Alien Being Walking on Mars? IMAGE

reply to post by internos


Imagination... yeah definately. What do you think about the light though? It does seem to be wrong as if the image has been changed.

I think it is a rock, but what could cause it to move? Maybe an alien is just out of the picture who pushed this rock...

Thanks for those images internos and armap! High quality work!
You guys rock! (No pun intended)

reply to post by DataWraith

Take a pencil or small iron bar to a sand pit, throw it a few times and take note of the impressions it leaves. unless you throw it hard and high up it will never stick 4rse up. skim it acoss the ground and you might get the 'footprint' type marks as it bounces but it will not come to rest in a vertical position.

I would consider the experiment but I have no way of creating 1/3 gravity which would be a necessary factor. Physics(physical) may play differently and I do not have the necessary math to make for any assumption. But given that gravity is less than earth, I assumed that the impact may have been in a distance much further away than we would assume if we were watching something on earth play out. The stone may even be of a low density type. It would not be too far fetched since I have dropped a nickle, more than once, and land edge up.
I respect your input and invite it.

I'm starting at age 50 to start believing John Lear about Nasa deliberately misleading the public in profound ways. His estimates for gravity on Moon and Mars are greater than the Nasa dogma of 1/6 and 1/3 respectively. I don't have the physics background to prove that,however. I only have certain pieces of the puzzle to add to the overall picture. Mars heads disembodied.

reply to post by internos

Internos,thanks for posting the bottom line further to the second smaller boulder.I was hesitant to do so,since if it did veer sharply at the end of a straight line that would have been dramatic and sharper an angle than I was willing to accept for certain. I thought that it was there co-incidentally perhaps and had a longer straight line to it that didn't show up well. I'm saying I see how yours is most likely the case,but I stopped before the near 90 degree angle for my comfort level. In my model the smaller boulder is much smaller than yours. So small I can only see the path.

I agree with Internos an Armap boulder teory.

The path is consistent with others "rolling boulders" mars pictures taken.

It\'s not an alien being

Originally posted by super70
This was cropped from IAS viewer image PSP_008938_1750_RED.NOMAP.JP2

It appears to be an upright being walking across a sandy Mars surface. The long shadow shows the height of the creature, while the head and shoulders are clearly visible. If this were indeed a rock rolling across the sand, it would leave a straight line of imprints, not a zig-zag pattern. The height of the "rock" from its long shadow would indicate that it would leave long flat imprints, not footstep sized prints.

Click on the image to view its full size.



[edit on 25-7-2008 by super70]

if u look in the middle of his footprint pattern (this is having read the US marine sniping manual) he not only must have been drunk, but if you look in the middle there is an unmolested patch of land that forms a gap between his prints. that gap is as tall as/if not taller then he is judging by the pic using common sense. so he's wobbling and randomly leaping really far forward... and fi that was the case you'd see where he landed, it would have a harder impact.

not saying the pic isn't weird or non-interesting, just that in my opinion this is not a creature walking at all, and if that is a creature those aren't his damn footprints. those aren't footprints at all, IMO, but i'm not sure as to what they are other then some sort of natural occurance.

as always, just my opinion.

peace.

Death Valley has conditions similar to that of how mars' surface is, there are "moving rocks" in death valley, the trails of which are very similar to that of the rocks in your picture.

More info at
www.geeksniper.com...

Somebody told me about

areo.info...

and so I went there and in about ten minutes I found a bunch of photos with people walking around ON MARS just like uptown.

I think theres something wrong with NASA because what they say is not the same as the data they allow to be presented to the world.

This is really strange! WTF is going on here?


sarc

reply to post by sarcastic


Are you sure you went to that site?

That site has the same photos as the NASA site for the rovers, it even says "The images are automatically created daily from raw data available at JPL Marsrovers Gallery".

PS: it's amazing how people are just discovering a three years old site, it shows how people have been "researching"...

Sarcastic,could you post a few pic links so we can see what you are talking about? I hope you are not kidding and are really onto something. This pic is reduced extremely and negative of an Emily Cragg site shot.It's only to illustrate the vague impressions of Mars faces.

Meteorites hit Mars all the time,and are less burned-up than those on Earth because of Mars slighter atmosphere.Since Mars has no visible vegetation on the surface (for certain) other than say molds and lichens perhaps with definitive evidence,the rolling rocks go mostly un-impeded.They hit more rocks and roll to a stop.But in dusty ,sandy soil the pattern is shown as a handy trail to observe the footprint.The rolls or hops are very worthwhile to study. The other possibility introduced in this post was rolling rocks from cliffs and hill tops.Those rolling rocks would tend to occur in groups rather than individual deep impact hits.

[edit on 7-8-2008 by vze2xjjk]

reply to post by vze2xjjk

PLEASE EXCUSE THIS SEEMING DOUBLE POST IF IT APPEARS AS SO/EDIT GONE WRONG. THanks Fortunately later when more detailed pics of this area are taken the entire path of 1/4 mile can be an illustration of a standard rolling meteorite "HIT and SPLIT" can be used to illustrate how physics on Mars allows for gravity effects on incoming asteroids which may come in waves of regular observable patterns such as the LEONIDS on Earth.These can be Mars Asteroid parties where eager observers watch them fall on Mars much as they do on Earth as METEOR SHOWERS. The difference is that on Earth it can be REAL TIME,whereas Mars would be delayed pics,but some innovative viewing strategies could be incorporated to watch the simultaneous Meteor showers on both Earth and Mars for comparison.

Originally posted by beforetime
im gonna flag this because...

a rock isnt going to skip in oblong pattern's to mimic footstep's.

and it's kinda tall or as the shadow is implying .

so wind is out if the picture .


hmmm by gosh this could be footstep's.
but by what.

Check this out, maybe this can help explain what you're seeing in the photo... Maybe the same phenomena is occurring in this photo as what happens in Death Valley.. ?

Death Valley Moving Rocks

The reason that they move
along the 10,000 year old dried up clay lake bed is still somewhat of a mystery

Page Source

reply to post by ElectricUncleSam


Not only does not the track looks like that but the situation is also completely different, on your photo (that has already been posted) we see a flat surface, the photo from Mars shows a slope.

Not sure where those images were from but here some more pics of rolling rocks...

couldnt find the orignal image to it, but heres the link

marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov...

if you zoom in all the way on the crater in the center..look around the edges there's a few of the rolling rocks.

They are rolling rocks in my opinion too.

Originally posted by super70
This was cropped from IAS viewer image PSP_008938_1750_RED.NOMAP.JP2

It appears to be an upright being walking across a sandy Mars surface. The long shadow shows the height of the creature, while the head and shoulders are clearly visible. If this were indeed a rock rolling across the sand, it would leave a straight line of imprints, not a zig-zag pattern. The height of the "rock" from its long shadow would indicate that it would leave long flat imprints, not footstep sized prints.

Click on the image to view its full size.



[edit on 25-7-2008 by super70]

Wow.
(I have had to google to find this thread for I couldn't open the official photo.) So by clicking on it, to see the full size image, it appears that, as I expected, the 'creature' has previously emerged from a hole. I think it may confirm a few theories. I firmly believe that there is underground life there.

Either it is animal or...else! I'll try to edit and put it on your other twin-thread about the trajectories. Excellent eyes, you have!

[edit on 4-10-2008 by MarsFanMag]