It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As i said before, Barack Obama is the only candidate that has stooped to the all-time low of paying people to disrupt forum threads.
Originally posted by Hal9000
Well if your wondering if I am being paid, as I told you before, I wish I was. I just like the name.
Nobody is hounding BH. Responding to a thread and providing input does not equal harrassment except in your book possibly.
If you are not being paid, then you must be obsessed. I will ask a similar question that I asked jamie in this post which has not been answered,... Why are you so obsessed with this? Why are you and jamie hounding another member only because they don't agree with you?
You're the only rude and flippant person I see on this thread, I've remained calm and civilized when addressing you or BH. Once again, Practice what you preach..
Maybe you should try to show a little yourself. Thanks.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I was thrilled to see this forum take form. I supported it strongly from the beginning. Sadly, it has become, for the most part, nothing but stupid, wild and crazy conspiracy theories and rumors aimed at the nominees.
I think the membership of ATS is better than that. I hope it is. I think we can do better.
I have been seduced into the defense of "my candidate" one too many times on these ridiculous threads. And I'm making a personal pledge to NOT participate in these meaningless, mudslinging threads any more. I invite you to join me.
I want to talk about the issues, not the rumors of the religion of the candidate and not his birth certificate and not what his estranged brother supposedly said or what he called his wife. We have an important election coming up and we need to vote on what's important, not nonsensical rumors and trivialities.
I'm a dog trainer and the VERY best way to train a dog not to do something is to IGNORE the bad and PRAISE the good. Now, I'm not saying that ATS members are dogs, but some dog psychology actually works on humans, too, if you know what I mean. Ignore a behavior and it will fizzle out.
I want to do my part to raise the quality of the threads in this forum. Please join me. Go to On the Issues or another similar site and tell us what you think of the issues of your favorite (or least favorite) candidates. You can post in the thread in my signature or start a thread of your own about a particular issue you wish to talk about and explore. Let's make this forum something that people will use as a reference when they want to see where their candidates stand and the "good" and "bad" about them.
As nefermore said, Be the Change You Wish to See Let's change this forum from a trash dump of wild speculation to intelligent discussion about the upcoming election. Something respectable that we can be proud of instead of embarrassed of.
Thanks for your consideration.
Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Thanks for all the positive feedback!
And remember one of the important points in the first post here:
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Ignore a behavior and it will fizzle out.
Let's practice that in this very thread, whaddya say?
And another reminder: There are other areas on the board to discuss rumors and have great fun bashing one's favorite (or least favorite) candidates. Don't forget Slug Fest and Politicians and People.
[edit on 16-6-2008 by Benevolent Heretic]
you seem to be a very thoughtful and reasonable person. however people against obama far far out number any posts put out about mccain. and they are NOT, NOT, intent on discussing anything useful, only deragatory attacks on his charecter. i have been adding up these posts and it's more then 10 to 1 attacking obama. in fact, it's hard to find any (charecter-bashing) posts that attack mccain. this has been for the most part all one-sided.
Originally posted by gormly
I have to note that you did post a comment in this very thread specifically refering to an attack on Obama (and not using a similar example with McCain)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I want to talk about the issues, not ... what he called his wife.
that doesn't exactly shout unbiased...
and isn't quoting yourself a bit much?