posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 12:38 PM
www.fort.usgs.gov...
www.washingtonpost.com...
www.newscientist.com...
www.sciencedaily.com...
While I can't say anything for certain about the electrical field effects or low-frequency effects, what I can say with certainty is that the blades
create a low pressure zone in their vicinity. Low atmospheric pressure that explodes bats' lungs can also cause discomfort in humans, especially
those with arthritis or other joint diseaes, or those with respiratory problems. Combined with the potential of the two aforementioned problems, I say
go slowly.
So while I am for alternative energy, I think we need to better gauge the subtle effects before we set them up willy-nilly depending upon how
profitable the location seems. Nature doesn't waste much, so why should we assume that the wind energy we are intercepting isn't vital to something
downstream, so to speak? I'm not advocating
not using wind energy, but rather doing so slowly and making sure we aren't creating a problem
too big to rectify quickly.