It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
With all due respect to all religions and all versions of God, it's all nonsense. If there is a God, what mankind thinks about him/she/it is beside the point. Religion is, in fact, the opiate of the masses. And, while I agree that religion means well (don't steal, kill etc..at least on paper,) in mankind's hands, the result has been that there have been more deaths in the name of God than all the diseases, wars and other natural calamities put together.
Originally posted by Bludrgon
After reading below if he does not belive in a god what would make you think he acutally belives in Demon gods?
www.genesimmons.com...
Response from Gene:
With all due respect to all religions and all versions of God, it's all nonsense. If there is a God, what mankind thinks about him/she/it is beside the point. Religion is, in fact, the opiate of the masses. And, while I agree that religion means well (don't steal, kill etc..at least on paper,) in mankind's hands, the result has been that there have been more deaths in the name of God than all the diseases, wars and other natural calamities put together.
If God is up there watching, for heaven sakes stop us from killing each other. Especially in your name.
Originally posted by Oldtimer2
I know a lady who bought KISS's old place in Conn,she had a priest come in and bless the place before her or kids would go inside
Originally posted by Raist
While I am not a follower or believer of “demon gods” I have to ask. How do you know “demon gods” demand the blood of children, or any blood for that matter? Also is it then the followers of these “demon gods” that are often confused with Satanists? Seeing as how Satanists do not even require the blood of children or anything like that in their practice I would assume that people are getting the two confused.
Raist
Originally posted by Raist
While I do not doubt his appetite for sex and a large number of women on that list I believe 4800 might be a bit over the top. Even with 60 years of having sex that is 80 different partners a day. That breaks down to 3.333 every hour. Sorry but that in itself is slightly hard to believe. I would be more likely to believe half that even that pushes the limits of any mortal man.
Raist
Originally posted by Raist[...] 4800 might be a bit over the top. Even with 60 years of having sex that is 80 different partners a day. That breaks down to 3.333 every hour.
Originally posted by gekko
One partner a day for thirteen years and a month is enough (1 x 365 x 13,15 = 4800). If he spent thirty years he would only need to, er, "know" a couple of new girls a week.
I'm up for it! Where do I start praying??
Originally posted by kshaund
can only say if these words were truly spoken, that the masses are truly well, and I mean very well, hypnotized into a deep, deep slumber as these words casually rolled from her lips