, without out one or the other there is no global warming.
Originally posted by -Klaus-
Can you give me a link showing me the evidence that all other planets are warming?
I stated in my post that is the energy of the sun that enables the process of global warming to occur so I do not disagree with that, but without green house gases the earth would be a big ball of ice no doubt about it. The green house gases trap infrared radiation within the earth allowing energy to accumulate within the climate increasing global temperatures, without green house gases infrared radiation would not be trapped and heat would radiate away from the Earth cooling it.
In what is largely a reversal of an August announcement, astronomers today said Pluto is undergoing global warming in its thin atmosphere even as it moves farther from the Sun on its long, odd-shaped orbit.
Pluto's atmospheric pressure has tripled over the past 14 years, indicating a stark temperature rise, the researchers said. The change is likely a seasonal event, much as seasons on Earth change as the hemispheres alter their inclination to the Sun during the planet's annual orbit.
Originally posted by billyjoinedat2k8
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Sun Makes History: First Spotless Month in a Century
www.dailytech.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
In the past 1000 years, three previous such events -- the Dalton, Maunder, and Spörer Minimums, have all led to rapid cooling. On was large enough to be called a "mini ice age".
A century is 100 years not a thousand
[edit on 4/20/2008 by billyjoinedat2k8]
Originally posted by -Klaus-
Can you give me a link showing me the evidence that all other planets are warming?
I stated in my post that is the energy of the sun that enables the process of global warming to occur so I do not disagree with that, but without green house gases the earth would be a big ball of ice no doubt about it. The green house gases trap infrared radiation within the earth allowing energy to accumulate within the climate increasing global temperatures, without green house gases infrared radiation would not be trapped and heat would radiate away from the Earth cooling it.
Originally posted by -Klaus-
If there were no green house gases in the atmosphere the Earth would be a big lump of ice, with too many green house gases the Earth would resemble Venus (with a surface temperature of 450°C).
Originally posted by Maxmars
Could it be that the 'rise' in global temperature that some have been screaming their fool heads off about for the last couple of years might just be a naturally occurring cyclical temperature compensation that is part of the ecosystem's feedback to a recurring solar event?