Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

reply to post by ArMaP


yes vcry interesting how much faked fotos there are on NASA´s servers.
www.geocities.com...

How Michael. J. Tuttle faked the Apollo Moon pictures.

This web page will reveal how Michael J Tuttle manipulated, (doctored), pictures from the so called Apollo training simulations, then posted them on NASA web sites as being genuine pictures taken on the Apollo Moon missions.







cheers


[edit on 21-8-2008 by anti72]

reply to post by mikesingh


here is another anomoly, looks like a power plant or something.

Originally posted by stinkhorn
reply to post by mikesingh

 

here is another anomoly, looks like a power plant or something.

oh Zorgon....you have been summoned sir...


[edit on 21-8-2008 by Fathom]

reply to post by chapter29


It was the liquid courage that gave you away. Shame, you're so eloquent when drunk.

reply to post by zorgon


I am more interested as to why there are no tire tracks behind the vehicles whilst there are dozens of foot prints in the earth going in each direction between camera and vehicle!!

(probably already answered as I have not read all the posts)!

Breifne

reply to post by stinkhorn


This image is on the Living Moon website. (Zorgon's kingdom!)



here:

www.thelivingmoon.com...

reply to post by mikesingh


That does not look like something on the Moon, it looks like something physically on the photo, but there is no way of really knowing, I am sure it's too small to be seen in other photos of that area, if they exist.

reply to post by anti72


Why are you flooding this thread with unrelated (and badly presented) material about Apollo missions?

And, in case you don't know about it, you should put all the text that you copy from other sites inside "external" tags (the small button with the "EX" in it when you write your posts), so it would not be confused by something written by an ATS member and brings problems about ownership of the text to ATS.

reply to post by thrashee


It happens from time to time...

But apparently my creative side comes out after a few shots and tokes; and thank goodness for spell check and dictionary.com at those times.

Originally posted by mikesingh
Edit to post another Moon Spire, this time from NASA's World Wind. Stay tuned!
.........






Cheers!

Very good! I will be back tonight to look through more pictures and hopefully I will be able to contribute something original and unseen. You certainly have a knack for it.

I took a day off today, so it is a slow morning. I was perusing one of the fake apollo sites and noticed that they echoed a previous posters questions about why they never saw buggy tracks on apollo images.

apolloscam.bravehost.com...

whoever wrote this site did horrible. you have to scroll left and right. Regardless, from about 3/4 of the way down the page, buggy tracks:










[edit on 21-8-2008 by bigfatfurrytexan]

[edit on 21-8-2008 by bigfatfurrytexan]

I am unsure what on the moon would make gullies. With no atmospheric pressure there should be no liquid water. What else could do it?

ser.sese.asu.edu...

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan






the last one is very interesting, indeed.

This is another interesting photograph supposedly taken by astronauts orbiting the Moon. See anything wrong with it?

Well in case you hadn't noticed take a look at the length of the shadows cast by the Moon mountains/peaks. The length of those shadows is colossal, many, many miles long.

Such a scenario is of course ridiculous. The reason the shadows are so long is because the light source is but a few feet away from the plaster paris model of the Moon.

[edit on 21-8-2008 by anti72]

Here are a couple more from the same image. This one looks like a river basin or something:




And this one was just some strange geology:

Originally posted by anti72
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan

 

the last one is very interesting, indeed.

This is another interesting photograph supposedly taken by astronauts orbiting the Moon. See anything wrong with it?

Well in case you hadn't noticed take a look at the length of the shadows cast by the Moon mountains/peaks. The length of those shadows is colossal, many, many miles long.

Such a scenario is of course ridiculous. The reason the shadows are so long is because the light source is but a few feet away from the plaster paris model of the Moon.

[edit on 21-8-2008 by anti72]

You got my attention. Now I have to go back to square one and figure out which photos are fake, which are genuine and which are genuine but doctored.

reply to post by anti72


Listen, i have no issue with thinking that many of the images were faked. I think, however, it was done so that SOMETHING would be released, as most of the actual photo's are classified. This is my opinion.

However, to support your plaster of paris theory above, i would like to see the plaster of paris model that created it.

I have seen just about all the evidence displayed. The whole buggy tracks question really, really annoys me. Even if on Earth, the buggy would still have to be driven to where ever it was photographed. It is silly to ask such questions when the photo with the buggy tracks is on the very web page that posed the question.

Originally posted by chapter29
reply to post by thrashee

 

It happens from time to time...

But apparently my creative side comes out after a few shots and tokes; and thank goodness for spell check and dictionary.com at those times.

It happens

To bigfatfurrytexan,

What do you actually need from that software that requires Linux? Meaning, do you just need processed results in a certain form? As in, something that could be performed on an alternate machine and then handed off to you for your viewer software?

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan


That whole area looks like old lava flows, and that is one of the reasons I think the tower is also a lava feature.

reply to post by thrashee


hmm....give me a while to ponder that. Ultimately i need my own Linux box, i think. I ran across some other software last night that actually "looks" at the images for you, and provides analysis. Not perfect, but a good shortcut. I need to see if the promised Windows release happened. If not...i guess i will start trying to build a new box (which i have no experience at, honestly).

Today i am swamped with satellite data.

Electron density.

reply to post by anti72


That talk about the length of the shadows shows the lack of thought behind it.

A shadow can be almost infinite (in theory it can really by of infinite length), that is why the Moon, so far away from us, can cast a shadow during an eclipse.