It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
Originally posted by thematrix
Owning some shares into that company doesn't make you privy to any information or gives you any power.
If someone "good" were to buy a controlling share into the company, the govt would simply use another company to do this with.
These chips are simple. Pushing them for mass forced implementation is whats hard.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
Originally posted by SystemiK
I think you are vastly overestimating the power of a shareholder. If you were to own half the stock thats one thing. Having a few thousand dollars in it though would be like owning one drop of a lake. How are you going to control all of those waves with just one drop?
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
Originally posted by Ian McLean
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
At the very least you get a nice shiny annual report; makes for interesting reading and looks impressive on the coffee table.
Considering Verichip specifically, if you're going to postulate "Verichip is a tool of the NWO for implementing their nefarious bio-chipping plans!", then it seems to me that it is not too much of a stretch to argue "Verichip is a disinformation ploy, to obscure what the NWO really has up their sleeves, and how they will implement their nefarious plans!"
Either way, some interesting (and more 'philosophical') points:
- Does minuscule, practically irrelevant ownership of a corporation allow for a more valid assertion of an individual's moral stance with regard to that company's practices?
- Can a well-meaning person, taking such small ownership upon themselves, effect a significant change?
- Is this practice morally valid? For example, would you buy stock in a tobacco company to help prevent lung cancer?
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
Originally posted by RRconservative
I just finished reading a book by Dan Brown "Digital Fortress" (A conservative Republican reading? Go figure? )
I know it is a work of fiction and I'm not gonna go in to details, but something like Verichip would easily be crushed by the NSA.
Go ahead and get Verichip if you think it will make your info safe. The government likes it that way!
[edit on 25-6-2008 by RRconservative]
[edit on 25-6-2008 by RRconservative]
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
But this thread is about turning that around, by purchasing the stock. They can not go against shareholders wishes if enough people buy it.
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
Originally posted by jetxnet
I tried buying shares for this stock but stated I needed to call E*Trade and could not do online for this stock.