It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Griff
If I ask nicely? OK. The man has said very little since 9/11. Why do you think "if I ask nicely" he would say something to me?
Originally posted by Griff
First, how could the PA say that Robertson's calcs said anything in 1964 when Robertson didn't do calcs until the 70's? There's a flaw here.
Second, The PA saying that the towers could withstand an airplane impact of over 600 mph (which is more than what happened on 9/11) has nothing to do with what happened? Those brave souls entered that building on the word from the PA that it would be safe and wouldn't globally collapse. That is liability.
No. It had far greater impact than just that. If it was a lie, then they are directly responsible for the deaths of the men and women who believed that lie.
So, which is it?
Originally posted by Griff
And only a closed mind doesn't see anything wrong with the very people we suspect holding onto ALL the evidence.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
I'd guess not, cuz when they all answer no, CTer world view will be shattered and this must be avoided.
5- I'd like to see a link where NIST says that drywall is responsible. Otherwise you need to retract that statement.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
You are NOT a real truther.
Originally posted by Griff
It's crap like this that makes me want to ignore you. Are you REALLY here for discussion? Or are you here to stroke your ego by calling us twoofers and such?
Now, if you come back and still say there is no evidence for thermate, I will have start calling you a liar as you've been calling us.
Originally posted by Griff
And now you finally go on ignore. You are not worth my time anymore.