Notice an actual cover up exposed 8/8/08

And it still stands that the court is corrupt.

The cowardly dont like it when their victim defends themself or their views. The cowardly are out to do harm with fabrications and misleading statments and all kinds of suggestions that are left open so nothing is told fully truthfully.

Since it is so that by now, give all the time thus far, that no super star served on a case in a jury, then this case is still opened.

Anyone else looking to fight need not respond to someone who is wisest amongst. I didnt say that without proof in this thread being the foolish ones in comparison by fact sown.

Any one feel mad at me? Dont cover it with back handed talk. Tell why and how you're mad at me even if it show you are a mean person. Be upfront or else you'll find you're pretending like a coward in life. Pretending that you're truely responding to thread topic is what cowards do. Is that you? If you wont tell me direct why and how in the hell you hate me, then keep shut and move without replying.

Word life! Should Life!

And not just me, if you hate anyone tell that person the reason. If you have no reason, then that only says you have an illness mentally. Hating ppl or being mad in life is a danger to yourself because you dont know what someone might do having to encounter with you in your hateful or mad state.

And real ppl do real things. You see the water running and ppl standing around it, talking about someone left it on, only a real person would think to turn it off out of all the busters standing around. Face it, certain ppl are damned by there own not-doings who have the attitute to go along with it.

If I may turn this thread on it's head. So many famous people serving jury duty...suspicious...

Only kidding!

In court Both plaintiff, and defendant can excuse any juror for any reason. the jury must be impartial. Technicality does not mean conspiracy. We want justice in our courts! Not a chance for a celebrity to show up and distract you from your right to an Impartial trial. Be logical, who cares about the celebrities? not the judicial system. focus on something like defending our rights against DHS. Not poking your nose into a celebrities business. RIGHT TO PRIVACY anyone?

Originally posted by Mabus

Originally posted by eaganthorn

Originally posted by Mabus
reply to post by eaganthorn

 

I know more than you since you put me out there as if I dont.

Plus, I knew you wouldnt back up what you previously said when it aint even going on with that "you're too special" etc stuff you put on here as if it were so so. You like to inject misleading statements for readers you think are not wise? Then if I question you you want to deem me as young and not in the know? Haha. I just knew you'd put me in the not know mix based on how only your post could be answered with questions.

Sometimes questions bring certain types to the surface.

These fabricating types unjustified exist for now. Dont let the anti-Christ bible say what's in store for them.

I dont get why ppl still taking shots at me as if they slick in how they word it.

Not once did I mention my age as anyone else wise can see.

[edit on 9-8-2008 by Mabus]

There is no need for you to post your age or retorts of any kind about your intellect. Your sentence structure, word choice, spelling, lack of understanding the fundamentals and basic principles of our legal system, all speak loud and clear enough for most of us to assess your status.
You have not been looking for an answer, you are looking to fight. You have realized that you have the power to challenge and then ignore and effectively shutting down opposition to your rants and this brings you some level of satisfaction. All of this puts you at an emotional age around puberty.
Good luck my young friend.

Only thing you've revealed is that you are delusional. You've assumed, have you not? Plus, you are the cowardly. How? You try to be slick with taking shots at me first! Why do it? O a coward wont answer that to their victim.

If you dont call taking a shot at me by deeming me young and not knowing jack, then you are ugh. And you live with that on the inside. Why would you even want to? Ugh! Must feel like crap all day. And dont get mad if someone treats you like you treat them with that delusional assuming that's actually revealing hatred of some kind.

Still emotional I see, still wanting to fight.
I've addressed my comments as an attempt to help you understand the court system as to why there aren't more celebrities serving as jurors. OP
You've refuted my explanation by saying you have no personal knowledge of the information and opinion I have offered. This by itself is an unstable point of argument to take and reflects a younger, more egocentric view of the world. Something you will learn in the first year of Psychology.
After reading more of your posts I began to see a pattern in your writing where you appear hostile toward those who offer an opinion or fact.
You appear to have taken my comment and apology about the assumption of your age as an insult and I assure you it was not intended as an insult. Your comments and emotional challenges do reflect that of a very young person, if not in age, in emotional development.
Please don’t think it is meant as an insult, you are what you are, as we all are.
I made the comment of you not looking for answers, you appear to want a fight and I stand by that claim. You have repeatedly demonstrated this desire and you have now gone so far to make a claim that a person, one you have never met, to be a coward. A thinly veiled attempt to not lose a companion, you want me to engage you. You do not want me to leave you. I could talk with you some more, if you wish but I do have some other things to attend.

reply to post by eaganthorn


The point is you've taken shots at me (the person) instead of just responding to what I put.

What do you think that says to me or anyone like me? Put yourself in your victims shoes. Yeah, it says enough that you are a hateful or mad person.

Like 2pac said "I wasnt mad until they shot me".

Thus the victim has every reason to seem madly defensive. But the offensive offender trying to justify themself in what they did with school education background says enough on your kind. It says you lack judgment if a class you took is your defense which got you acting the way you are toward me. Whose to say that a class taken serves every person who took it well in life? It surely isnt serving you well when I factor in your poorly acted upon judgment about me (the person), now does it?

