White Americans to be minority by 2042

reply to post by Sonya610


That data is from 2001 and Canada doesn't belong to white people.
Native Indians were here first.

Nice try though.

reply to post by buds84



Yeah...I understand. We can't involve facts here. Its okay. I guess I owe it to your people. : )

Last response from me hon.

Originally posted by spitefulgod

White Americans to be minority by 2042

www.telegraph.co.uk

Higher birth rates among minority residents, especially Hispanics, is accelerating the demographic changes brought by immigration and will lead to an end of the US' white majority around 2042.

(visit the link for the full news article)

so this means the whites can finally get some well earned and paid for government aid?????/ whites can live off of welfare now w/ out being turned down... whites can now say "is it because im white".... lol yeah right itll never happen. the elitists wont allow it.

Originally posted by tjetbone
so this means the whites can finally get some well earned and paid for government aid?????/ whites can live off of welfare now w/ out being turned down... whites can now say "is it because im white".... lol yeah right itll never happen. the elitists wont allow it.

The elites don't have anything against white people. They ARE white people. But the elites do see the benefit in diversity, in keeping the masses (of any race) in their place, in causing conflict and focusing the average persons mind onto trivial things.

reply to post by Sonya610


I wasn't referring to performance in the class room. Classroom participation has little to do with intellect, but a lot to do with conforming to the will of others.

reply to post by hypervigilant


What? Please quote whenever possible. Is this about the school comment? If so, please explain any errors in detail and cite sources. This thread has had enough baseless comments that cannot be backed up.

People today believe colonialism is long dead, the truth is much different. Although its not nations invading, its cultures. It was wrong for Britain to go to Africa and makes parts of Africa into Britain. It was wrong for France,Spain and it was certainly wrong for Germany to expand its borders.
Why then, isn't it wrong for nations to be demographically and culturally destroyed.

This makes no sense to me, why do western countries have no sense of nationalism these days. Yes, one example here, The Nationalist Socialist Party, is often drawn against us 'nationalist'.But I question their nationalist sense. The fascists that went under the name of nationalists were NOT nationalist, they where Imperialist. A nationalist understands and respects others right to sovereign land more than any other. We care about protecting our borders, not expanding them.

Now if you went to China and told the Chinese that in fifty years, That the Han Chinese will be a minority and that actually, middle-eastern people will 'own' the land demographically. They'll laugh and say it'll never happen, it can't happen. China is China because of the Chinese people.

Same goes for Japan, India ...ect.Yes,we Brits shouldn't have brothered with the world... I'm not afraid to say we shouldn't have...because we shouldn't have. While India benefited from railroads, British men and boys where stuffed down mines to fuel this imperial drive (And while the Imperialist exploited a lot of people, this is just one example). Just as the poor of China are exploited due to the new age of Globalization.

The west needs to grab some balls and tell the liberals enough is enough. For this reason, I shall be voting for The British National Party in the future.

Don't get me wrong, every generation of my family for seven generations has seen someone fight for Britain (and in four of those seven cases, died for Britain). I would not see a facist or communist party come to power in Britain and destroy our freedom and liberty imposed by generations of Britons after the Magna Carta. The BNP arn't facist, and I wont waste time defending them from narrow minded people on this forum.

Where does this fit with America? Well, we've already seen one majority there reduce to a minority. Why let it happen again?

Originally posted by Vowles
The west needs to grab some balls and tell the liberals enough is enough. For this reason, I shall be voting for The British National Party in the future.

Great rant. But it is NOT about the "liberals" and if you think it is you are being mislead. I for one am all about animal rights and the environment.

Stop hating on the Liberals. In fact the Liberals are in many ways the best and the brightest white intellectuals, and instead of hating and alienating them, they need to be brought home. They have good intentions they are just fooled by spin.

Sorry, I agree it was a rather generic attachment, but it refers to the great people of things like UAF, who welcome the destruction of cultures and anything that really defines an individual.

I'm myself, very liberal at heart, maybe I should of said the extreme-far-left.

reply to post by enoughalready

I know the blacks today aren't oppressed and that your and my ancestors may have had nothing to do with their ancestors being slaves, but we are white and so shouldn't we be entitled to cater to them to make up for it? It kind of seems like we do. I don't want to beat them with my proverbial whip anymore and my being white seems to upset a lot of them and I just feel awful about that. I hate that my skin makes them remember the horrible things they have endured.

The Mongolians had the largest continuous empire ever,should their people of today make up for the people of the past?

The Romans ruled Europe,Britain and the Mediterranean for 100s of years,should the people who now live in Rome have to compensate for that?

The Spanish ruled large parts of north and south America and all of central America,should the people of today be made to suffer for the actions of the past?

24 African kingdoms paticipated in the Atlantic slave trade,are the people of today to blame for this?


Whats my point?
You can't expect the people of today to correct the mistakes and actions of the past.Its impossible and its unfair.


And maybe in all your sympathy for the black people of America,you should also think of the natives.After all,you are on their land,they have nowhere to go.Black Americans can go to the home of their ancestors if they so wish.(and no,i don't think that they should.)

Some white people are the enemy of today,but they are by no means the only race to rape countries and enslave people.


You are white,you shouldn't be ashamed of it.Just as black,asians etc should not be ashamed of their skin colours.By making skin colour an issue you cannot move forward,you cannot be united with other people because you use your own race as a barrier.

...I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood...I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character...

MLK.

If you want to make up for the past,then forget that different skin colours exist and see all people as one.

I am actually very upset to hear this article and if it is indeed true.

