Wow! Close Footage of a UFO?

Originally posted by Kenan
You guys serious? This is clearly a CGI.

1) it's not blurred
2) the camera guy doesn't have an arthritis
3) it's not blurred

Gotta add... its NOT blurred... therefore it cannot be real

The drive 'field' causes the blur by day glow by night



Nope didn't read the rest of the thread this time

Originally posted by dracodie
Here are some examples showing how easy it is to fake a ufo video:

Why fake them? Just build one of these... paint it up and your all set

jlnlabs.online.fr...







[edit on 30-8-2008 by zorgon]

Gotta add -
The voices/language?
Bad acting through and through...Or they were doin some gob amounts of valium.

I speak the language, I live the culture...

Someone here see's a UFO?
They're gonna scream.
99.9% of the people involved would have been screaming from the get go.
Hell, I I let off a lantern the other night for a birthday party - it floated up very high before drifting over the Lido, (Lido being an outside piano bar here on the ocean).
I was shocked how people began screaming at the *light in the sky*.
Really flippin over it.
I heard so many “Madonnas’!” my ears were burning.

Considering screaming is a part of the national tradition (no insult implied or meant) - when he says "Go get your Grandmother." then "Run" "Run" - He'd a been screaming at her, and she's a started screaming for "Nona" before she took a step from the room where the "Filming" was going on.
And not one religious expletive?
Nawwww.
At one point he says *Cazo* - but no religious expletive?
Nawwwww...

Now, if these two are American Italians then - Oh well, there goes my post.

All in all, just listening to the audio - sorry to say - Fake.

Unfortunatelt, this UFO looks extremely similar to the ones supposedly operated by the Pleidans, which were photographed in the mid 70's by a Swedish guy (can't remember his name), who claims to have had contact with them.

I believe it was proven that those were fakes (though I could be wrong).

reply to post by MaynardisGod


Forgive me if i've misinterpreted your paragraph on perspective. You state that the object never changes perspective, however, from the video we view a limited portion of the side and in the latter frames we can only see the underside of the object.

As a comparison I submit a image posted by a previous poster



Pause the video at the 30 second mark and this shows the change of perspective much better than the picture above. (not youtube video)

Again forgive me if i've misinterpreted you. IF so please clarify.

ROFL....oh please..

www.youtube.com...

Anyone see a similarity?

Oh come on, the guy who made this is pissing himself laughing about how he's manipulated people to invest their time in debunking this #. Move along people.

Oh come on, the guy who made this is pissing himself laughing about how he's manipulated people to invest their time in debunking this #. Move along people.

Nice find, thanks. I still scream CGI though.

And why not invest some time in debunking this one? Its a well made hoax and I assume the hoaxer invested a fair amount of time in developing his CGI skills. I think it deserves a bit of discussion.
May he pi** himself loughing, who cares?

Originally posted by Hardee
Oh come on, the guy who made this is pissing himself laughing about how he's manipulated people to invest their time in debunking this #. Move along people.

Inspiring post... so we should not look at a piece of possible evidence and try to find possible explanations? People should try debunk the footage and raise questions. The people who have posted logical reasoned arguments on either side of the subject should be commended.

Ignorant remarks like yours, and attacks on people posting there opinions on a subject are terrible.

Thanks for your contribution

I give that Video 6 out of 10,

points reduced for its short lenth and background information(or lack of)

Its does however amaze me how many of our ATS members are CGI artists. it really does.


none of you can honestly tell that this was made using CG
not even 60%

nobody knows.
and if you took it to ILM stidios they probly wouldent be able to give you a 100% answer.

its a nice convincing video, I beleive it to be a solid object otherworldy or man made, its still good stuff.

I'd say ET origon only based on that I have seen ET craft and can only say for myself that they are here, and don't need the inclusion of the question "are they visiting us?"
and the fact that I see no apparent evidence in the video that tells me its a hoax.

Very interesting footage. It is unlikely to be CGI as the background and the image seem to match up when the camera wobbles. Apparently it is very hard to render realistic CGI on a shaky background caused by a handheld camera zooming in a long way.

On the other hand it just seems too good to be true but that is a very nagative stance to take and not a reason in itself to deny its integrity. So I'm going to lay my chips on it being genuine...for now.

:-)

reply to post by Truther


I agree with everyone when they say its great footage but thats just it its to great if it was real im sure the guy would try to sell the footage and if it was real we wouldnt have to see it on ATS a year later but it is great footage.

Congratulations on posting yet another hoax in this forum. Unless of course you watched the video and believe it is real. (Please tell me none of you did.)



[edit on 30-8-2008 by rocksarerocks]

Wow...Alvin, Texas is 10 miles from where I live...maybe I should start paying closer attention to the skies around me!

This is decent footage from what I've seen.

Originally posted by bloodsearch
reply to post by MaynardisGod

 

When I first saw the video in this thread, I was immediately reminded of watching a series of videos on youtube entitled 'AntiGravity explained and produced!!Amazing', 8 quick segments. In the last segment, he describes and shows pictures of crafts which look almost identical to these. Mostly the 'wavy' pattern of the 'hull' of the ship, resembling a ripple from a drop of water.

The pictures of the ship he's speaking of are around 3:44 in this vid



The rest of the vids are pretty interesting stuff, wasn't sure if it was posted here, already (I really assume it was, however, I'm only reposting for reference to the video the OP posted). Been a while since I've watched this series of video's, as well. Might have to watch it again in full to see if there are any more similar references (in my opinion) to the OP's video.

J

**edit to add*

Thread Starred and Flagged!! Great find, OP!

[edit on 30-8-2008 by jephers0n]

Inner circle has the landing gear.

One instance has the cover lit up with electrostatic illumination.
Not discharge, just glowing ether that's in the air.
See all of Tesla's glowing experiments before 1900 and please
don't have the CIA confiscate them now that I told you about them.

Don't bother to keep it a secret and read them yourself.

The next circular area is a covering for a spiral coil suspended below
an aluminum floor. This will charge up the ether.

Side voltage projectors are around the rim and one is central for
gravity.

Getting top and side vectored improperly might cause tipping
until the side vector is now against gravity.

It most like does not effect the pilot. His world is determined by the
Cosmos of charges he set up and we are the weird attitude.



ED: Voltage is tied to momentum (mv). Kinetic Energy is more like
mv^2, some how you have you have the old free energy in your
control with voltage developed charges and a voltage direction
vector.




[edit on 8/30/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

This is a Russian Defense Agency (read MAN MADE) flying object.
If you think there tech. is good, you should see ours. Much faster,
more stable, and our flying objects have a wider range in size.
Bigger is better, yet smaller is good too. Ours have considerably more advanced tech. on board, and have capabilities of unusual distinction.
From,
Proud to be an American.
God Bless the USA!

Sorry, I give it a

Originally posted by Waitingsolong
Sorry, I give it a

Not very constructive to the conversation, now, are we? What reasons do you have?