Simple 100% OFFICIAL PROOF of N.W.O

You want Official evidence ?????

just ask the Officials themselves.

listen to what they ALL have to say about the "so called"
N.W.O



"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long."

President George Bush (January 1991)


"The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind."

George Herbert Walker Bush

"Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order."
32 U.S. Senators and 92 U.S. Representatives
in Washington, D.C. on January 30, 1976,
signed a "Declaration of Interdependence."

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis by original compiler], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992
Bilderburgers meeting.
Unbeknownst to Kissinger,
his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.

"My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order."
Henry Kissinger,
(in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order."
Mikhail Gorbachev,
in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

"We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age.... We see both in our country and elsewhere... ghosts of the old thinking.... When we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move toward a new world order...relying on the relevent mechanisms of the United Nations."
Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev,
at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid (1991)

The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order."
President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt,
in The New York Times (April 1995)

"The New World Order is a world that has a super-national authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order."

Willy Brandt, Former West German Chancellor
and former chairman of the Fifth Socialist International,
Chairman of the Brandt Commission in the late 1980's


Eisinhower said "Beware the military industrial complex."

"Capitalism is a thug's economy, a heartless economy, a base and vile and largely boring economy. It is the antithesis of human fulfillment and development. It mocks equity and justice. It enshrines greed... Capitalism sucks. Does anyone seriously want to contest that?" - Michael Albert

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller,
( founder of the Trilateral Commission),
in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission,
in June, 1991.

"The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'"

Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York,
in an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite:
Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order"
-- The New York Times (February 1962)

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
-David Rockefeller

"But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence."

David Rockefeller,
speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations,
September 14, 1994



"The global economy works for about twenty percent of the world, for about eighty percent it doesn't." - Kevin Danaher

"What I'm trying to do is to promote a process of reorganization of the world ..." President Clinton,
interview with Argentine reporters, October 17, 1997.

"In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion.' To use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
Richard N. Gardner,
in Foreign Affairs, April 1974


WELL...................
ITS OFFICIAL

I had not seen some of those quotes before. Thanks for that. It is gonna happen.

100%:

Not simple.
Not proof.

Talk about taking quotes completely out of context.


[edit on 13-5-2008 by bobafett1972]

How can you take "New World Order" out of context? NWO means one government with a global economy using one currency.

It works for 20% of the world (the rich) and the other 80% it doesn't (the not so rich).

Good Post!

Originally posted by jetxnet
How can you take "New World Order" out of context? NWO means one government with a global economy using one currency.

It works for 20% of the world (the rich) and the other 80% it doesn't (the not so rich).

Good Post!

Oh I am sorry to disagree.
I'll just not contribute my opinion from now on.
Yeah, okay.

The prosaic phrase, "New World Order" can main so many different things.
I'll leave it at that though.

You have a great day!

I agree that its often used as a buzz-word in speeches, but I am starting to believe more and more that Bilderberg are planning something big

Originally posted by jetxnet
How can you take "New World Order" out of context? NWO means one government with a global economy using one currency.

It works for 20% of the world (the rich) and the other 80% it doesn't (the not so rich).

Good Post!

Definiton
New : Having been seen, used, or known for a short time
World : The earth with its inhabitants and all things upon it

I don't think you can disagree with those two definitons, they can't really be taken out of context

Order:
1: A group of people united in a formal way
2: A sociopolitical system
3: The state of peace, freedom from confused or unruly behavior, and
respect for law or proper authority

But here the context can change everything. So like Bobafett1972 said, context can make the difference between a boring political speech and a acknowledgement of world governement

[edit on 13-5-2008 by Jigore]

Yippee !!
found some more 100% OFFICIAL PROOF



"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."
U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

"The Council on Foreign Relations is "the establishment." Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship."
Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."
New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

"In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power - political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
Republican candidate for President
in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

"Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite."
Senator William Jenner, 1954

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK,
in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight."
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Columbia University,
10 days before his assassination

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes."
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea - a new world order...to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind...based upon shared principles and the rule of law.... The illumination of a thousand points of light.... The winds of change are with us now."
President George Bush
In his State of the Union message during the Gulf War.

The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union). Out of these troubled times a New World Order can merge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."
George Bush,
September 11, 1990

Even though New World Order can be meant as several different things, it's pretty much only used to mention the "New World Order". I'll take jetxnet's side on this beast. And note that jetxnet put quotations around new world order (like this "New World Order"). You (jigore) broke that down into each word. Try this definition:

"New World Order- the post-Cold War organization of power in which nations tend to cooperate rather than foster conflict."