I am not a racist, but I do wish that each culture stayed in their own land, since the beginning of time that is, and were not like many of the cultures of today who try to move into and dominate the previous establishment.

When I was in middle school, there was about 5-10% black students, which is about 15 years ago. Now, I wouldn't sent any child there for fear of hate crimes being committed against him. These are black students who come from inner city Philadelphia into the suburbs because their black schools in the city are much too violent and overrun with gang culture. So instead, they bring this way of life into the predominately white schools until they are no longer predominately white where children are scared to go to class each day, and unable to learn. If this is considered multiculturalism and if it is indeed a good thing, I fail to see the benefits.

Now, dont get me wrong.. I love other cultures, especially asian women. Man, do I ever. But I would rather live in a world where each culture lives on land of their own, and did not have to worry about theri way of life being destroyed exactly like what is happening to the USA currently.

It also goes to show how whenever minorities move into a town, the housing prices drop. Graffiti starts popping up all around, and the white people try to move further into another white neighborhood until the minorities are on their doorstep again, so yet again they again move further away. My old neighborhood was once a great place to live. You could leave your doors open, stay out past dark, walk the streets with your friends... but now, you'd be crazy to do them things. And sad to say.. but mostly black people live there now. Most crimes are committed by black people in my old town, most robberies, stabbings, murders, and so on. All this in a place that not even more then 10 years ago was a middle class, white neighborhood where you would never hear of any crime.

Eventually us people of european descent, us white people, are not going to have anywhere left to go to. The whole country will be overrun by minorities - and while I wish it was a good thing - its not. Crime will be commonplace, gang life style will be normal, and society will be anarchy. I wish this doesnt happen.. I really do, but I do not see minorities trying to make a difference... Drive through a predominately black area of town and tell me thats what you want our country to look like in 2046?

I have never once seen minorities move into a town and make it better. Never. Why is this?

[edit on 16-8-2008 by deadline527]

Originally posted by deadline527

Now, dont get me wrong.. I love other cultures, especially asian women. Man, do I ever.
[edit on 16-8-2008 by deadline527]

And we are supposed to take you seriously

reply to post by buds84

How do you think people we living before vaccines? Just fine.

Not really.
Most of those who suffered from a disease died.
For example,Smallpox was a leading cause of death in the 18th century.It killed an estimated 340,000 Europeans each year.In the 17th century it killed 90% of the Massachusetts Bay Indians and in the 16th century it killed countless millions in central and south America.

reply to post by deadline527



In a weird way, the influx will save us. If the future means the other two majority ethnicites are hispanic and asian, they will have the balls to do what whites cannot.

You are right, "white flight". I moved from California to Georgia and I was a "stupid white woman" that didn't understand what it meant when there were a ton of for sale signs up in the neighborhood. I know what it means now.

However other people don't just pick up and sell their house and move quietly away again and again and again. Plus others do not always feel guilty breathing in the presence of black people and using up oxygen.

I live in an area where white flight is continual, and very sad. We can't keep running. If we lose the majority I do believe that the other major players will set things right. They have NO guilt, and they share none of our weaknesses or apologetic attitudes.

reply to post by Sonya610

PLEASE point out those important inventions from other races. We need to learn.

Have agreed with a lot of what you have said so far,but whites are not the only ones to have great inventions.

For example,the Chinese invented such things as paper,printing,the compass and the co-fusion steel process.

As i said in an earlier post,a lot of modern inventions are actually re-discoveries of that which has been lost or forgotten.

You know guys, "white" is all relative. In Europe you're not necessarily considered white, unless you're from Northern Europe, i.e Scandinavia, Germany, England and so forth. If you're from around the mediteranean you are not white. In America however i would say that most italians are considered white.....So what gives?

Originally posted by jakyll
For example,the Chinese invented such things as paper,printing,the compass and the co-fusion steel process.

I could only recall gun powder (well fireworks etc..). But I do not question your statement. Asian culture is quite advanced and they have contributed to modern technology in some ways.

However "paper" sounds like splitting hairs a bit. Papirus and all. Written language is a huge thing, and yes ancient Asian civilizations developed their own written language, but well...you see my point.

Originally posted by StefanO
You know guys, "white" is all relative. In Europe you're not necessarily considered white, unless you're from Northern Europe, i.e Scandinavia, Germany, England and so forth. If you're from around the mediteranean you are not white. In America however i would say that most italians are considered white.....So what gives?

Some of us addressed that a few pages back. Yes white typically refers to pale skinned European peoples...Caucasian defines race and is much broader. Many darker skinned Caucasians were light skinned Europeans way back when.

reply to post by deadline527

I am not a racist

Coulda fooled me!

Have you never heard that variety is the spice of life?

If people had never inter-mingled then the world would be a very different place than it is today.When cultures mix life generally progresses,when they don't mix they become stagnent and unchanging.


There's also a good chance you wouldn't be living in the US.You'd be in "white" Europe with white thieves and white murderers and white rapists....

Originally posted by Sonya610

Originally posted by StefanO
You know guys, "white" is all relative. In Europe you're not necessarily considered white, unless you're from Northern Europe, i.e Scandinavia, Germany, England and so forth. If you're from around the mediteranean you are not white. In America however i would say that most italians are considered white.....So what gives?

Some of us addressed that a few pages back. Yes white typically refers to pale skinned European peoples...Caucasian defines race and is much broader. Many darker skinned Caucasians were light skinned Europeans way back when.

I hear you......Well Im 100% Swedish, for hundreds of year back, as far as we've been able to trace our family tree....I guess that makes me VERY white.