I live very near Milton Keynes and I support the E.T. hypothesis, a quick search reveals several events in the past few weeks.
Event number one 25th august 2008 ~2am:
www.miltonkeynes.co.uk...
Fairly credible witness claims that he has seen a saucer, unfortunately this image is very poor quality, one of the worst ive seen.
I presumed that the pale column behind the UFO is part of a building, on closer inspection the column is not part of the building below.
The 'building' is a concrete overpass on the road which goes from Deans hanger to Old Stratford.
Which means the trail is allegedly some kind of emmision or ionization caused by the craft, this fits with his description.
Examination of the phones memory would potentially give further evidence as to the validity of the image.
The 'astronomy expert' makes baseless claims akin to the famous swamp gas theory, if this picture is real how can it possibly be a meteor, the
object is CLEARLY less then 100m away as the witness states and appears to be in front of the trees next to the overpass.
It does not look like any lightning i have ever seen, and any reflection can be reproduced under the same conditions, plus the reflection theory does
not fit with the witnesses story.
This guy is using 'priori' scientific method, he assumes something first ( there are no such thing as unknown structured craft ) then makes
proclamations to support his bias, providing no evidence.
What i find interesting is that the astronomer makes these statements, this indicates to me that he believes this picture is genuine.
From a little looking around ive found that the date of this was last monday the 25th, this was 2.5 hours after the sightings of event 2. ( see below
)
My conclusions :
No natural process has been suggested which would account for this image,
this picture is either of a manufactured object or it is a fake.
Event number two : 24 th august 2008, ~11pm
www.mk-news.co.uk...
Note that one observer only sees one red light, one says high speed, and another says the lights are bright.
It is possible the high speed could be due to lanterns in the wind at low altitude. Nothing here indicates that the objects were changing direction
or color.
So there not much to go on here, I have found a few videos of the event :
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
User comments on the second video say that the lights were lanterns released by them.
So in this event its safe to assume unless further evidence is shown, that it was indeed lanterns.
How does this relate to event 1 ?, If this was lanterns and the witness was aware, this may have provoked him to create a hoax.
It seems for now, highly unlikely that the object in event 1 is related to the orange lights in event 2, the object itself is not orange either.
We should not dismiss these events until they have been analyzed to the full extent of our resources.
Ash