Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
here is one that looks remarkably similar to Lear's "Bucket Wheel Excavater":




from

ser.sese.asu.edu...

Good find BFT! Here it is again with noise reduction and B/C filter:

And how about this tower on the edge of the crater in the foreground photographed by Apollo 16?


Apollo Orbital Image AS16/H/AS16-118-18957.
Courtesy: Keith Laney


Don't see it? Ok, here's the zoom...



If that isn't a tower, then I'm Santa!!

Originally posted by mikesingh
If that isn't a tower, then I'm Santa!!

Nice find! Sorry to keep being a pest with the same question, but what is the scale of that photo? Is that "tower" 60 feet tall, or 1 mile tall?

That photo of the moon you post above looks surprisingly similiar to the moon in those earlier photos you posted showing those men taking those studio pictures of the fake moon in the little fake orbiter (about 10-15 pages back).

So it wouldn't surprise me if the photo above is a fake from that exercise, and "the tower" you show above is just a mark in the lens or negative or something (ala Armap style). Not saying it is, just a possibility.

[edit on 8-23-2008 by IronDogg]

reply to post by IronDogg


Height? Darn! I'll have to figure that out! Gimme some time or perhaps zorgon can do the dirty work for me!!

Here are a couple of mind blowing vids of Unidentified Lunar Objects. Thanks to zorgon’s The Living Moon web site that I was able to home on to Lunomaly.com where these pics have been posted.



More details can be got from Pegasus Research Consortium







All images above: Courtesy Lunomaly Research
Group

And here’s the other…



This one being from John Lenard Walson, I have my doubts as to its authenticity. He doesn’t mention where this strange structure is!

Any idea? Where’s zorgon, ArMaP and the other spooks when you want them?

Originally posted by mikesingh
To repeat, how can something materialize from nothing? Probably only Houdini the magician would have been capable of doing that!!

The bigger problem here is not the resizing, it's the type of file used.

There is no need of magicians when you turn a TIFF into a JPEG and do the enhancements with that instead of making them with the TIFF.

Try to do the same enhancements with the TIFF image and see for yourself.

Another thing that makes a difference is if you use the original TIFF and save the enhancements in JPEG or if you make the enhancements in a JPEG image, starting with a JPEG it's the worst you can do.

Zorgon learnt it long ago, that is why he uses PNGs instead of JPEGs, they do not create those rectangles that we can see in your enhanced image.

The resize algorithm doesn't manufacture artefacts, just smoothens them out. I've even given an example of this on that thread.

It depends on the algorithm used, if you use interpolation you can not control what the algorithm will create.

But that does not affect much the image, unless it's a resize with a large value, like 500% or more.

Originally posted by mikesingh
If that isn't a tower, then I'm Santa!!

I want a laptop, a new PocketPC and a new leather jacket, Santa.

It does not look like an object, there isn't any shadow cast by it, so I suppose it was a problem with the copy or with the digitising.

Originally posted by IronDogg
Nice find! Sorry to keep being a pest with the same question, but what is the scale of that photo? Is that "tower" 60 feet tall, or 1 mile tall?

The bigger crater closer to the camera is Kohlschütter. Kohlschütter has a diameter of 53 km, so the smaller crater, the one that has the "tower" on its rim, should be around 14 km, judging by a map of that area.

Comparing the "tower" with the crater gives me something like 600 metres high.

Originally posted by ArMaP
Comparing the "tower" with the crater gives me something like 600 metres high.

Ahh, perfect... Thank you very much for the perspective; so then it is about 60-65 meters in "diameter" at its base. Quite a "skyscraper" to be out in the middle of nowhere like that and to not have any shadow... As much as I would like to speculate on what that tower could be, I think it is not actually a structure on the moon but a glitch in the photo process somewhere along the line.

reply to post by zorgon


I just see two different scans of the same image, I cant see anything deliberatly hidden from the public by NASA, I only see scans wih different qualities. One would need more proof than that to claim that NASA/DoD/USGS are cencoring images.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by mikesingh
If that isn't a tower, then I'm Santa!!

