It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by TrueLight
Some people are making money out of it. And I would guess that websites that suggest contrails are caused by secret govt spraying for nefarious purposes will get more hits than sites saying increasing amounts are contrails are due to increased air travel, so would people please stop flying.
Originally posted by TrueLight
I am wondering what this means? Is it possible, in your opinion, to make money from promoting information as regards the chemtrail issue? And if so, how? It would certainly put an angle on this subject that I hadn't considered until now.
Originally posted by neformore
99% of people have not got a clue about what is in the sky above them. To most folks its a "jet", and most people have no idea whatsoever that the aircraft they see can be flying at anything from two to five miles high above them, operating in a flight line, on an airport stack etc.
99% of people have not got a clue about advanced aspects of meteorology - and lets be clear on this that contrail formation is not a simple subject to cover.
Originally posted by TrueLight
99% of people knowing nothing about meteorology is a high percentage. Given that statistic I assume that it is mainly professionals, pilots and weather persons who are "in the know" so to speak.
You seem to know quite a bit about the subject, are you in the field or have personal experience yourself?
Originally posted by TrueLight
I am wondering, are there any independant sites debunking chemtrails?
Originally posted by neformore
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
So, the name calling stops now please.
I hope thats clear.
If your only retort to people who provide information to a thread is to call them a "shill" or "disinfo agent" then your whole credibility is blown. It means that you have nothing to offer.
So lets have a proper reasoned discussion, shall we?
Swing....as to point number one....HOW is a particulate 'added' to the exhaust? Good theory, if can be proven.
Point 2....how long do particulates stay in the upper atmosphere? Well, let's ask a few volcano experts here. I've seen science shows, NG or the Science Channel, that discussed some volcanic eruptions of note, and how the particulates STAYED in the upper atmosphere, carried by the winds, the jetstreams, to places thousands and thousands of miles from the point of eruption. So, having seen these programs doesn't make ME an expert, but it does reinforce my understanding of science, and meteorology.
Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by Erasurehead
Out of interest, would you be as keen to watch a documentary produced by a meteorological organisation showing how and why contrails form, how they are becoming more and more common and the possible consequence for climate of such contrails?
Anyone else ever wonder if the chemtrail hoax was started and/or perpetuated by people who want to divert attention away from the real potentially serious consequences of increased air travel. After all, if we believe it's just the military or government we won't cut back on our own flying?
The obvious conspiracy is not always the real one
Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by Matrix1111
Why do chemtrail believers post here? You've already made up you minds and have no intention of changing them. You certainly show no intention of engaging in intelligent debate (such as offering supportive evidence or giving due consideration to evidence that refutes your assertions)
Shouldn't you all be posting on somewhere like Chemtrail Central?
Who's paying you to spread the hoax? Or it is more like a religious crusade.
Still, I know how Gallileo felt ....
Yet still the contrails move
Edit: I was going to call you contrail debunkers - but I guess that would be inaccurate because you've not actually made any attempt to debunk the assertion that what you're seeing is contrails
[edit on 7-8-2008 by Essan]
reply to post by weedwhacker
Swingster, YOU must be joking. Or, amybe I got it wrongly.
I don't remember another thread that discussed this....If I posted there, then I may have skipped over anything that I saw as ludicrous...my bad.
So, please help me....