It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Uniceft17
So, of course we have all heard McCain use the experience argument against Obama. My question is why the hell did he pick a VP wisth equal/less experience than Obama when he's 72-73 years old and has had cancer more than once, so what is the deal? So now that she is only a heartbeat away from being POTUS can that argument still be viable?
Originally posted by Uniceft17
So, of course we have all heard McCain use the experience argument against Obama. My question is why the hell did he pick a VP wisth equal/less experience than Obama when he's 72-73 years old and has had cancer more than once, so what is the deal? So now that she is only a heartbeat away from being POTUS can that argument still be viable?
Originally posted by Uniceft17
So, of course we have all heard McCain use the experience argument against Obama. My question is why the hell did he pick a VP wisth equal/less experience than Obama when he's 72-73 years old and has had cancer more than once, so what is the deal? So now that she is only a heartbeat away from being POTUS can that argument still be viable?
Originally posted by Dronetek
Why did you guys argue that experience is no big deal, because its all about the change?
Everyone is hypocrites if you're honest with yourself. This is politics.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Originally posted by Uniceft17
So, of course we have all heard McCain use the experience argument against Obama. My question is why the hell did he pick a VP wisth equal/less experience than Obama when he's 72-73 years old and has had cancer more than once, so what is the deal? So now that she is only a heartbeat away from being POTUS can that argument still be viable?
Why did you guys argue that experience is no big deal, because its all about the change?
Everyone is hypocrites if you're honest with yourself. This is politics.
Originally posted by Uniceft17
Originally posted by Dronetek
Why did you guys argue that experience is no big deal, because its all about the change?
Everyone is hypocrites if you're honest with yourself. This is politics.
I never made that argument. I'm just saying that McCain's main argument against Obama is that he isn't experienced enough to be President, and then he does this. Yes everyone is hypocrites, but this one came way out of left field, i'm still in shock. This would be like Obama puting Clinton on the Democratic ticket. It just doesn't make since to me.
Originally posted by Dronetek
She isn't going to be president, Obama is! On top of that, she has a lot more experience that Obama does! Again, the media has been pushing this idea that experience doesn't matter, up until his point. From my perspective, its you guys and your media that the hypocrite.
Originally posted by vor78
The difference is that Obama is running for president. Sarah Palin is not.
The Dems are taking the bait on this one, hook, line and sinker. With this selection, McCain is planting the idea that someone of Palin's (and Obama's) experience level is well suited to the Vice Presidential role but perhaps not President.
The Republicans are counting on the average voter to see this connection and, if they do indeed make that connection, the Dems attacks on Palin will reflect back on themselves. Afterall, if you're going to attack a VP Palin for having only two years in as a governor, what does that say of your own candidate who had 2 years in the senate when he announced his presidential run and only 3.5 now?
Originally posted by marg6043
She is completely lacking the confidence of a savvy politician like Biden.
I still wonder what in the heck McCain was thinking about.
Sarah Palin’s enemies are automatically added to the Endangered Species List
...
Jesus has a bracelet that says, “WWSPD?”
...
Sarah Palin once won a competitive eating contest by devouring three live caribou.
Originally posted by Dronetek
She isn't going to be president, Obama is!
Originally posted by marg6043
DG we are living very strange days, I am still trying to figure out why McCain choose that woman from Alaska, taking into consideration that is many other women in congress with political experience and savvy enough to take the role.
I guess McCain is getting senile and having a young women that can be his daughter will make him feel young again.
Because I can not imagine what she could be good for beside a trophy type of VP for McCain.
Originally posted by jamie83
I can't imagine the amount of pure sexism that goes on here, and how it's just accepted like there's nothing wrong with it.
Gov. Palin is a person first, and yet every reference to her is only about her being a woman.
Can you imagine if this is how people referred to Obama, except in terms of race?
"I can't imagine why the Dems picked that BLACK from the South Side of Chicago o be the candidate, unless of course it's just so they can have a token BLACK on the ticket."
"I guess having a BLACK on the ticket will make the Dems feel less white guilt."
"I guess the Dems need somebody in the White House to clean the toilets and shine Biden's shoes."
See how utterly disgusting your posts come across yet?