I want a laptop, a new PocketPC and a new leather jacket, Santa.

Hmmm...I've just got one packet of peanuts and two of monkey nuts!! Make your choice!! And why in the name of Saturn's rings do you want a leather jacket? It's freaking hot in Portugal, for Chrissake!

merely controlled information, don't get too excited..

Originally posted by IronDogg

Originally posted by ArMaP
Comparing the "tower" with the crater gives me something like 600 metres high.

Quite a "skyscraper" to be out in the middle of nowhere like that and to not have any shadow.

Ahh..This is where my dear friend ArMaP falters! To err is human, what?

This pic has been studied in great detail by Keith and others. Where the shadow is concerned, you would not be able to see it due to a distinct fold in the ground which may be hiding the shadow. But of course until one actually sees the shadow, one can’t pin it down as a tower! And neither can we conclusively say that it’s not one!!

Cheers!

reply to post by mikesingh


In the winter it's colder than now, although it doesn't go bellow 0º Celsius where I live.

About that "tower", as expected it does not appear in other copies of that image. Some may say (and probably will) that it was "censored" from the photo, and if that was the case then it was also "censored" in photo AS16-118-18958, because that photo shows the same area and does not show any "tower".

Keith Laney does not have that photo on his site, and that would be the best way of proving that it was something anomalous on the Moon.

Originally posted by mikesingh
Where the shadow is concerned, you would not be able to see it due to a distinct fold in the ground which may be hiding the shadow.

And the distinct fold in the ground has the right size to hide the shadow...

Possible, but not very assuring of the existence of the tower, and those who studied the image probably know it, if that is their only explanation.

Originally posted by antmax21
What about this picture? I'm not sure if it has been posted but it looks weird to me. Not an expert in photography nor anomalies on the moon. But anyway this one looks funky..

lo5-70-h2b

That's a fingerprint.

Looks like a structure to me. Sorry i'd give a long answer but stupid ATS doesn't know how to display character maps correctly so i typed something in wrong and got sent back here and my message got deleted lol.

I looked at all of them pictures and it sure looks like a lot of them have been built. Any way my theories

1. They are just, in fact, rock formations
2. There really IS a man in the Moon and he, one day, decided to be creative with his terraforming.
3. The ET's built it either a long time ago or in more recent years.
4. We humans built it a long time ago in accordance with our possible secret history.
5. The government has been sending supplies up there all this time in secert and been building it.
6. Number 5 but with the help of the ET's
7. Justice League of America isn't fictional and it's the JLA Watch Tower (joke)

Any way the thing i marked in the picture jumped out at me when i very first saw it, in fact it jumped out at me more than the inverted 'D' did =-/

reply to post by azzllin


I don't remember the rover having been sent before there was anyone there to drive it. I thought that these pictures were taken from the Lunar Orbitor. Wasn't the Lunar Orbitor Mission years before the first astronauts or any rovers were place on the moon?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Spires on the Moon?

shadows, shadows of stones, long shadows of stones

come on seriously, spires?

Originally posted by mikesingh
Parallel Tacks!

Look! and in the top left part of the picture we have the head of a grey and a half eaten human head!
This is the proof that an invasion has happened before! be afraid, be very afraid.

scnr

[edit on 23-8-2008 by itsthatsow]

reply to post by itsthatsow


I can see what you mean actually. If you look closely at the image it seems that the "spires" are actually the side of the rock in shadow. That is unless my eyes are playing tricks on me.

Edited to show what I mean


[edit]
Admittedly a strange looking rock formation but nothing spectacular.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by bloodsearch]

spires?
how about regular ol' rocks with long shadows due to the position of the sun in reference to the moon? have you seen how long shadows get when the sun is setting on the earth? that doesnt make the river rocks out back 'spires'.