It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
Originally posted by mental modulator
In order to appease your protests, however I could not edit my OP...
You still don't get the point do you? The point was that politics involved backstabbing, Scott was fired for incompetence, and is now trying to "get back." Its not shocking, it happens with someone every presidency. Your urge to make it more than it really is just showed you were heavily media programmed.
Originally posted by mental modulator
First of all I do find it very strange that I have been accused of being "TRENDY"
by three people... I am convinced that there is a shared source for this theory and
the term "TRENDY"
The "source" for this theory is - and I urge everyone to sit down for this part - the peer reviewed research on social trends. I know, I know. Most of ATS can't be bothered to source anything beyond a conspiracy blog, and the thought of using actual academic research to form your point is shocking.
Originally posted by mental modulator
Did the other two people copy your theory in regards to the genesis of my opinions and thoughts?
No, they did their research. You should try it, you'll be surprised how much you learn when you go beyond the propganda.
You need to work on your deflection tactics, your too easy to expose. Stop drinking that DNC kool-aid and wake up.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
reply to post by ALightinDarkness
You need to work on your deflection tactics, your too easy to expose
Hilarious....
You really must live in an interesting world.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
reply to post by mental modulator
I'm not going to do your research for you. Those who have done the research have known about this phenomena since the Vietnam era. If you want to get started, try reading:
Jenkins, H. 2004. The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1): 33-43
Schuman, H. 1972. Two sources of antiwar sentiment. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(3): 513-536.
There are hundreds more. But I've done my research, I'm not doing yours. The creation of anti-war sentiment manufactured through cultural forces and turned into a trendy social movement has been carefully studied since the Vietnam War, and it has happened in every war since then.
[edit on 28-7-2008 by ALightinDarkness]
Originally posted by slicobacon
I have a question for all the "I have always been against this war crowd" out there- where were you when the idea of this war was floating around Congress? All I remember is a huge surge of patriotism after 911 and don't recall hearing any anti-war sentiment, not even from CNN. Bush's approval rating was high and everyone was sporting American Flags chanting "Lets Roll" ready to take on the evildoers. Now there is a "trend" to be anti-Bush and anti-war, most of it set forth by the MSM when the war ended too quickly to keep their projected ratings up. Yes - being anti-war at this point is as trendy as having a crush on your favorite left wing movie star.