How CIT uses "witnesses" to promote the No Plane/Wrong Plane Theory

reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT


Typical... the ones you were unable to interview you dismiss as suspect.

When are you showing the flight path with the appropriate math? Keep dodging it Craig... until you show a possible flight path...you got nuttin.

TY,

Are you saying it is impossible for a plane to cross over from the south side of Columbia Pike to the north side, fly over the Navy Annex, on the north side of the Citgo, next to or on the edge of Arlington Cemetery and bank/turn towards the Pentagon impact area and throttle it?

Typical... Debunkers/disinfo agents start a thread about how CIT 'uses' witnesses to promote a theory, and then post "eyewitness" quotes to prove his theory wrong from people who weren't even eyewitnesses. At least Craig uses testimony from REAL eyewitness people...

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT

There is plenty of evidence that it was going much slower than officially reported besides the fact that the official flight path is completely fraudulent since we know the plane came from east of the Potomac and flew over the Navy Annex and north of the former CITGO.

We don't buy it, Craig Ranke.

Ok Craig I think I see where you are coming from.....
All the witnesses that saw the plane hit the pentagon are plants/shills while your own witnesses who saw it hit the Pentagon were fooled.
Is that about right?
At least Judy Woods at the guts to take her beam theory to a real court, why not the CIT?
DO IT CRAIG!
Prove the skeptics wrong!

It's absolutely 100% impossible that there were eyewitnesses who saw a plane hit the Pentagon, because no plane hit the Pentagon!

There's only three things these "eyewitnesses" can be; plants (government stooges), private citizens and public servants who were coerced (strong-armed and forced to lie), or legally blind.

Peace

and your evidence is?

reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT


Craig...

Map out your claims, and attach the math that supports your claim.

We will see how possible it is.

thank you

reply to post by Dr Love


Dr. Love,

Do you have evidence what so ever to support your posts? You are claiming people were "strong-armed?". The rest at the Pentagon were "stooges?"

I'm surprised as a mod at this forum, you would actually post a statement like that.

Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

 

Craig is a hard worker on 911 truth. This much is true.

Bottom line. He can not and will not ever provide ANY flight path that will back up any witness statements.

6 years after the fact.... the math will not change.

Would you be interested in showing the math that proves flight 77 hit the pentagon? Because it hasnt been released yet to any public knowledge. The only thing we have to go on is an FDR whos data does not show the flight ending at the pentagon, and eyewitnesses. Eyewitnesses are not proof either way.

Thanks in advance.

Originally posted by Dr Love
It's absolutely 100% impossible that there were eyewitnesses who saw a plane hit the Pentagon, because no plane hit the Pentagon!

Whoah, this is such circular logic it makes your head spin.

Surely this is satire? I really hope so.