It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheHunted
Actually there is nothing wrong with my math. Not all vehicles have the same size fuel tank. The less fuel economy for the vehicle the larger the tank.
For example I have an 85 Olds Delta 88 that gets 20 mpg but also has a 25 gallon tank. My Lesabre has one that is 15 gallons.
So I'm sure your friends vehicle may have a pretty decent size fuel tank. Am I wrong?
why not just use ethonal when you can and keep the money here at home, than sending it over seas. look at brazil they don't import 1 drop of oil they run on ethanol they are truly energy independent. they exportt all of there oil. the food crisis becuase of energy demands is false, because there are endless things to make ethanol out of , and also the oil and gas companies spent over 1 billion $ to stop this from coming to market.
Originally posted by TheHunted
I'm not saying that sensible driving will solve the fuel crisis. I do believe that automobiles are number in consumption of oil. Drivers are pretty much giving away money to the oil tycoons. Why give them free money when we are the ones being ripped of.
Lets prove that our demand is not the reason for sky rocketing prices but is due to greed and power.
Originally posted by BlueTriangle
Originally posted by TheHunted
Actually there is nothing wrong with my math. Not all vehicles have the same size fuel tank. The less fuel economy for the vehicle the larger the tank.
For example I have an 85 Olds Delta 88 that gets 20 mpg but also has a 25 gallon tank. My Lesabre has one that is 15 gallons.
So I'm sure your friends vehicle may have a pretty decent size fuel tank. Am I wrong?
I was really trying to be a smart###, but you seem to have missed it anyways. You stated that for every mph over 65 you lose 1 mpg. This is a very simplistic way to look at it and it's not right. Using your method, a car that gets 20mpg will lose 1 mpg every mph over 65 so at 85mph it's now getting 0 miles per gallon.
I did some highway driving last night and paid attention to my tackometer. My car seems to coast at 2k rpms at around 72mph. Am I wrong in assuming rpms is what actually determines your mpg?
Originally posted by TheHunted
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
I'm calling this one a hoax or that you are from a different unvierse with different laws of physics. The higher the Revolutions Per Minute means how fast your engine is turning. The faster the turn then the more energy required. In this case the energy being used is fuel.
Then there is the resistance of air. The faster you move the more air resistance there is. No matter the size of your vehicle or engine you cannot escape that. The force of this restance slows your vehicle down, so to maintain speed your engine requires more energy. Once again the energy used is fuel.
[edit on 15-8-2008 by TheHunted]
Also, say you travel 30 miles at a constant 90 mph and then make another trip of 200 miles at a constant 90 mph. You will get noticably better mileage on the second trip, because you have a greater amount of distance to make up for the disporportionate amount of fuel used to accelerate to 90 mph.
Originally posted by Evil Genius
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
Also, say you travel 30 miles at a constant 90 mph and then make another trip of 200 miles at a constant 90 mph. You will get noticably better mileage on the second trip, because you have a greater amount of distance to make up for the disporportionate amount of fuel used to accelerate to 90 mph.
This makes absolutely no sense. In both cases, you must accelerate up to 90mph so where is the gain in mileage if both cars go the same speed?
Originally posted by TheHunted
reply to post by BRQuick
Your MPG is your overall fuel economy. It's not how many miles you will go on one full tank. So how does the math not work? Average of 12 mpg x 25 gallons = 300 miles. Where does my math go wrong?