Apparently...

Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had 3 children. A daughter name Tamar, a son named Jesus, then a second son named John, who was apparently the grail child.
The catholic church took all this information out of the bible because it was "irrelevant" and they were the only ones capable of actually reading the text.
Weird.

Please, if you are going to impart this "factoid" upon readers of this site, at least include a link to a place on the web where you read or heard this? Or if it isn't on the web then tell us who told you this or what book this came from? I don't care if your source is a bazooka joe comic, inquiring minds want to know that you didn't just pull this out of thin air.

Here's just a few, sorry about that bud





www.harpercollins.com.au/book/index.aspx?isbn=9780007200856 - 43k -


www.gebladerte.nl/30092v01.htm - 16k -


freethechurch.org/Truth/World/conspiracy.html - 11k -

(Just adding to the disinformation)

In all honesty I believe the Holy Grail, the cup used in The Last Supper is highly metaphorical in nature and doesn't exist other than what it is...a metaphore for the life and cruxcifiction of Jesus.

How's that for a de-bunk?

So then you could agree to see The Holy Grail as the second son of Jesus, maybe?

reply to post by el justeen o


But copies of gospels have been dated to pre-church times.


How does that jive with your theory?

That does not mean that information was not taken away...