It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
this reminded me of the above narrative.
He arrived to inform the local officers of an extraordinary event the had occurred during exercises in Siberia. Frogmen had encountered mysterious underwater swimmers, very human-like, but huge in size (almost three meters in height)! The swimmers were clad in tight-fitting silvery suits, despite icy-cold water temperatures. At the depth of fifty meters, these "swimmers" were not wearing aqualungs, but sphere-like helmets concealing their heads.
I am willing to tell my story ...but for compensation
Originally posted by reconpilot
reply to post by RiotComing
To bloody right mate !
Funny how we never get any credentials from the skeptics ,debunkers and spin merchants isnt it ?
In fact they never really tell you anything about themselves do they ?
Wonder why that might be ?
but they want to know all about you in their u2u's .
They poor crap on you in the thread then privately ask you for as much as you can tell them . Funny that .
Classic frat brat stand over manouvere .
And if you push them for cred they get nasty and threatening , bit like american intelligence .Whoops ,did I say intelligence and american at the same time .Sorry , My mistake .
Originally posted by TH3ON3
they know Dr. Mitchell is beyond reproach, and they are proly tired of killing everyone who tries to tell tghe truth so they get a man with say a history of "mental llness" to think he saw an alien when in fact it was a cgi possibly put there just for him, since they know he has a "history"!!!
Originally posted by RiotComing
Originally posted by TH3ON3
they know Dr. Mitchell is beyond reproach, and they are proly tired of killing everyone who tries to tell tghe truth so they get a man with say a history of "mental llness" to think he saw an alien when in fact it was a cgi possibly put there just for him, since they know he has a "history"!!!
Ok, so now we have the inevitable "mental illness" slur. Please provide your evidence, to back up your claims. I'm tired of seeing unfounded attacks levelled at whistleblowers; the guy who kept posting that 'Dr Greer is a closet homosexual' really grated me. Throwing enough mud in the hope some of it will stick. Poor form.
Originally posted by solo1
I don't wish to diminish the importance of the story but I just wish for once they would come forward before they became old and senile
Are Giants Returning to the Holy Land?
by Barry Chamish
Are the Anakim or the Refaim, the giants of the Bible, returning to Israel today? There are only two periods of recorded history when giants were reported in Israel; In biblical days from the time of the Flood to the ascension of King David and since 1993 in modern Israel.
The case for the return of giants to Israel is strong. In fact, what characterizes the current Israeli UFO wave from others in the world, is the shere abundance of physical evidence left behind by the visitors. Consider the first incident to usher Israel into the UFO age.
www.mt.net
Originally posted by Tha Joker
reply to post by prevenge
Well if what you say is true then why would they allow it to be introduced to the media at all? Especially with a measley $500 compensation? Like I said, its already on the internet for free so why wouldn't he just use the INet as a means to distribute his story to anyone that wants to see it for free. I mean, that's what he's doing already.
[edit on 7/29/08 by Tha Joker]
Originally posted by RiotComing
reply to post by TH3ON3
Hang on, you are still labeling Mr McClelland a "crazie". Please state where you are getting this information from. Links would be quite helpful.
Your theory holds water, I understand where you are coming from, but where is the evidence of McClelland's "history as a nutter with mental illness"? From what I've read, McClelland has been on the outer with NASA for a long time, ever since he's gone about exposing the organisation. So how do we know that your "cover debunk" theory isn't a cover itself to prevent the truth?