CIT is now Officially documented by the Center for Military History and the Library of Congress !!!!

I would like to give the CIT credit and I think that they deseve praise for now having their work "officially documented"!!
This is awesome news!
I think that this is one step closer to solving what occured at the Pentagon!!!
Great work Craig!!!
Can either a representative of the CIT or someone else who is familiar with the Center for Military History please provide a link to how this was documented?
I guess the Libray of Congress also officially documented this so any link to this info would be helpful as well!
Thanks in advance!!
Great job Craig!!
Now that you have this Official Documentation it should be even easier to get the evidence before a court, right?

CIT??? Sorry but???

thanks

Since you had to start a new thread about your misinterpretation of what Craig said:

Originally posted by TheBobert

Officially documented by the Center for Military History and the Library of Congress

Can you please elaborate more on this?
How was this "Officially Documented"?

Nice try at a straw man there. Why don't you actually read what is posted instead of going off half-cocked at what you THINK you are reading?

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Most of the new witnesses we will be presenting have already been officially documented by the Center for Military History and the Library of Congress.

Notice he said "Have already been officially documented"? Instead of the cut and paste job you did?

Now the Army's 305th Military History Detachment has the job of making sense of the madness. It is interviewing every willing survivor and witness -- a number that could climb into the thousands -- to write the U.S. government's book on the Pentagon assault and the lessons that can be learned from it.

www.post-gazette.com...

Over the past year and in almost every section of the Library of Congress, staff have sought and received an abundance of original material including prints, photographs, drawings, poems, eye-witness accounts and personal reactions, headlines, books, magazines, songs, maps, videotapes and films.

www.loc.gov...

I'm getting very tired of you "debunkers" misconstruing what everyone says into something that you think they said. You, jthomas and Seymour Butz are the worst at reading comprehension.

I understood what Craig ment. Why didn't you?

Why does ATS keep allowing skeptics like "TheBobert" to break their cardinal rule?

Any inappropriate comments, insults, topic derailment, or trolling will result in immediate posting ban or account termination.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by im_being_censored


Maybe the same reason that banned members like KT rejoin using a sock puppet and get away with it.

It's a big forum and the moderators may not notice.

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by im_being_censored

 

Maybe the same reason that banned members like KT rejoin using a sock puppet and get away with it.

It's a big forum and the moderators may not notice.

Maybe they realized their ban was unjustly.

What tremendous odds that is. Do you agree bobert is breaking this forum's rule by his reoccurring use of ad-hom attacks?

I was going by the CIT preview video where those words are posted.
If he posted that elsewhere I didnt see it so Giff you are wrong when you said that I CC&P.

Originally posted by im_being_censored
Why does ATS keep allowing skeptics like "TheBobert" to break their cardinal rule?

Any inappropriate comments, insults, topic derailment, or trolling will result in immediate posting ban or account termination.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

REPORT IT THEN and let the mods decide instead of acting like a hall monitor.
CIT is making the claim and I am just congratulating them and asking when they will bring their evidence to a court.
I am sorry that I hurt your feelins.

reply to post by TheBobert


Did it ever occur to you that the fact that you can't even keep a positive ATS rating is reflective upon your posts?



Quit wasting everyones time. :yawn:

reply to post by im_being_censored


I didn't see an ad-hom attack in the OP.

Could you please point it out?

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by im_being_censored

 

I didn't see an ad-hom attack in the OP.

Could you please point it out?

The OP wasn't being snide/condescending?

reply to post by im_being_censored


Not to me. It actually seemed rather praiseful.

Am I missing something?

reply to post by Sublime620


ouch man that hurts!!!!!!

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by im_being_censored

 

Not to me. It actually seemed rather praiseful.

Am I missing something?

Play stupid all you want. It just reflects badly on your credibility.

LOL man some people woke up on the wrong side of the tin foil hat tonight!
Hi Killtown!!!!


[edit on 8-7-2008 by TheBobert]

reply to post by im_being_censored


I find a no-planer questioning my credibility to be quite amusing.

At least I'm playing.

Originally posted by TheBobert
LOL man some people woke up on the wrong side of the tin foil hat tonight!

Why the insult?

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by im_being_censored

 

I find a no-planer questioning my credibility to be quite amusing.

Nice ad-hom attack.

BTW, please show me plane debris entangled in any of the twin towers gashes and/or plane debris on the ground near the base of the towers where plane debris would have fallen.

reply to post by im_being_censored


Why would you think he was talking to you? Unless? You ? are ?

NAh.......

reply to post by im_being_censored


No way dude! You've been at this game for a long time and you also know that there are no publicly available pictures of aircraft debris in front of the towers, below the entry points, or you would not have asked me to show them. I know the rules that you play by.

Next question.