Bravo for bringing these quotes out into the open. Out of context? Heck, there's no way some of these quotes could mean anything other than what they appear to mean. I haven't read every one you posted so maybe you have this one already but George Bush Senior was quoted as saying that if the public knew all the things that he had done over the years, he'd be chased down the street by lynch mobs.

YAHOO

found a few more

"We shall have a World government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
James Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, before the U.S. Senate


"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
William Colby (Former CIA Director)


"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions."
- Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994


This has been understood, at least inchoately, ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Then the call was for a new world order. But a new order presumes a new consensus. It presumes a shared agenda and a global partnership to do it.
The prime minister's address to British ambassadors in London
Tuesday January 7, 2003


“It is well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning .” - Henry Ford


"The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semioccult power which....pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I."

British military historian MajorGeneral J.F.C. Fuller, l941


"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976,
(killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets)

If this new world order you think exists and is so secret and all, why the hell do all these politicians keep mentioning it?

Common sense states that they are not referring to a one world government.

Originally posted by sensfan
If this new world order you think exists and is so secret and all, why the hell do all these politicians keep mentioning it?

Common sense states that they are not referring to a one world government.

ITS OFFICIAL....THE N.W.O is REAL


I think exists??
these are not my claims ...these are the claims
of the OFFICIALS....remember them?

I`m just doing a report.
I don`t really have to say anything cause the OFFICIALS say it all.
its their words... their OFFICIAL words.

secret?

its not a secret .... not even close.

the OFFICIALS talk about it all the time...... OFFICIALLY.
and then their OFFICIAL statements get reported on and recorded OFFICIALLY.

no secret there.

common sense ? ?
I just don`t know how to answer that one

its an OXYMORON (Common Sense Government)


ITS OFFICIAL....THE N.W.O is REAL

Thank you Maya432, you've provided evidence of the existence of a NWO.

Would you like to try and prove who exactly the NWO is, next?

Originally posted by sensfan
If this new world order you think exists and is so secret and all, why the hell do all these politicians keep mentioning it?

Common sense states that they are not referring to a one world government.

I tend to 'want' to side with you on these questions but the problem I have is this. Who OWNS the media? The big money on this planet owns the media. It used to be that the major media outlets were spread across 50 plus different entities. That was pretty shocking to most experts.

What is it at now? Roughly 6. That's it. We have 6 entities that are closely linked that run virtually ALL of the news the people receive. Who writes the history books that are taught in school? The people that report the history that's who. Who subsidizes the schools? The government. If the schools don't teach what they say to teach then they lose that money.

So, when so many well standing people come forth and make claims like this it is big news. Yet who is reporting it now? No one. It's because they CAN'T report it. Will you ever find these statements being taught in school? No. Because the people with the power (money) won't allow it. They teach our kids to obey authority without question. That government is wholely good. To trust government. Why? Because the government tells the schools to do that.

You see, if it wasn't so flippin obvious I would have to agree with you. It's just that I can't anymore. The statements speak for themselves.

Then there's the exiting speeches given by Hoover and Eisenhower (to name only two) that point at two major bodies in control. The MIC and the Federal Reserve. In other words, the MONEY.

OMG - back in the 90's, the NWO was a part of the WWE & WCW. are you telling me that professional wrestling is involved in this too

reply to post by Maya432


I completely agree,

I think these guys responsible need to be jailed forgood

If you look good, the world is allready in shape for the nwo, europe olmost unified,

The perfect situation for canada and the US to merge.
and china having 1/6 of the world population in one single place!..

Or not so perfect afterall heh? Atleast not for us ATS'ers..

So what's it going to be? They drive the oil prices skyhigh and the dollar will fall..?

Is it going to get really bad and wallstreet becomes no-mans land and is locked down?

that's going to mean canada and the US working together.

and then... the rest of 'em

(forgive the spelling)

OK... someone enlighten me here.

Lets just assume that the global elite goal is a N.W.O. what is so scary and evil about it? Where is it ever said that a N.W.O. means less rights for me and you? Where has it ever been said by any polititian that the goal on a N.W.O. means a one world government that the rest of humanity will serve?

I dont get it...

Stepping back to take a good hard look at the big picture I find that a New World Order may be just what this planet needs to not only survive, but to advance beyond the current trend of racism, war, famine, hatred, and general "wall building" going on between all of us.

United we stand, divided we fall.... remember?

Enough with the N.W.O. paranoia... evolve already...

the purpose of this thread was to prove the existence of the N.W.O

as far as who they are or what their agenda is...well I guess thats
a whole new bag of questions.

edit for spelling..

[edit on 16-5-2008 by Maya432]

reply to post by Creedo


Actually history proves that every utopia failed. Why this will be any different? But since there is very big difference - from this one there will be nowhere to escape - i do not want.