Beings of light

I am a metaphysical kind of guy that does metaphysical kind of things and i would like to share them with you. These photo's are taken in my front yard in East Tennessee. This particular "being" is levitating about three feet off the ground. I know angels are beings of light that seem to have no gender but that doesn't particularly mean that all beings of light are angels. There are other entities in the photograph as well.

Another photograph of the same being from a little further away
There are humanlike faces in this photograph, they appear to be facing in different angles and directions.

Why are these type of photo's always blurry and hardly seeable?

I think it probably has to do with the composition of subject material, it they had a solid physical body then they would not be beings of light. Try thinking positive. I think i have a light image that is not blurred or grainy.

reply to post by debris765nju


Okay, fair enough. So, how exactly did you get these photo's? Did you just see a light being and snap a pic? Or did you do something to get the light being to appear, or what?

reply to post by debris765nju


definately looks like cigarette smoke to me

I see this kind of multi-dimensional photography in Granny's interpretations of Mars photos all the time but Im not allowed to tap into her files.

Its like the camera can see more than one organized pattern of light reflections even when the naked eye cant see anything but physical reality.

Lots of ghost pictures are like that and I think ufos also fall into this category because people discover ufos in pictures they took for different reasons and didnt know they were there.

When the drone was shifting back and forth in and out of a cloud over these hills last may I asked myself, Is it real or is it a mirage?

I still dont know for sure.


sarc

This is a most unusual slice of light, it is one of my personal favorites. I can tell you several things about this particular light, it is being guided from within, it is a mode of transportation for beings of light, not the only mode, but one of them. It also blows a lot of our scientific principles out of the water, a few principals also, Einstien, Albert thought that the speed of light was 186,000mps, that is clearly wrong. This light is going way slowed than that. Light has shape, form, corners, fronts, backs, sides, just a whole bunch of things. Light does not necessarily dispel darkness, sometimes it attracts it. The problem with humanity is that accede their decision making capabilities to narrow minded people with a Phd after their name. That is not an insult, these people devote a majority of their life to a single subject and have difficulty seeing around it.

Some of your pictures remind me of this picture.

reply to post by ThatSleepParalysisGuy

Fair question, They come by to see me, i feel their presence and send my wife out to take photographs, i have difficulty walking, peripheral neuropathy in my arms and legs. I take "shaky" photograph's and my sense of balance is worse in darkness. In answer to why? Because i seem to be to only person that can consciously see and photograph them.

also...if you look at some of the paintings of LISI HOFF
Paintings...link...look at the composition...www.beingsoflight.com...

www.beingsoflight.com...

Yes it does indeed resemble the ones i am posting, in no way am i claiming to have a lock on this type visitation. I am glad more people have captured the same images, perhaps we can make more people aware of what is taking place all around them.

reply to post by debris765nju


Oh, thank you that clears some things up. Your photo's are really interesting, and so are light beings or beings of light as I have never really heard of them. Have you always seen light beings? And can you talk to them?

reply to post by debris765nju


While I don't doubt the credibility of some of these photos, this one just looks like you've taken a picture of some smoke. Not convinced by this particular one I'm afraid.

reply to post by sarcastic


I think part of it has to do with digital camera's being able to see more of the spectrum than the human eye, these images are scanned by our computers and printers and representative colors fill in the spectrum we cannot see.

Good Job Debris. You know that I'm generally one of your opponents, but these really are some great shots. I don't believe in your theories about the world at large... but these are excellent photos IMO. Good thread.

can you describe how you feel them? Do you see them, or does the camera only see them. What do you think they are doing?

reply to post by seagrass


Hello all, thanks. The photo's all all real, even the one's that look like smoke. How to define how i see/sense/feel them. I can see them in the right light, sunlight is worst, twilight is best, a greenish tint seem to help visibility, but that just might be me. I feel them in my eyes and sinus cavities, like blunt pinpricks. I feel them as a weight against my skin and i feel them in my body. I communicate with them, after a fashion. One of the primary methods is synchronous photographs, the colors differ but the patterns are remarkably similiar.

I think i used about 260 pictures in this slidevideo. The entities you will see are not usually visible to the human eye, these will play tricks with your eyes.www.youtube.com...

[edit on 023030p://am3003 by debris765nju]

These beings of light look an awful lot like plain old smoke. Smoke, and light, are really not the same thing. Why arent they called beings of smoke? The first one that is all blurry makes it look more like light, but the one that is "further back" makes it look like smoke.

And the transport system one just looks like a doctored photograph. Of course, I am not an expert on photography, but I have seen a fair amount of smoke in my life.

Edit to add;

The fact that the photos are "real" does not mean they are not real photos of smoke, or real doctored photos. Are you claiming that there was no alteration done to these photos at all? If so, maybe we can get some of the resident photo experts to weigh in on that if you post all the data they normally ask for.

[edit on 29-9-2008 by Illusionsaregrander]