It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pinktip
Can someone explain this to me?
biz.yahoo.com...
How does bailing out banks with borrowed or printed money
strengthen the dollar?....
Originally posted by Sir Solomon
reply to post by AtlantisAgain
Ah, Free market at its best. *coughs* No seriously, it's best to let some banks roll over and die because they are the "fat" in the system. Propping up banks that can't sustain themselves is bad business and government.
In the 1920's there were about 25,000 banks in the US. As of March 2008, there were 7248. Sure that means more money in fewer hands, but at the same time that streamlines the flow of money in the economy, and the faster that money flows, the better the economy is.
Now granted, there are times when larger banks just cannot be allowed to fail, this is because of how failed banks are taken care of. They are broken up and those pieces bought up by "stronger" banks. So if Hercules Banks falls while lifting a mountain, you can't ask the other 7000 men standing there of all different sizes to take over his job, because they'll get squashed. That's when the government steps in to handle it because they are the only other source of help. Of course many times it comes with strings attached that trip people.....
Originally posted by Sir Solomon
Originally posted by Pinktip
Can someone explain this to me?
biz.yahoo.com...
How does bailing out banks with borrowed or printed money
strengthen the dollar?....
It doesn't follow logic does it? This is a case of perceived value by the market.
Because the banks are being propped up by the government, people feel that it is safer to invest in the dollar (by picking up US denominated securities on the market). This demand raises the value of the dollar despite a surge in supply.