posted on Aug, 11 2008 @ 06:33 AM
why aren't the millions of amateur astronomers around the world seeing Planet X. If it's going to get here by 2012, it should be visible to
some telescopes. (If it's a brown dwarf, does that mean it doesn't project much visible light?)
Planets do not emit light of their own, and yet some of them (Venus, Jupiter, Mars at opposition) are among the brightest objects in the night sky.
Why?
Because they reflect the light of the Sun.
It's true that brown dwarfs emit more energy in the infra red (heat) than they do visible light, but that is irrelevant. They still emit
some
visible wavelength radiation, and they are also much larger than planets. That means that they would have a greater surface area to reflect the light
of the Sun, and would therefore appear brighter than any of the planets at comparable distances.
In short, if a brown dwarf was due to pass through the inner solar system in December 2012, it would be visible to the naked eye
right now.
So where is it ?
If it was visible from the South Pole, most of the southern hemisphere would also be able to view it, at least through telescopes.
Quite true, so the "only visible from the south pole" theory holds about as much water as a cup made of oxygen.
There's no record of catastrophes occuring every 3600 years on Earth......
.....and no evidence of instability in the orbits of the planets and main belt asteroids.
Please, close the book on Nibiru/Planet X. You seem to be a sensible person, so don't be swayed by the uninformed rubbish on the subject that gets
posted here on a daily basis.
[edit on 11-8-2008 by Mogget]