It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
You accuse me of using "dated" information, and then you quote poeple who haven't been there since the 1970s.
No one ever was allowed to excavate or even close to what would be called an "excavation" of the Hall of Records.
Next we drilled 4 inch bore holes on the anomalies and inspected the hole with downhole TV. Nothing was found except small cracks. We paid special attention to the front paws, and under the paws. No chambers!
I do not believe there are any chambers under the Sphinx at this point in time.
Originally posted by Harte
You are posting as lot of old information here.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Lol, they didn't drill down as far as the Hall of Records. THat's a long ways down. You can't deny that the chambers have been proven to be there through sesmographs, radar, and sonar. That's as far as the research has gotten really, no one drilled down that far, or as far as the actual chamber.
Originally posted by Hollywood11Something else that is quite telling, is that once the real researchers got in, in 1991, all of a sudden everyone was kicked out and barred from Giza by Hawass.
You're going to have to do better than people from the 1970s claiming to have drilled into something they couldn't have drilled into without going very very deep, much more than 4 inches!
Originally posted by Hollywood11That's not an excavation of the Hall of Records, that's not an excavation. Excavation means they drilled into the actual chamber.
Originally posted by Harte
I do not believe there are any chambers under the Sphinx at this point in time
Originally posted by Hollywood11
The research done in the 1970s was hardly thorough. The research and drilling done in the 1990s was done in much more detail with better equipment and methods. At the end of the day, scientific research and drilling done in the 1990s beats any research that would have been done in the 1970s.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
It is true that around 1996 almost researchers doing legitimate research relevant to actual history were kicked out of Egypt.
The Tomb of Akhenaton's Seal Bearer (June 2007)
Three Sarcaphagi Found in Saqqara (June 2007)
Another New Discovery in Saqqara (June 2007)
Intact Tomb at Al Barsha! (May 2007)
New Discoveries at Luxor (May 2005)
New Discoveries at Abydos (May 2005)
New Discovery at Saqqara (May 2005)
Last Sarcophagus Opened at KV 63!!
NEW TOMB DISCOVERED IN THE VALLEY!!
Discovering Queen Tiye!
New Discoveries at the Valley of the Mummies!
NEW DISCOVERY FROM DYNASTY 1
New 26th Dynasty Mummy Discovered!
New Pyramid Discovered at Abu Rowash
Discovery at El-Mataryia
Originally posted by Hollywood11
It is also true that around 1999, Hawass halted all research done at the Giza plateau for at least 10 years. All scienists except him have been barred from conducting research at Giza, including Rudolp Gattenbrinbk and the teams who were studing the Sphinx and Hall of Records.
In order to discover more about the purpose of the shafts of the so-called Queen’s Chamber, further work had to be done. The German Institute in Cairo had the concession to the Great Pyramid, and I could see that they were not interested in completing the work on the shafts. It was impossible to assign the concession to Gantenbrink as he is an individual, and the antiquities law in Egypt only allows for concessions to be granted to institutions. So I decided that the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA) would do the work instead.
In September 2003, we sent another robot into the shafts to find out what was behind the door. We opened a hole 1 cm in diameter and we sent a camera through the hole and we found another 21 cm beyond the first one.
Originally posted by Harte
So? The info you based your earlier claims on comes from the 1970s. I told you there has been more recent work done concerning the sphinx.
Find evidence that it hasn't and post it or stop claiming it.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Really?
Who, then, did all this:
You really don't watch these things, do you?
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Bull.
I guess you really don't want to know, do you?
For example, from 2003:
In order to discover more about the purpose of the shafts of the so-called Queen’s Chamber, further work had to be done. The German Institute in Cairo had the concession to the Great Pyramid, and I could see that they were not interested in completing the work on the shafts. It was impossible to assign the concession to Gantenbrink as he is an individual, and the antiquities law in Egypt only allows for concessions to be granted to institutions. So I decided that the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA) would do the work instead.
In September 2003, we sent another robot into the shafts to find out what was behind the door. We opened a hole 1 cm in diameter and we sent a camera through the hole and we found another 21 cm beyond the first one.
Source
Harte
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Oh yeah, even though the door is called the "Gatenbrink" door, and he is the rightful finder and claimer of it, Rudolph Gatenbrink is kicked out of Egypt to this day by Hawass the fraud who stole Gatenbrinks find and has covered up what it really is.
[edit on 14-5-2008 by Hollywood11]
Originally posted by Harte
The page I linked explains quite clearly that Gatenbrink has certainly not been "kicked out."
He lost his affiliation with the German Institute in Egypt. It was they that had the permit, not Gatenbrink.
1. The 'Door' In The Great Pyramid
In March 1993, a small 'door' made of marble or limestone with two copper handles fixed on it was discovered by a mechanized robot (Upuaut II, "The opener of the way" in ancient Egyptian) at the end of a long narrow shaft (8 x 8 inches and 200 feet long). Since then the discoverer, robotics engineer Rudolf Gantenbrink from Munich, has been banned from resuming the exploration and opening the door.
The official reason given by the Egyptian Antiquities Authorities (known as the Supreme Council of Antiquities - SCA - ) was that Gantenbrink leaded the news of the discovery to the British Press in April 1993 and thus, apparently, broke a 'rule' of archaeology. The director of the German Archaeological Institute in Cairo, Dr. Rainer Stadelmann, sided with the Egyptians and condemned Gantenbrink for his press action. Dr. Stadelmann was adamant about the non-importance of the find. "This is not a door; there is nothing behind it." The President of the Supreme Council for Antiquities, Dr. Muhamad Bakr, went as far as claiming a 'hoax'. "The orifice of the shaft is too small for the robot to go through" and accused the "German scientist" of not having the correct 'approvals' from the SCA to carry out the exploration.
Dr. Bakr fired the Chief Inspector of the Giza Pyramid Plateau, Dr. Zahi Hawass, although the official reason given was that a valuable ancient 'statue' under the custody of Hawass was stolen from Giza. Three months later, in June 1993, Dr. Bakr himself was fired and replaced by Dr. Nur El Din. Amid accusations of malpractice and fraud, Dr. Bakr spoke of a "Mafia" which had been involved with the Pyramids for the "last twenty years". Refusing to give names, Dr. Bakr said, "I wanted the whole matter investigated by the prosecution authorities, but my request was refused."
No individual can legally be granted a permit to conduct archaeology anywhere in Egypt. Only Institutions and accredited Archaeological groups. Hawass does not write the laws governing activity in Egypt.
And the second exploration of the 8 by 8 inch "doors" was not framed as if it were the first. If you look, you'll also find a Nat. Geographic article on it and you will find that a Japanese firm was involved.
Hawass "stole" nothing. This fact was established only a few weeks ago in another thread right here. The thread about Hawass and "unkept promises" I believe.
In March 1993, a small 'door' made of marble or limestone with two copper handles fixed on it was discovered by a mechanized robot (Upuaut II, "The opener of the way" in ancient Egyptian) at the end of a long narrow shaft (8 x 8 inches and 200 feet long). Since then the discoverer, robotics engineer Rudolf Gantenbrink from Munich, has been banned from resuming the exploration and opening the door.
Originally posted by Harte
The page I linked explains quite clearly that Gatenbrink has certainly not been "kicked out."
He lost his affiliation with the German Institute in Egypt. It was they that had the permit, not Gatenbrink.