It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SimpleTruth
However, the crusades were a response to Muslims pressing and forcing westward. A number of them actually reached Spain and started to take over. Now, I doubt the crusaders didn't do anything wrong, but they were making sure the Muslim forces didn't completely take over. Obviously they were successful.
Originally posted by SimpleTruth
[Also, there are some accounts that aren't in the bible, because they were never meant to be, for one reason or another. there are various reasons of credibility and such. the books that are actually in the bible are the most credible and pertinent out of all the documents of the various time periods.
Originally posted by Illmatic67
The Muslims conquered Spain and brought forth 800 years of knowledge, peace, and prosperity between all three Abrahamic religions... so what was so negative about the Muslims pressing westward?
Islam brought Europe out of the Dark Ages. If you forgot, it was Christianity that put Europe into the Dark Ages.
Please tell me what was so negative about the Muslims moving to Europe?
Originally posted by EmbryonicEssence
Muhammad didn't even exist until six centuries after Jesus.
Mu�ham�mad ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m-hmd, -h�md) also Mo�ham�med (m-, m-), 570?-632 A.D.
Arab prophet of Islam. At the age of 40 he began to preach as God's prophet of the true religion. Muhammad established a theocratic state at Medina after 622 and began to convert Arabia to Islam.
So if Muhammad is known as the forefather of Islam, then how could have Islam existed in Jesus' time?