Moon Landing Photo

Im sorry and i know i should'nt expect to, but i have never seen a photo that looks anything like the moon i see every night!!
It jus has a glow that i've never seen in any photo!!! and i kno there's obvious reasons for the glow, but i'm sorry i dont buy them!!!

reply to post by RuneSpider



and any one of those moon missions would have been a lousy time to say...point the camera straight up and snap the stars alone i bet. thank god they didnt waste any film on that, now we hall all these rocks to look at.

Could someone take a night picture of Los Angeles from the desert (isn't that where it's guessed that a fake landing could be done - near Edwards AFB?) and see if it looks anything like this after it's "blacked out". I don't live near LA, but if anyone does, or near any other desert, we could see if we can get similar results.

Or do this to any of the other horizon photos from the moon and post it? To see if we get similar skylines?

I see the photo shop argument - but honestly, I think the squares that show up in the black in the lower image look much more like "artifacts" than buildings. But the one's on the horizon have a 3D quality to them and a uniformity that looks suspiciously skyline. I actually think I see a difference between the two black areas. And of course there is that the whole lower image is full of squares and the horizon stops just at building level. Any of you, think that too?

reply to post by ArMaP


ok .. so, explain this pic PLZ..liftoff

ok ... I'm don't know about everyone else, but, doesn't this pic strike you as being a little 'odd' .. just look at the

picture and think about it for a minute.

Look at the earth, then look how the horizon of the moon and the distance they are from the surface..

Do you see it?

reply to post by Komodo


You wont get an answer there - truth is often left to "summation". It is so sad that so many see but refuse to part of the truth ** still for me

No one ever answers my questions or rebukes....

[edit on 8/9/08 by rezial666]

reply to post by Komodo


Sorry, I don't understand what you mean, could you please try to explain it more precisely?

Thanks.

Originally posted by hande
Moon pictures are very odd and these pictures usually dont look like real life pictures. Usually horizon lines etc. looks very stupid, sharp lines etc. Here is one example. How they edited photos really?

Do you mean this? The cylinder like object in the sky?



Well could be anything - except a UFO!!

Cheers!

Hi i have been playing with the photo 5454 and have been running filters on it. I came up with some intresting results, the only problem is that i dont know how to upload the photo. Please help.

For me looks like a city.... I have 20/20

reply to post by Komodo


The Earth is way far away, it doesn't look right.

well i dont go around adjusting the brightness on all of my downloaded space photos but in doing so experimentally even here on earth the same outcome is obtainable. Especially with dated software like acdsee that interprets that data without considering the header information as details.

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Hi i have been playing with the photo 5454 and have been running filters on it. I came up with some intresting results, the only problem is that i dont know how to upload the photo. Please help.

Ok. Here goes...

1. Upload to an Image Hosting site like Photo Bucket or Image Shack. (Free to register):

photobucket.com...

imageshack.us...

2. Copy and paste the url of your uploaded pic here. Add '[ats]' before the url and '[ /ats]' after it without any spaces.

3. Check it out after clicking the 'Preview Post' button.

4. Change the size of the image, if required, like this:

[ats=700x350] instead of just a plain [ats]. Remember, the width (Across) should not be more than '700', ie, the first figure. The second figure denotes the length. You can find out the size of the original image by clicking the 'right' mouse button on it.

Cheers!

reply to post by sheep10110


I'm no expert by any means, but one can tell alot just by mere observation. Thx for the reply sheep10110. I didn't even see that till you mentioned it. Good catch..I'll have to reexamine the photo.

It's the horizon of the moon. Why would we even see the curvature of the moon even though it's 1/4 the size of the earth

The Moon's diameter is 3,474 km,[6] a little more than a quarter that of the Earth

source

Originally posted by Komodo
It's the horizon of the moon. Why would we even see the curvature of the moon even though it's 1/4 the size of the earth

I don't understand, you say that because the Moon is smaller we should not see that it is round better than we see Earth?

Is that it?

Double post, sorry.

[edit on 12/8/2008 by ArMaP]

I think what he means is that how come you can see the curvature of the moon when here on earth if you look out at sea you dont see any curvature. Its just a straight horizon. Even though the moon is 1/4 the size of earth surely its still too big to see any curvature?

I think thats what he was getting at but could be wrong...

reply to post by Lee_K

According to www-lib.ksc.nasa.gov... the altitude was between 59 and 59.5 nautical miles at the time the ascent stage docked the CSM. Now do the math and check that the Moon must look 70 times bigger than the Earth. It does.

[edit on 2008-8-13 by nablator]

First of all let me just say that I do believe that they went to the moon. There is one picture in particular I found odd. Regarding light sources other than the sun.

Photo AS11-40-5903HR from the NASA Apollo image site
Apollo Image Site

Heres the Original



and Zoomed into the reflection on his visor.




I noticed a few things that I found odd but maybe someone here can clarify what I am seeing.

1. I've circled 2 spots at the top of the visor that look like reflections from what look like warehouse lights to me.

2. I've drawn arrows indicating the direction of the shadows cast which all seem pretty normal but in the area i've circled with the post to the left of the photo the casted shadow seems to be going in the opposite direction as if there was more than one light source causing this effect.

Im sure there is probably a rational explanation for this but I was wondering what everyones thoughts were on it.