Personal attacks started by you put you as the one looking to fight. And just because I defend back you want to say I'm looking to fight like it's a bad thing while forgetting you're the one looking to fight firstly with the personal attacks as if your crap doesn't stink? Such reveals a hypocritical side to you. No one likes a hypocrite no matter what schooling background they hold to. Either the school or your parents failed you if they let that kind of judgement you act on go unchecked and uncorrected. And you prolly wont learn from your ill actions if you believe your school background gives you the right of way to attack the person themself firstly.

I wouldnt buy that a school taught you to attack the person for every thing they do. Schooling serves well inside the field's places of business it pertains to, not outside it. Any wise person knows there is a place and time for certain things. Ppl who displace certain things away from their proper places are the wickedly doing iniquity in the world. No school tells a student-surgeon to operate on someone on the sidewalk, do they? So I know when someone is serving iniquity. And yes, I am wise to check you to put you in your place. If no one can put you in your proper place to where you have an understanding to not go out of place ever again, then that tells me you are wicked sown. Nothing can be done expect the extreme in certain cases.

So if you were unaware of understanding to keep that Psychology stuff in its proper place, now you're aware, and have no excuse. Any excuse only reveals an unrepentful kind. And what the hell do you think someone is supposed to do with the unrepentful kind? What do judges do to criminals who show no repentence? They put 'em in a hard deadly place called prison which serves as a hell. Just imagine if there is Hell...



[edit on 9-8-2008 by Mabus]

well, with everything you've said, you were still proven wrong.


I just love it when people can't take it and have to go off topic for pages, putting other member on ignore becuse they don't like being proven wrong.

The personal sniping ends now.

Discussion will center on the topic and not the poster.

The topic for discussion is, "Notice an actual cover up exposed 8/8/08".

Further off topic discussion could result in action.

Thank you.

Lol, this guy is ridiculous. I simply stated that he is being over the top and he put me on ignore.

It doesn't seem the path of the wise to ignore that which challenges you.

I'll say it. This guy is stupid.

reply to post by Mabus




I know I'm going to regret this... so "Armor on" as they say...


Mabus,


A) you are either too young mentally or physically to understand the vast differences in the real world and 'Hollywood'. Walking Tall is BASED on a true story... A story of a cop who didn't take crap. He's a local Legend. The town he was sheriff of is about an hour away from me. He'd even tell you, If he had done half the crap Dwayne Johnson did in that movie, before being an officer; he would have never been elected. What you are preaching is vigilantism which is illegal, and can get the wrong people killed or thrown in the clink.

B) eaganthorn gave you a PERFECT explanation of how the judicial system picks jurors for a trial. There are some flaws in this system, but that lies mainly on a common practice of Prosecution and Defense Attorneys being good buddies. If a crime was really committed sometimes the Defense Attorney will sell out their client, against their clients wishes. But then, theres the appeals process to fix this.

C) No citizen is exempt from jury duty. Whether your a deemed a suitable peer for the person/s on trial is a different story. Dependent on the case Jury pools range from 30-120 people. The worse the offense the larger the pool.
ALL of these people must report to court until the prosecution or defense finds reason to dismiss them from this particular cases jury. The judge really has no say in the matter unless they feel that something is afoot. One again, this is the reason for appellate courts. If you feel your trial was not just, it is presented before new judges, with a new Prosecuting attorney. If an appeal hearing is granted (which is NOT rare) the case is re-heard in a higher court.
This can go all the way to the supreme court.

D) I have a sneaking suspicion your a young adult who just got busted doing something you shouldn't have been doing... and you don't really want to face the music for your offense. Now, I'm presuming alot here, (but as you've done the same for every response you have received I feel it's justified) but I think you got tried, and got sentenced, and you don't think it's fair. I don't know what your deal is with Super-stars, or Actors, Pro-Athletes or whatever, but I advice a daily meditation session.

E) Turn off your computer. Walk outside. Find a nice quiet place, with flowers and fauna. Sit there and stare at a flower. When you don't feel like tearing it apart anymore, come back and tell us what the calm, happy you thinks about this topic.

Your Pal,

Coven


P.s. Lovely name choice... Are you the heir apparent to our proud leader/ S&B member? if not why are you using his name?

reply to post by Mabus


okay a few points.

1. If anyone actually believes that the courts are not corrupt, then i can probably convince that person that rain can fall up sometimes, gimme a friggin break.
2.The celebrity thing is REALLY stretching it, i bet u anything that they get summoned BUT no prosecuter OR defense attourney would EVER chose to keep them like someone else said, it would be a circus, now while one side might get an advantage from the circus atmosphere, BOTH sides must agree on the jurors. LOOK UP THE PROCESS BEFORE U POST and please use common sense.
3.Mcmurray may not be famous to u or the "typical" ATS user (if there is such a thing) but coming from the south i can tell u that right around 25% of people recognize his name and face, and that's being conservative, he is in MAJOR comercials that run everyday, so once again, u are confused.
4.All that aside, it was an interesting topic, but we could really do much better posts on the corruption of the judicial system. maybe i'll start a thread, because i worked in the system for 5 years and have seen how those gears grind.
-johnny come lately