It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I remember, however, that it's possible to achieve auto-lensing, whereby the beam is focusing itself due to density gradient in the column of the air, which in turn is due to the temperature gradient imparted by the beam, on the gas.
When they do say something, they try to make sure it's worth saying first. Rather than spout off # that everybody is going to misinterpret.
38 Megawatts at a target?? And remember, this is assuming this laser weapon is a mobile one, fully self-contained...
The mobile Pamir-SU electro-generator, with an output of 15MW and a mass of around 20t, could supply power to long-range lasers and ultra-high-frequency weapon systems. It could be used both on the Earth and also in space.
www.flug-revue.rotor.com...
It's bullcrap. Unless the Soviets harnessed Anti-Matter Energy in the 1960's you can forget about them firing lasers at distances of 1000 miles.
You need about 3 portable Nuclear Power Stations for that or something.
You develop your technology based on the Laws of friggin' Physics, which Russia cannot defy.
some blog and online forum about Nuclear Missiles.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love the Russians. They really do never give up. They're so out of touch with everything. It amazes me. I mean, they see and understand everything. But they just remain so distant to all that happens.
One thing I'll give them. When they do say something, they try to make sure it's worth saying first. Rather than spout off # that everybody is going to misinterpret.
Another valid point, but remember the Soviets were supposed to have accomplished this in the late 60's to early 70's.
Even today they're still far from perfect and they still can't reach the moon.
he Luna programme (from the Russian word "Luna" meaning "Moon"), occasionally called Lunik or Lunnik, was a series of robotic spacecraft missions sent to the Moon by the Soviet Union between 1959 and 1976. Fifteen were successful, each designed as either an orbiter or lander, and accomplished many firsts in space exploration. They also performed many experiments, studying the Moon's chemical composition, gravity, temperature, and radiation. Twenty-four spacecraft were formally given the Luna designation, although more were launched.
en.wikipedia.org...
with an output of 15MW and a mass of around 20t, could supply power to long-range lasers and ultra-high-frequency weapon systems.
soviets were harnessing power from nuclear reactors for such lasers
it is impossible for a nuclear reactor pumped laser to be mobile
it does not defy laws of physics
this is funny statement as most of my sources are scientific journals like federation of american scientists(fas),flug-revue(german scientific journal)
soviets reach the moon long before USA did with unmanned rovers and probes ....
Originally posted by audas
The reality is that for the most part of the Cold War the USSR smashed the US in tech dev - the ONLY thing which the U.S. actually won was the the lunar landing (debatable) - everything from ballistic development, satellite, manned space slights etc,etc, etc, all Russian achievements.
This debate is not about Russian ability, but rather American inability to see the truth surrounding their own vulnerability.
The title of this thread is Russia ‘Had Laser Cannons Before U.S. - and they did.
Russia to this day has completely outperformed America on weaponry - the U.S. have exercised a much greater ability in divesting themselves of all humanity - hence their relative advantage - for now.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by Bugman82
Exactly right. They always do, which is why I was asking people to find credible sources to prove Russia could create these laser weapons systems back in the 1960's/70's
How are you going to put that on a plane, or a tank for that matter? That's far more than the regular payload of most bombers, far too heavy and impractical for mobile laser systems.
This was not possible back in the 1960's, I'm sorry but it's too far of a stretch.
And I do mean ridiculous. More than the combined outputs of several civilian-sized Nuclear Reactors. 38 Megawatts, etc...
The first chemical laser was patented in 1965, and in just 4 years they allegedly had refined chemical lasers to the point where the Soviets were using them on the field, in battle, on mobile weapons platforms in the Sino-Soviet War (1969)?
A 2006 editorial written by Marc Monthioux and Vladimir Kuznetsov in the journal Carbon has described the interesting and often misstated origin of the carbon nanotube. A large percentage of academic and popular literature attributes the discovery of hollow, nanometer sized tubes composed of graphitic carbon to Sumio Iijima of NEC in 1991.[1] In 1952 L. V. Radushkevich and V. M. Lukyanovich published clear images of 50 nanometer diameter tubes made of carbon in the Soviet Journal of Physical Chemistry.[2] This discovery was largely unnoticed, as the article was published in the Russian language, and Western scientists' access to Soviet press was limited during the Cold War. It is likely that carbon nanotubes were produced before this date, but the invention of the transmission electron microscope allowed the direct visualization of these structures.
en.wikipedia.org...
Why is this technology still classified after the break up of the Soviet Union? The Russians literally opened their vaults after the collapse of Communism and every secret they had, the US now knows.
If the Soviets really had such advanced directed-laser weapons in the 1960's, I'm sure the US would know by now.
And according to the Russian representative, fully operational in 1972, I would be more inclined to believe this if it was in the 80's but 1972 seems a bit of a stretch in my opinion.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
what i fail to understand is , How is it possible that the Russians are far superior in intellect and weaponry, yet they lost the Cold War and their economy collapsed in the face of the inferior idiot Americans?
This article is fiction right ?
Originally posted by Lethil
Well for one russian scientists have *ALWAYS* been ahead of americans...funding was the problem,but i see no reason why they didnt create these before the Americans...
Originally posted by manson_322
Originally posted by muzzleflash
what i fail to understand is , How is it possible that the Russians are far superior in intellect and weaponry, yet they lost the Cold War and their economy collapsed in the face of the inferior idiot Americans?
This article is fiction right ?
yes they had superior weaponry , but a very inferior civilian economy , thus they collapsed
Originally posted by Lethil
Well for one russian scientists have *ALWAYS* been ahead of americans...funding was the problem,but i see no reason why they didnt create these before the Americans...
and if russians were accustomed to make calims like these , then why did they always claim that they are severely lacking in comparison to West in terms of Computer and communications technology
[edit on 24-7-2008 by manson_322]
[edit on 24-7-2008 by manson_322]