NY Times, Washington Post Confirms That McCain Did Not Vote For Bush

NY Times, Washington Post Confirms That McCain Did Not Vote For Bush

www.huffingtonpost.com

On Monday, Arianna Huffington reported that John McCain told her he had not voted for George W. Bush in 2000. Today, both The New York Times AND The Washington Post published articles with sources confirming John McCain had indeed told Arianna and other members of the group she was with, that he did not vote for the President in 2000.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Can you really blame him given the dirty campaign Karl Rove and bush minor ran against him... especially in South Carolina when a "a group not affilated with the bush campaign" (yeah right) sent out a mailer claiming that McCain's adpoted Bangleshi daughter was actually a love child between McCain and a black prostitute.... talk about playing the race card.... and then the bush camp refused to repudiate it.

There has been bad blood between bush minor and McCain ever since which McCain has plastered over in his bid to get the eventual nomination.

www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Hey this is good for McDaddyCain, especially considering what's going on with the Libs on the left and Hillary not having a plan for withdrawal.

So much for the "a vote for McCain is a vote fore Bush" belief.

reply to post by Alxandro


Yeah, you're right. A vote for McCain isn't a vote for Bush. It's a vote for Henry Kissinger.. And you know who Henry Kissinger works for

Kissinger Advising Bush

McCain appears at Mass. campaign stop with Kissinger

I'm sure that they're using that news article to get anti-Bush republicans to vote for McCain.

reply to post by TheBandit795


Maybe someone can help me out with a name here, but hasn't one of Kissinger's cronies taken Obama under his wing?

I may have read about it here, but I can't remember the person's name.

If Kissinger is involved, I guess that means McCain will be our next Prez.

[edit on 9-5-2008 by Alxandro]

I have to snicker when I see two politicians who've had a poop slinging contest get up on stage and hug each other like long seperated twins.
Slimey, greasy, and pretentious. Just once I'd like someone to take a glove off and wap the other in the face with it for an old fashioned duel.

Actually, it only confirms that he said he didn't vote for Bush.

He probably wouldn't have though - he had a seething pot of hate for Bush in 2000.

This story only serves to help him with independents. I wonder what the party affiliation is of the person who first came forward?

reply to post by Alxandro


Zbigniew Brzezinski. Both he and Kissinger work for David Rockefeller.

We have a secret ballot in the US and no one is obligated to reveal that information, not even at a Hollywood dinner party.

It is of no importance whatsoever whom McCain voted for.

One thing we know for sure is that McCain is no party hardliner.

We are reasonably sure that McCain exercised his Constitutional right on election day and that is all that really counts.

I shared this with my neighbor who smartly replied, "Maybe he is not as stupid as I thought he was."

I almost peed myself.

I read the Huffingtonpost and like Arianna, but she has her reasons for saying this about McCain, not the least of them publicity for herself. She's doing McCain a favor by claiming he didn't vote for Bush, but she's hardly an unbiased source.

Haha, I was just reading on the Huffington Post where some lawyer who was at a barbeque with McCain in 1999 asked him what he thought of Bush:

"He's Dumber than a Stump."

Hey now that's slandering stumps... Come on now give a dead piece of wood some credit now will ya.

You stole my thunder grover. I was going to say that gives stumps everywhere a bad name.

Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by Alxandro

 

Zbigniew Brzezinski. Both he and Kissinger work for David Rockefeller.

So it can also be safe to say that a vote for Obama is a vote for Bush?