It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I stopped reading picture books when I was 5...
Originally posted by Universal Light
I do not understand how you can comment without reading it through.
OK, try this. Pick a hand, either hand. Try wiggling your middle finger up and down without moving any of your other fingers. Can you do it? If not, which other finger tends to move more at the same time, the ring or the index? For me, and almost everyone I've met, it's the ring finger. The only people I've ever met with truly independent finger control were professional musicians who'd spent years developing that finger independence.
I don't know how I can dismiss it all as coincidence.
Originally posted by Universal Light
I also believe google is a horrible source for the truth.
Perhaps not, but Eric does himself a great disservice if he wants anyone to take him seriously and he continues to fill his books with these meaningless photos. For starters, there are only so many positions the human hand can possibly form under normal circumstances. Additionally, he's selectively editing to only show those photos which he believes support his claims. It's ludicrous and makes him look like a fool, rendering any textual argument he might have to make easily dismissed.
Originally posted by Universal Light
And I knew this repsonse was coming as truthfully, when I started reading it, I thought the exact same thing. But there's too many poses of the same thing over and over. Also, the whole premise is not derived around that one concept.
Fair enough, and I apologize if I was quick to lump you with your peers. I fought Eric's lies enough while he was here, and wasn't looking forward to the possibility that his tactics might be resurfacing through a new channel. Glad to hear I was wrong.
Please do not put words in my mouth considering what I regard to be proof as I have not spoken to my opinion on that. If you really want what I consider to be standards of proof, I believe there's no such thing. Proof cannot exist imo because everything initially derived from someone's imagination.
Also, please do not put words into my mouth regarding what I think to be a conspiracy as I haven't commented on that either.
Originally posted by Universal Light
If you really want what I consider to be standards of proof, I believe there's no such thing. Proof cannot exist imo because everything initially derived from someone's imagination.